Thor viene allevato da Etna l'uomo uccello, dopo che Sheeba e Knut, suoi genitori, sono stati uccisi dal perfido Gnut. Thor, grazie agli insegnamenti di Etna, è ben presto pronto per la sua ... Leggi tuttoThor viene allevato da Etna l'uomo uccello, dopo che Sheeba e Knut, suoi genitori, sono stati uccisi dal perfido Gnut. Thor, grazie agli insegnamenti di Etna, è ben presto pronto per la sua missione: sconfiggere il perfido Gnut.Thor viene allevato da Etna l'uomo uccello, dopo che Sheeba e Knut, suoi genitori, sono stati uccisi dal perfido Gnut. Thor, grazie agli insegnamenti di Etna, è ben presto pronto per la sua missione: sconfiggere il perfido Gnut.
Bruno Minniti
- Thor
- (as Conrad Nichols)
Malisa Longo
- Ino, Third Virgin Warrior
- (as Malisa Lang)
Raf Baldassarre
- Gnut
- (as Raf Falcone)
Luigi Mezzanotte
- Etna, the Owl
- (as Christopher Holm)
Artemio Antonini
- Barbarian Chief
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Giovanni Cianfriglia
- Cannibal Chief
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Osiride Pevarello
- Barbarian
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Rinaldo Zamperla
- Gnut's Tribesman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
I like how Thor is a retarded rapist whose only friend is a misogynistic mystic who turns into an owl, doesn't offer help when it's needed, and likes to watch. Wait, I don't like that at all!
Seriously, I pride myself on having seen almost every sword and sorcery movie made in the 80's. Even knowing in advance how bad this movie was supposed to be, it went down pretty hard. Fortunately, I had good company - we've climbed a lot of z-movie Everests before. Even Deathstalker IV was better. To go outside of sword and sorcery, even Star Knight or Nukie compare favorably to Thor.
The only 80's sword and sorcery movies that may be worse are: Princess Warrior, Time Barbarians, and Wizards Of The Demon Sword (1991). I haven't seen these to confirm for myself, but as one of them is supposedly shot on video (and is REALLY bad to begin with), another is a Fred Olen Ray film, and two of them are of the "Barbarian in L.A." type, I'm betting any time spent as an audience with these would be pretty gruesome.
The other IMDb reviewers have this film exactly right. It's miserable. Absolutely unmotivated, and engaging only where it offends or is too seizure-inducingly stupid. (incidentally, the first line I wrote accurately summarizes EVERYTHING in Thor).
There ARE some funny moments. My favorite is when Thor's mystic/mentor produces an - uh, is it all right if I call it an equine? - and explains to him that "this is a creature that will not be called a horse for several centuries," or something to that effect. This, of course, means that if you WANTED to call it a horse in the meantime during the intervening centuries, you'd be stuck.
It doesn't stop being moronic there, though; Thor proceeds to use the horse to, uh........impress his enemies? All he does is ride it up and down a field while his enemies watch; doesn't so much as brandish his sword. Eventually, they flee. I'm sure in the script it said "Thor's enemies, having never seen a horse before, flee in terror." Yeah. That's not really conveyed. But then, not much is in "Thor." My friend and I marveled at its shortcomings.
Recommended for barbarian completists and bad movie fetishists only.
Seriously, I pride myself on having seen almost every sword and sorcery movie made in the 80's. Even knowing in advance how bad this movie was supposed to be, it went down pretty hard. Fortunately, I had good company - we've climbed a lot of z-movie Everests before. Even Deathstalker IV was better. To go outside of sword and sorcery, even Star Knight or Nukie compare favorably to Thor.
The only 80's sword and sorcery movies that may be worse are: Princess Warrior, Time Barbarians, and Wizards Of The Demon Sword (1991). I haven't seen these to confirm for myself, but as one of them is supposedly shot on video (and is REALLY bad to begin with), another is a Fred Olen Ray film, and two of them are of the "Barbarian in L.A." type, I'm betting any time spent as an audience with these would be pretty gruesome.
The other IMDb reviewers have this film exactly right. It's miserable. Absolutely unmotivated, and engaging only where it offends or is too seizure-inducingly stupid. (incidentally, the first line I wrote accurately summarizes EVERYTHING in Thor).
There ARE some funny moments. My favorite is when Thor's mystic/mentor produces an - uh, is it all right if I call it an equine? - and explains to him that "this is a creature that will not be called a horse for several centuries," or something to that effect. This, of course, means that if you WANTED to call it a horse in the meantime during the intervening centuries, you'd be stuck.
It doesn't stop being moronic there, though; Thor proceeds to use the horse to, uh........impress his enemies? All he does is ride it up and down a field while his enemies watch; doesn't so much as brandish his sword. Eventually, they flee. I'm sure in the script it said "Thor's enemies, having never seen a horse before, flee in terror." Yeah. That's not really conveyed. But then, not much is in "Thor." My friend and I marveled at its shortcomings.
Recommended for barbarian completists and bad movie fetishists only.
Okay I often watch barbarian films and try and empathise with the lead character. Primal, base and violent. However after watching this movie I found I couldn't even relate to the lead character.
Firstly the lead, Thor, is shot as a baby, yet survives. Okay he must be well hard, but why is this never referred to? Secondly he is accompanied by a camp "Birdman" who says he cannot follow Thor, yet is always there, especially when our "Hero" is about to have sex.
Oh yes, our "hero" he kills women, rapes them, steals, kills. And we are suppose to feel sorry for him when he is blinded?
Oh year and I thought maybe if the sword turned into the snake, the snake might transform into the sword, no that would be daft.
Another bad point is this film refused to end when we shouted "END!" at the TV.
THis film is tosh, but I will leave you with the line "In centuries to come it will be called horse", I mean... what is it called now?
2 out of Ten
Jake "The Jiggybeast" Roberts
Firstly the lead, Thor, is shot as a baby, yet survives. Okay he must be well hard, but why is this never referred to? Secondly he is accompanied by a camp "Birdman" who says he cannot follow Thor, yet is always there, especially when our "Hero" is about to have sex.
Oh yes, our "hero" he kills women, rapes them, steals, kills. And we are suppose to feel sorry for him when he is blinded?
Oh year and I thought maybe if the sword turned into the snake, the snake might transform into the sword, no that would be daft.
Another bad point is this film refused to end when we shouted "END!" at the TV.
THis film is tosh, but I will leave you with the line "In centuries to come it will be called horse", I mean... what is it called now?
2 out of Ten
Jake "The Jiggybeast" Roberts
well everybody already said how blatantly bad this movie is (the
attempts at humour seems to be directed at the viewer, just to say
"The joke's on you, sucker !", but I have to point out one scene
where we see the hero and one cronie walking to Well, walking.
Obviously you can see a whole modern village (Italian, I gather) in
the background with no attempt to hide it ! I wonder if it was
intentional or just sloppyness. Of course, you'd say, nowadays they do the same thing in the US,
with a 30 mil budget and a few MTV groovy young stars and none
of the wackiness typical to Italian B-movies, but Check a Sergio
Martino movie instead of this one. And I saw it in a theatre. After all, maybe I SHOULD get a life
attempts at humour seems to be directed at the viewer, just to say
"The joke's on you, sucker !", but I have to point out one scene
where we see the hero and one cronie walking to Well, walking.
Obviously you can see a whole modern village (Italian, I gather) in
the background with no attempt to hide it ! I wonder if it was
intentional or just sloppyness. Of course, you'd say, nowadays they do the same thing in the US,
with a 30 mil budget and a few MTV groovy young stars and none
of the wackiness typical to Italian B-movies, but Check a Sergio
Martino movie instead of this one. And I saw it in a theatre. After all, maybe I SHOULD get a life
Now I know that general opinion holds this film in utter disdain and yes, I will concede that it is certainly no cinematic masterpiece, but.......there is a certain strange fascination that it exudes in it's primitiveness.
This is REALLY low budget movie making in effect.
The story details the protagonist's adventures in a land filled with various perils such as demons and evil tribes etc. There is also an underlying story of revenge as Thor's fate leads him to battle and eventually slay the barbarian who murdered his father when he was a baby.
Whilst the plot itself is incredibly basic, (if it even merits as a plot at all) the way it unfolds on screen is bizarrely compelling.
I really can't put my finger on exactly why I rather enjoyed such a universally reviled movie. As said above perhaps the sheer baseness of the picture was the attraction to me. Certainly the closest movie I could liken it to was Lucio Fulci's similarly themed 'Conquest', again a film which is generally loathed by most people (even fans of the Sword & Sorcery genre to which it belongs) but again, a film which I found to be strangely intriguing.
Overall then, if your a fan of Sword & Sorcery flicks then you might want to give Thor The Conqueror a try - just don't expect anything along the quality lines of Conan The Barbarian.
This is REALLY low budget movie making in effect.
The story details the protagonist's adventures in a land filled with various perils such as demons and evil tribes etc. There is also an underlying story of revenge as Thor's fate leads him to battle and eventually slay the barbarian who murdered his father when he was a baby.
Whilst the plot itself is incredibly basic, (if it even merits as a plot at all) the way it unfolds on screen is bizarrely compelling.
I really can't put my finger on exactly why I rather enjoyed such a universally reviled movie. As said above perhaps the sheer baseness of the picture was the attraction to me. Certainly the closest movie I could liken it to was Lucio Fulci's similarly themed 'Conquest', again a film which is generally loathed by most people (even fans of the Sword & Sorcery genre to which it belongs) but again, a film which I found to be strangely intriguing.
Overall then, if your a fan of Sword & Sorcery flicks then you might want to give Thor The Conqueror a try - just don't expect anything along the quality lines of Conan The Barbarian.
If you think you saw every bad movie in the world - this turkey is worse.
It´s the "new" story of a guy named Thor whose parents got killed by a bad guy named Gunt in the beginning. With the aid of a strange magician (who transformes into a Owl from time to time) he grows up to be a great warrior. But first he has to find a magic sword (yawn), kill hordes of bad looking cannibals and learn to make love (just kisses are allowed here).
The whole pic was shot in a small forest, the only buildings (sort of) are three strawhuts which stand in for a village and a cave which hides the sword.
To name the performances "acting" would be unfair to any school-theatre-group, to call the work of the director "directing" would be against any good taste. But the worst of all are the "fight-scenes" and there many of them in this stinker.
Don´t rent it - ignore it, and if you see it through any bad coincidence - wash your eyes and try to forget this wasted time. It´s not even so bad its good - trust me
It´s the "new" story of a guy named Thor whose parents got killed by a bad guy named Gunt in the beginning. With the aid of a strange magician (who transformes into a Owl from time to time) he grows up to be a great warrior. But first he has to find a magic sword (yawn), kill hordes of bad looking cannibals and learn to make love (just kisses are allowed here).
The whole pic was shot in a small forest, the only buildings (sort of) are three strawhuts which stand in for a village and a cave which hides the sword.
To name the performances "acting" would be unfair to any school-theatre-group, to call the work of the director "directing" would be against any good taste. But the worst of all are the "fight-scenes" and there many of them in this stinker.
Don´t rent it - ignore it, and if you see it through any bad coincidence - wash your eyes and try to forget this wasted time. It´s not even so bad its good - trust me
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniReferenced in Best of the Worst: Our DVD and Blu-ray Collection (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Thor the Conqueror?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Thor the Conqueror
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the English language plot outline for Thor il conquistatore (1983)?
Rispondi