VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
1519
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaOn Halloween, a group of medical students steal the corpse a serial killer from a morgue and raise him from the dead, inadvertently putting themselves and a group of young neighborhood child... Leggi tuttoOn Halloween, a group of medical students steal the corpse a serial killer from a morgue and raise him from the dead, inadvertently putting themselves and a group of young neighborhood children in danger.On Halloween, a group of medical students steal the corpse a serial killer from a morgue and raise him from the dead, inadvertently putting themselves and a group of young neighborhood children in danger.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 2 candidature totali
Hugo Stiglitz
- Dr. Cardán
- (as Hugo Stieglitz)
Servando Manzetti
- Jorge
- (as Cervando Manzetti)
Recensioni in evidenza
I just saw it yesterday in cable TV. Anyway... I love these little horror Mexican gems directed from Ruben Galindo. Sadly it was a cut version, but i didn't ruin the mood anyway. Two major plot holes.. or goofs..
1. The doctor (Hugo Stiglitz) said that the killer only can die burn to ashes.. but later said he needs the black book for destroy him.
2. It is suppose to be Halloween night, but when the boys are reading the book, they said something about.. "This is the sixth day of the sixth month?... ¿Uh?...
Anyway.. everybody watch these movies for the jumps, not for the logical sense of it...
Sorry for my bad English...
1. The doctor (Hugo Stiglitz) said that the killer only can die burn to ashes.. but later said he needs the black book for destroy him.
2. It is suppose to be Halloween night, but when the boys are reading the book, they said something about.. "This is the sixth day of the sixth month?... ¿Uh?...
Anyway.. everybody watch these movies for the jumps, not for the logical sense of it...
Sorry for my bad English...
Some movies require more of our suspension of disbelief than others, and this is surely one of them. Lines of dialogue that don't quite comport with the scenario; small inclusions that either abruptly introduce an entirely new narrative element, or are maybe just so poorly considered that we have to either presume the same or go mad; characters written with so little intelligence or so much obliviousness as to be contrivances of pure Movie Magic; and so on. In fairness, despite any flourishes to present, at its core this is still a slasher - just one mixed with some supernatural aspects - and in no way is it a film that was intended to be approached with any but the most superficial and unbothered of eyes. It's a big ask to wholly dispense with any critical thought to watch a picture. I suppose if one is able to do so, however, this is passably enjoyable? Look, 'Cemetery of terror' just definitely is no height of horror storytelling or film-making, that's for sure. But it's entertaining enough.
The blood and gore look good. I like the production design and art direction. It's well made from a technical standpoint, and while the story in its broad strokes is nothing special, it's still suitable grisly fun. It's in the details that the feature falls apart. I've seen too many poorly made movies to count, and while I wouldn't say that this is one of them, no comparison readily comes to mind to have so enthusiastically encouraged willful myopia of the viewer such that we can't pick apart every minutiae therein. 'Cemetery of terror' demands that we turn off our brain to engage with it, or else we're confronted with an endless stream of flummoxed, skeptical reactions of "What?! ... okay, sure."
It's a pity that the writing weren't more cohesive, coherent, and complete, because if it were by even just a small measure, the feature would have greatly benefited. There are some swell ideas in here, and between the orchestration generally of some scenes, and the addition of Chucho Zarzosa's excellent score to cement the tension and atmosphere, some moments are especially well done. At its best - or at least in its best potential - this is pretty much just as solid as any like horror flick might be. At its worst, one can only respond with "you're kidding me, right?"
Against all odds I think the last third of the picture is sufficiently well done as to pick up the considerable slack that it had dropped earlier. I think the cast generally perform well with what they're given. More so than not this is pretty okay! I just really wish the narrative and scene writing had been tightened, for that would have made a huge difference. Don't go out of your way to watch this, and by no means is it a must-see, but if you have the chance to check out 'Cemetery of terror' and can abide the most severe inelegance it may boast, this is a moderately worthwhile way to spend ninety minutes.
The blood and gore look good. I like the production design and art direction. It's well made from a technical standpoint, and while the story in its broad strokes is nothing special, it's still suitable grisly fun. It's in the details that the feature falls apart. I've seen too many poorly made movies to count, and while I wouldn't say that this is one of them, no comparison readily comes to mind to have so enthusiastically encouraged willful myopia of the viewer such that we can't pick apart every minutiae therein. 'Cemetery of terror' demands that we turn off our brain to engage with it, or else we're confronted with an endless stream of flummoxed, skeptical reactions of "What?! ... okay, sure."
It's a pity that the writing weren't more cohesive, coherent, and complete, because if it were by even just a small measure, the feature would have greatly benefited. There are some swell ideas in here, and between the orchestration generally of some scenes, and the addition of Chucho Zarzosa's excellent score to cement the tension and atmosphere, some moments are especially well done. At its best - or at least in its best potential - this is pretty much just as solid as any like horror flick might be. At its worst, one can only respond with "you're kidding me, right?"
Against all odds I think the last third of the picture is sufficiently well done as to pick up the considerable slack that it had dropped earlier. I think the cast generally perform well with what they're given. More so than not this is pretty okay! I just really wish the narrative and scene writing had been tightened, for that would have made a huge difference. Don't go out of your way to watch this, and by no means is it a must-see, but if you have the chance to check out 'Cemetery of terror' and can abide the most severe inelegance it may boast, this is a moderately worthwhile way to spend ninety minutes.
The premise is tried and true. A group of young people break into an old and spooky abandoned house looking for nothing less than a good time. Just a night of booze, babes, boom box, and, of course, black magic. They, naturally, end up waking a dormant evil force which proceeds to terrorize and kill anyone drinking, fornicating, or trespassing in its lair.
Sound familiar yet? It should. It's been the plot to countless other horror films including Night of the Demons, The Evil Dead, and Hell Night. Now add Cemetery of Terror to the list.
I think this movie ranks up their with its contemporaries, though. It utilizes all the best techniques of a certified 80s horror gem. It's got plenty of blood and carnage, good plot, great atmosphere, and takes place on that wonderful horror movie time of the year: Halloween. The evil antagonist in this film is a superbly terrifying super-human Satanic slasher named Devlon who could easily give Michael Myers a run for his money. I don't recall Mikey selling his should to Satan, after all. And, as if Devlon wasn't enough for you, throw in a Necronomicon-type book which summons an army of zombies into the mix. Because what good is a spooky old cemetery in a horror film if you're not going to use it?
Made for Mexican audiences and filmed in Texas,this movie is definitely worth looking into if you are a fan of all-out 80s slasher gore fun. It effortlessly compares with a lot of great American horror trash cinema classics. So bring on the booze, babes, boom box, and black magic and let's party!
Sound familiar yet? It should. It's been the plot to countless other horror films including Night of the Demons, The Evil Dead, and Hell Night. Now add Cemetery of Terror to the list.
I think this movie ranks up their with its contemporaries, though. It utilizes all the best techniques of a certified 80s horror gem. It's got plenty of blood and carnage, good plot, great atmosphere, and takes place on that wonderful horror movie time of the year: Halloween. The evil antagonist in this film is a superbly terrifying super-human Satanic slasher named Devlon who could easily give Michael Myers a run for his money. I don't recall Mikey selling his should to Satan, after all. And, as if Devlon wasn't enough for you, throw in a Necronomicon-type book which summons an army of zombies into the mix. Because what good is a spooky old cemetery in a horror film if you're not going to use it?
Made for Mexican audiences and filmed in Texas,this movie is definitely worth looking into if you are a fan of all-out 80s slasher gore fun. It effortlessly compares with a lot of great American horror trash cinema classics. So bring on the booze, babes, boom box, and black magic and let's party!
This fairly unknown Mexican zombie movie may not be the most original horror film ever to be released, and clearly takes a lot of influence from many successful American movies in the same vein; but in it's own right, this is an extremely fun little romp that I'm sure wont be a disappointment to most people with an inclination to track it down. The plot is halfway between a zombie movie and a psycho slasher flick and focuses on a killer who a professor believes may have come back from the grave. Enter a bunch of kids who decide that it would be a good idea to read from a strange old book and resurrect the dead (to impress some girls, naturally). It's not long before the killer has come back as a zombie - bringing the rest of the cemetery with him and the dead have eating the kids' flesh on their minds. If you've seen more than a handful of zombie flicks, you'll have seen everything included in this film many times before. But that's not to say that Cemetery of Terror is not worth a look. Director Rubén Galindo Jr does an excellent job of creating a thoroughly fetid atmosphere to surround the cemetery at the centre of the film and there's a fair bit of gore included too, most of which is well done. Naturally the acting is nothing to write home about, but everyone approaches their roles with gusto and the film remains entertaining for the duration. Overall, this is not brilliant; but it's a more than worthy Mexican horror entry and I would say that it's worth seeing.
CEMETERY OF TERROR is a Mexican slasher/zombie/supernatural horror film which seems to take its inspiration from sources as varied as
NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968), HALLOWEEN (1978), CITY OF THE LIVING DEAD (1980), EVIL DEAD (1981), ABSURD (1981) and even Michael Jackson's THRILLER (1983). Unfortunately, it is not nearly as good as any of them.
The story concerns a recently deceased psychiatric inmate named Devlon who kinda looks like George Eastman, and whose psychiatrist rushes to try to have cremated because he believes him to be a demon.
Unbeknownst to the good doctor, a group of mischievous teenagers steal the corpse from the morgue and transport him to a local cemetery, where they invoke spells from a black book of magic they just happened to find at a nearby abandoned house, all to scare their girlfriends into submission, apparently. Meanwhile, a group of children decide to visit the cemetery at night as a sort of test of courage.
Predictably, the teenagers manage to reanimate the corpse, and then all hell breaks loose.
If the setup sounds incredibly contrived and stupid then that is because it is. One improbable coincidence follows another, seasoned with unrealistic behavior by almost all of the main characters. Also, the setup takes way too long: we are nearly 40 minutes into the movie before Devlon George finally rises.
Although some of the special effects are decent for the 1980s, many of the actual death scenes range from unconvincing to ludicrous. In one scene, a victim is repeatedly clawed in the face by Devlon George, who stands right in front of him and yet seems to escape notice.
Even though the movie is not good, it still has some of that nostalgic 80s charm which prevents me from giving it a lower rating, but let's face it: unless you know what I am talking about, this film is probably not for you.
The story concerns a recently deceased psychiatric inmate named Devlon who kinda looks like George Eastman, and whose psychiatrist rushes to try to have cremated because he believes him to be a demon.
Unbeknownst to the good doctor, a group of mischievous teenagers steal the corpse from the morgue and transport him to a local cemetery, where they invoke spells from a black book of magic they just happened to find at a nearby abandoned house, all to scare their girlfriends into submission, apparently. Meanwhile, a group of children decide to visit the cemetery at night as a sort of test of courage.
Predictably, the teenagers manage to reanimate the corpse, and then all hell breaks loose.
If the setup sounds incredibly contrived and stupid then that is because it is. One improbable coincidence follows another, seasoned with unrealistic behavior by almost all of the main characters. Also, the setup takes way too long: we are nearly 40 minutes into the movie before Devlon George finally rises.
Although some of the special effects are decent for the 1980s, many of the actual death scenes range from unconvincing to ludicrous. In one scene, a victim is repeatedly clawed in the face by Devlon George, who stands right in front of him and yet seems to escape notice.
Even though the movie is not good, it still has some of that nostalgic 80s charm which prevents me from giving it a lower rating, but let's face it: unless you know what I am talking about, this film is probably not for you.
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniFeatured in Enemigos a muerte (1985)
- Colonne sonoreThe Line
Performed by Bent Myggen
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Cemetery of Terror?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Cementerio del terror (1985) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi