Una donna divorziata e sua figlia diabetica si rifugiano nella stanza sicura della loro casa appena acquistata quando tre uomini irrompono nella casa alla ricerca di una fortuna scomparsa.Una donna divorziata e sua figlia diabetica si rifugiano nella stanza sicura della loro casa appena acquistata quando tre uomini irrompono nella casa alla ricerca di una fortuna scomparsa.Una donna divorziata e sua figlia diabetica si rifugiano nella stanza sicura della loro casa appena acquistata quando tre uomini irrompono nella casa alla ricerca di una fortuna scomparsa.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 9 candidature totali
Ty Copeman
- Truck Driver
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Nicole Kidman
- Stephen's Girlfriend on the Phone
- (voce)
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
This movie is a nice piece of work! Those expecting or needing an edgy film ala Seven or Fight Club, don't bother. This movie does not pretend or intend to be what it is not. The camera work is great, the photography is great, and the acting is note-perfect given the script.
Nothing over-ambitious and the Fincher flick with the most appropriate running time and the least false notes so far. This is a classic thriller, much better than the negative reviews from other people led me to believe.
The photography is perfect for the movie. That includes the virtual camera work. Yes it looks like a David Fincher movie, but no it is not intentionally depressing and ugly as his others. The lighting works with the settings (3am in a huge house.)
Yes it's violent, that's why it's R rated. No, it's not something you'll necessarily want to watch a second time. This 90 very entertaining minutes of "now what's gonna happen"?
So suspend your disbelief a tad, sit back, and be entertained.
Nothing over-ambitious and the Fincher flick with the most appropriate running time and the least false notes so far. This is a classic thriller, much better than the negative reviews from other people led me to believe.
The photography is perfect for the movie. That includes the virtual camera work. Yes it looks like a David Fincher movie, but no it is not intentionally depressing and ugly as his others. The lighting works with the settings (3am in a huge house.)
Yes it's violent, that's why it's R rated. No, it's not something you'll necessarily want to watch a second time. This 90 very entertaining minutes of "now what's gonna happen"?
So suspend your disbelief a tad, sit back, and be entertained.
This movie kept me at the edge of my seat from 10 minutes inside of it and all through until its very end. A very good story highlighted by very good performances.
My hat off to Jodie Foster and Kristen Stewart, they're great playing mother and daughter.
Country-singer-turned-actor Dwight Yoakam outdoes himself portraying one of the burglars.
My hat off to Jodie Foster and Kristen Stewart, they're great playing mother and daughter.
Country-singer-turned-actor Dwight Yoakam outdoes himself portraying one of the burglars.
Panic Room (2002)
There are three reasons to see Panic Room. 1) The titles: understated, gorgeous, uncanny letters floating in the Manhattan cityscape. 2) The photography: camera moving like an animal, slipping between tiny spaces, swinging across rooms and through floors, inhabiting the screen like another character. 3) Forest Whitaker, again (he's so good so often it's hard to not expect a great performance).
The rest of the film is very good, directed with style and intelligence as usual by David Fincher (who did Seven and Fight Club). The plot is good, but maybe a little conventional overall, and if the details aren't completely predictable, the general flow of events is. The whole cast is quite good--Foster in a familiar embattled, determined role, and Jared Leto is an appropriately crazed, if slightly caricatured, bad guy who just wants money. Don't we all.
I saw this when it came out and was dazzled and yet disappointed by the plot. The second time, knowing the events, I was able to just watch how they unfolded, and it was much better. Expect suspense, intensity, and beautiful camera-work.
There are three reasons to see Panic Room. 1) The titles: understated, gorgeous, uncanny letters floating in the Manhattan cityscape. 2) The photography: camera moving like an animal, slipping between tiny spaces, swinging across rooms and through floors, inhabiting the screen like another character. 3) Forest Whitaker, again (he's so good so often it's hard to not expect a great performance).
The rest of the film is very good, directed with style and intelligence as usual by David Fincher (who did Seven and Fight Club). The plot is good, but maybe a little conventional overall, and if the details aren't completely predictable, the general flow of events is. The whole cast is quite good--Foster in a familiar embattled, determined role, and Jared Leto is an appropriately crazed, if slightly caricatured, bad guy who just wants money. Don't we all.
I saw this when it came out and was dazzled and yet disappointed by the plot. The second time, knowing the events, I was able to just watch how they unfolded, and it was much better. Expect suspense, intensity, and beautiful camera-work.
David Fincher directs this cleverly conceived thriller about a mother and daughter trapped inside a panic room by three criminals. The film is well-paced and the camera work is slick. The film does well in exploring the confines of the house. Jodie Foster is effective and maintains a high intensity throughout. Kristen Stewart is decent as her daughter. Forest Whitaker plays a slightly sympathetic criminal and does well. Unfortunately, after an engrossing game of cat and mouse, the conclusion is weak. Staple clichés crop up and the film goes for a crowd-pleasing finale that doesn't quite feel right. Still watchable.
Overall 7/10
Overall 7/10
This movie starts out slow, but it builds tension. This would be a very terrifying situation. I can see why Dwight Yoakam wears a stetson all the time. Is acting going to be his new career? He plays a real good creep. This movie has a sense of realism. It is worth seeing on the big screen.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to David Fincher, Kristen Stewart grew more than three inches during filming of this project. She was smaller than Jodie Foster when the production started and towered over her when the final shots were done.
- BlooperWhen Meg starts searching for a "chocolate bar" once Sarah's sugar level drops, Sarah says she had already searched in the box and had found nothing. Yet we clearly see standard U.S. Military M.R.E. (meal ready to eat) packages which include a high sugar ration (in the form of, or in addition to, a dessert with the meal itself and sugar to be used with the included instant coffee), when Sarah was first searching.
- Curiosità sui creditiOpening credits are amazingly realistic in that they cast shadows and are reflected on the surrounding glass buildings.
- Versioni alternativeThe film's VHS & HDTV release presented the film open-matte, at an aspect ratio of 1.78:1, meaning there is more picture at the top and bottom of the frame than on DVD, which presents the original theatrical aspect ratio (2.39:1).
- ConnessioniEdited into HBO First Look: The Making of 'Panic Room' (2002)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- La habitación del pánico
- Luoghi delle riprese
- 38 West 94th Street, Manhattan, New York, New York, Stati Uniti(townhouse exteriors)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 48.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 96.397.334 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 30.056.751 USD
- 31 mar 2002
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 197.079.546 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 52 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti