Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA vampire scientist psychically charges the "longevity serum" he sells across the world, making all who use it into vampires loyal to him.A vampire scientist psychically charges the "longevity serum" he sells across the world, making all who use it into vampires loyal to him.A vampire scientist psychically charges the "longevity serum" he sells across the world, making all who use it into vampires loyal to him.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Mary Louise Gemmill
- Sanda Jensen
- (as Mary-Louise Gemmill)
Christopher Wolf
- Tom
- (as Chris Wolf)
Recensioni in evidenza
How poor is this movie? Well, I got it less than two months ago and can hardly remember what it was about...
I also paid a £1 for this on DVD, the old story of 'put-a-new-cover-on-the-box-and-some-fool-will-buy-it' syndrome. All I really recall it that the cast ran around a lot, use of cars must have been too above the budget and that a vampire was involved. Then again, guess you could know that from the film's title.
Straight to video rubbish or straight to cheap-jack DVD as it is now. This stuff will be in the bargain bins at rental shops, supermarkets and charity shops until the death of the sun. Only cockroaches will rule the earth but this trash will still be around. God bless the dawn of the DVD age....
I also paid a £1 for this on DVD, the old story of 'put-a-new-cover-on-the-box-and-some-fool-will-buy-it' syndrome. All I really recall it that the cast ran around a lot, use of cars must have been too above the budget and that a vampire was involved. Then again, guess you could know that from the film's title.
Straight to video rubbish or straight to cheap-jack DVD as it is now. This stuff will be in the bargain bins at rental shops, supermarkets and charity shops until the death of the sun. Only cockroaches will rule the earth but this trash will still be around. God bless the dawn of the DVD age....
Hands down best film I've seen that came from the bargain basket in poundstretcher. From the talented cast to the rich story i would advise any horror fan to watch this!
My only advice would be to not watch around halloween or with children around as some scenes are truly some of the most bloodiest i have ever seen.
If theres anything i could fault, its that a sequel was never produced although i hold out hope that a potential remake will one day come to surface.
Im currently on my 765th watch and love it that much i give a copy to all my friends and family whenever i see them, even if they do put it straight in the bin.
My only advice would be to not watch around halloween or with children around as some scenes are truly some of the most bloodiest i have ever seen.
If theres anything i could fault, its that a sequel was never produced although i hold out hope that a potential remake will one day come to surface.
Im currently on my 765th watch and love it that much i give a copy to all my friends and family whenever i see them, even if they do put it straight in the bin.
This is an attempt at modernising the traditional vampire legend by having an ancient Austrian blood sucker producing a vampire serum in modern day Los Angeles.
I expected this to be a low budget, bad movie. And it is. Bad acting, cheap sets, laughable car chases and poor effects, terrible continuity, silly plot and a few gratuitous female topless shots thrown in to stimulate some interest. With its mulleted hero and chunky PCs it looks very dated.
Thankfully it is occasionally of the so bad it's amusing variety at times, so I've somewhat generously scored it 3/10 as it did make me chuckle a few times.
A friend of mine loves tacky horror films so I often get to see low budget stuff like this. This is, however the first time I have been compelled to write a review of one...
Put simply this is probably the worst film I have ever seen! Even worse then Boggy Creek II!
The entire budget for the film seems to have been spent on a brief scene in the middle when Dr. Klaus stands in this chamber thing & turns all vampire-ish.
The only good thing to say about it is that it was hilarious after a few beers (but for all the wrong reasons).
Put simply this is probably the worst film I have ever seen! Even worse then Boggy Creek II!
The entire budget for the film seems to have been spent on a brief scene in the middle when Dr. Klaus stands in this chamber thing & turns all vampire-ish.
The only good thing to say about it is that it was hilarious after a few beers (but for all the wrong reasons).
This movie must have had a really low budget, but low doesn't always mean bad. The writing was good, the cinematography is good. The film quality was bad, lighting could have been better. The vampire effects were standard, but the unique concept works. A vampire mad scientist trying to cure the affliction to light so vampires can rule the world. The basic good vs. evil morality play. The acting was a tad corny at best. Less face it, it's far from a perfect movie. But I've seen far worse with much higher budgets. Look at BATTLEFIELD EARTH for example. I think the director, effects man and the whole cast did the best they could with the budget they had and I think they did a damn fine job. I give it...6 STARS
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniReferences La portera ardiente (1989)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Project Vampire (1993) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi