VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,9/10
25.730
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
La senatrice Laine Hanson è una contendente per il vicepresidente degli Stati Uniti, ma informazioni e disinformazione sul suo passato emergono che minacciano di far deragliare la sua carrie... Leggi tuttoLa senatrice Laine Hanson è una contendente per il vicepresidente degli Stati Uniti, ma informazioni e disinformazione sul suo passato emergono che minacciano di far deragliare la sua carriera politica.La senatrice Laine Hanson è una contendente per il vicepresidente degli Stati Uniti, ma informazioni e disinformazione sul suo passato emergono che minacciano di far deragliare la sua carriera politica.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Candidato a 2 Oscar
- 1 vittoria e 22 candidature totali
Angelica Page
- Dierdra
- (as Angelica Torn)
Joseph Lyle Taylor
- Paul Smith
- (as Joe Taylor)
Recensioni in evidenza
This is a really good film, much better than the 6.9 it has here. However, if you watch it on Amazon Video, DO NOT watch the trailer.
Incredibly the idiots who set this up make the actual key scene, the whole twist upon which the movie stands, the trailer.
The WHOLE SCENE.
Absolute idiots.
The WHOLE SCENE.
Absolute idiots.
The Contender is a film with the potential to take any conscientious person with even a mild interest in how governments are run , and who the leaders are through a non-stop roller-coaster ride of challenge, triumph, pain, failure, and morality. Although I intensely appreciated this movie, I do not believe this could have been an oscar-winning film because the truths it expresses with regards to the presence of women in high ranking political positions far outway its acting and directing talents, with the possible exception of Gary Oldman's role as Shelly Runyon, who was frighteningly convincing at being an absolutely awful man. I enjoyed this movie because of its intention to show what women in politics really face. The strength displayed by Laine Hanson (Joan Allen) while up for vice president is nothing short of inspirational. Gary Oldman's character provides us with a good idea of how manipulative and ruthless people can be when in a position of power and, ironically, when they have been put in a position to judge another's morality. This film seems so realistic that we tend to forget it's a movie. It makes us question, why does a person have to be surrounded by such controversy and be forced to take on such a defensive position, simply for being a woman? What I appreciated is the refusal of Hanson to succomb to the pressure of taking that defensive position, regardless of the truth. Of course, the other refreshing aspect in this movie is Jeff Bridges' role as an ideal president.
All in all, it is a long overdue account of reality, with great character development but not recommended for those with short attention spans, as it is dialogue, and lots of it.
All in all, it is a long overdue account of reality, with great character development but not recommended for those with short attention spans, as it is dialogue, and lots of it.
Excellent political thriller-drama with a great cast which certainly delivered. The story isn't very original, but that doesn't bother. Jeff Bridges was very good and funny as the president of the United States. He was always very relaxed and human during his role. The attitude, the way of thinking, the nonchalance... it made his performance quite amazing. Jeff Bridges is one of my favourite actors. He capable of playing every role. Be honest, who would have thought "the dude" would make an excellent president as well?
Furthermore I loved Joan Allen's and Gary Oldman's performance as well. Both were excellent. As well as Christian Slater playing the young idealist. "The Contender" certainly deserves this rating and I'm convinced it even deserves a higher rating, something like 7.3.
"The Contender" is political thriller-drama which is certainly worth watching. Although this movie doesn't want to make a certain (moral) statement, I loved the following quote by Joan Allen's character: "Principles only mean something when you stick to them when its inconvenient."
9/10
Furthermore I loved Joan Allen's and Gary Oldman's performance as well. Both were excellent. As well as Christian Slater playing the young idealist. "The Contender" certainly deserves this rating and I'm convinced it even deserves a higher rating, something like 7.3.
"The Contender" is political thriller-drama which is certainly worth watching. Although this movie doesn't want to make a certain (moral) statement, I loved the following quote by Joan Allen's character: "Principles only mean something when you stick to them when its inconvenient."
9/10
This is one of the worst movies ever made. I don't know how a movie that is so unrealistic can have so many good actors sign up for it. The vice presidential confirmation hearing is unwatchable. The surprise ending ridiculous and implausible. The opening scene, where Joan Allen is having sex with her husband of 7 years just before she gets the call to be VP is as unbelievable as a male senator having sex with his wife just before he gets nominated. By the way, when was the last time there was an early 40ish person nominated for VP. Yet we are led to believe this VP nomination can still bear children.
This movie begins with the premise that the democrats are right and the republicans wrong. What a load of bunk. Joan Allen plays a H. Clintonesque character who's morality is being addressed. There is a morality play. But the movie moves slowly and is condescending. And in Hollywoods own mysterious ways they pick Christian slater to play a moralistic congressman. Luckily, the distinguished gentleman with Eddie Murphy was on afterwards and was able to clean my movie viewing palate.
This movie begins with the premise that the democrats are right and the republicans wrong. What a load of bunk. Joan Allen plays a H. Clintonesque character who's morality is being addressed. There is a morality play. But the movie moves slowly and is condescending. And in Hollywoods own mysterious ways they pick Christian slater to play a moralistic congressman. Luckily, the distinguished gentleman with Eddie Murphy was on afterwards and was able to clean my movie viewing palate.
Did you ever notice how the losers; the baddies and the incompetents always have thinning hair or are outright baldies in the movies?
Talk about typecasting: Jeff Bridges as the Prez. Full head of hair, high energy, masculine, physically fit and pretty funny, too. Pretty cool, even for a Democrat. Golly, gee whiz, are there supposed to be any similarities drawn between him and Clinton?(I think he stole this movie, BTW).
Gary Oldman as Shelly Runyon, Thinning hair (to be charitable), four-eyed geeky tubercular physique, and quivering jaw, with mean little spitting cobra-like malevolence that only Gary can portray. Oh yes, he plays the EVIL Republican.
Joan Allen...uh, who? What a wussy. Was this the best they could do for a representative of Yearning American Womanhood straining at the Chains of Inequality? For most of the movie, she does nothing to move beyond precisely those reasons that are put forth as Bridge's motivation for nominating her in the first place-namely that he wants a Woman named to the V.P. slot as a part of his "legacy". Not once does he or his chief aide (well played by Sam Eliott) discuss her politics nor is she shown to be any sort of a leader. Mostly, she is so self-effacing; so in awe of all these Big Strong Men, that she makes one ill (snif!). Only towards the end, do you get an idea that maybe she is substantive and that she actually has an opinion on something. They might as well have been picking a S,F and D housefrau out of the phonebook.
Bridges and Eliott seem to regard political investigations as something shameful and dirty and only reluctantly, when they had no other choice, do they finally, reluctantly, (sighing all the way) take advantage of information provided by a plucky (and cute) (OW! take that! sexist pig!) FBI agent. But only in the interest of the American People, you understand...
One last: the ambitious little weasel turncoat representative played by Christian Slater. Does he ever show any emotion besides barely held in eagerness? He seems forever on the verge of anticipating some impending event, like the water bucket above the half-open door trick.
The music was way too loud and way too epic. Way too obvious that this was meant to be a Big Event.
Talk about typecasting: Jeff Bridges as the Prez. Full head of hair, high energy, masculine, physically fit and pretty funny, too. Pretty cool, even for a Democrat. Golly, gee whiz, are there supposed to be any similarities drawn between him and Clinton?(I think he stole this movie, BTW).
Gary Oldman as Shelly Runyon, Thinning hair (to be charitable), four-eyed geeky tubercular physique, and quivering jaw, with mean little spitting cobra-like malevolence that only Gary can portray. Oh yes, he plays the EVIL Republican.
Joan Allen...uh, who? What a wussy. Was this the best they could do for a representative of Yearning American Womanhood straining at the Chains of Inequality? For most of the movie, she does nothing to move beyond precisely those reasons that are put forth as Bridge's motivation for nominating her in the first place-namely that he wants a Woman named to the V.P. slot as a part of his "legacy". Not once does he or his chief aide (well played by Sam Eliott) discuss her politics nor is she shown to be any sort of a leader. Mostly, she is so self-effacing; so in awe of all these Big Strong Men, that she makes one ill (snif!). Only towards the end, do you get an idea that maybe she is substantive and that she actually has an opinion on something. They might as well have been picking a S,F and D housefrau out of the phonebook.
Bridges and Eliott seem to regard political investigations as something shameful and dirty and only reluctantly, when they had no other choice, do they finally, reluctantly, (sighing all the way) take advantage of information provided by a plucky (and cute) (OW! take that! sexist pig!) FBI agent. But only in the interest of the American People, you understand...
One last: the ambitious little weasel turncoat representative played by Christian Slater. Does he ever show any emotion besides barely held in eagerness? He seems forever on the verge of anticipating some impending event, like the water bucket above the half-open door trick.
The music was way too loud and way too epic. Way too obvious that this was meant to be a Big Event.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizGary Oldman and co-producer Douglas Urbanski complained after the film was released that the film was changed from the more balanced script by DreamWorks Pictures to reflect the liberal politics of the studios head at DreamWorks (Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen). The English Oldman, who according to long-time business partner Urbanski is "the least political person I know", was simply contending this since he didn't enjoy how negatively his character was portrayed. DreamWorks vehemently denied tampering with the film.
- BlooperSenator Hanson is seen jogging in what is undoubtedly meant to be Arlington National Cemetery. Jogging is not permitted in Arlington National Cemetery, and presumably a U.S. Senator would know better than to be seen disrespecting American veterans in such a way.
- Citazioni
Laine Hanson: But principles only mean something if you stick by them when they're inconvenient.
- Curiosità sui creditiFor our daughters
- ConnessioniEdited into The Contender: From the Cutting Room Floor (2001)
- Colonne sonoreRing Of Fire
Written by June Carter Cash (as June Carter) and Merle Kilgore
Performed by Jeff Bridges and Kim Carnes
Courtesy Of Ramp Records, LLC.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Contender?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- La conspiración
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 20.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 17.872.723 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 5.363.900 USD
- 15 ott 2000
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 22.428.990 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 6min(126 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti