Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaThe hero is an ordinary farmer, Philip Safronov, whose peaceful life is aggressively interrupted when his land is appropriated by a mysterious group to exploit its oil resources.The hero is an ordinary farmer, Philip Safronov, whose peaceful life is aggressively interrupted when his land is appropriated by a mysterious group to exploit its oil resources.The hero is an ordinary farmer, Philip Safronov, whose peaceful life is aggressively interrupted when his land is appropriated by a mysterious group to exploit its oil resources.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 8 vittorie e 5 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Like the cheeky director, Petr Lutsik, this film has some wonderfully bizarre moments, (I think you may be able to label it as surreal). Four farm men hit the road on a journey to the big smoky city and fight the powers that be. A wicked tale about an insane country going through some heavy changes.
It's a very hard movie,and I didn't really find any funny moments-it might be a very peculiar kind of humor which I really don't get.What can I say about Okraina?A very strange movie,somewhere a mix between Tarkovski(the overall mud),Tarantino(the fun of having someone's blood on its clothes),Kurosawa(the gang of men looking for justice),to say nothing about Dziga Vertov,Eisenstein in the expressionistic language.Despite this strange mixture,the movie remains a highly original,and illuminating in understanding why Bakunin,Stalin,the Ukrainian murderers in the Holocaust could exist.It is a movie who needs open-minded,and patient audience.What stunned me-it might be ironic,I hope,it's the collectivist happy end.So,if you love Tarantino,find Tarkovski breathtaking and have nihilistic thoughts,you will like.Others,try it,it might be alright.
I thought this was a really beautiful movie. It is not the type of movie that can be a big commercial success, I don't think you have to be Russian to 'get it'. Actually in general I think it is wrong to try and understand a movie from the supposition that there is only one explanation and one correct interpretation. Obviously it tells us of a barren, vast country, where man struggles with the earth. The imagery is really powerful, it sticks in your head. The actors do a fabulous job. Lighting, decor and photography are just absolutely right there on perfection. I recommend this for people who want a feast for their eyes, mind and soul.
First of all, I'll completely disagree with at least one of the comments that say that it's not a dark comedy. It most certainly is. This particular aspect comes from all the (largely off-screen or implied) violence, which is ALWAYS intended to be funny.
I will agree with all of the comments saying that non-Russians will not get it. It's true. In fact, the subtitles are quite bad... They really miss a lot of the meaning. More importantly, there is so much irony and there are so many references to Russian/Soviet culture that even the more ardent non-Eastern-European Russophile will miss a lot of what makes the movie so great.
On to the actual film-making: On the outside, it might seem like a "heavy" movie that's not for the average person, but - as is the case with most dark comedies - it comes out very light in the end. The pace might be a little slow at times, but it seems like this aspect is one of the many instances of parodies of old Soviet movies. As other reviewers have mentioned, a LOT of the movie's style is very Soviet-like - dark lighting (it might seem noir, but I'd argue that it's just how Soviet films were made), simple editing, amazing deadpan acting.
Simply put, if you know Russian or Soviet culture and cinema culture well enough, this is a very interesting and original movie. Otherwise, I doubt that you'll appreciate it too much.
I will agree with all of the comments saying that non-Russians will not get it. It's true. In fact, the subtitles are quite bad... They really miss a lot of the meaning. More importantly, there is so much irony and there are so many references to Russian/Soviet culture that even the more ardent non-Eastern-European Russophile will miss a lot of what makes the movie so great.
On to the actual film-making: On the outside, it might seem like a "heavy" movie that's not for the average person, but - as is the case with most dark comedies - it comes out very light in the end. The pace might be a little slow at times, but it seems like this aspect is one of the many instances of parodies of old Soviet movies. As other reviewers have mentioned, a LOT of the movie's style is very Soviet-like - dark lighting (it might seem noir, but I'd argue that it's just how Soviet films were made), simple editing, amazing deadpan acting.
Simply put, if you know Russian or Soviet culture and cinema culture well enough, this is a very interesting and original movie. Otherwise, I doubt that you'll appreciate it too much.
In current times,the merits and strengths of Russian cinema are properly assessed only by those foreign critics and viewers who have also evaluated the artistic brilliance of other national cinemas.It is important to know that this trend is happening at a time when for some peculiar reasons Russian audiences have started to ignore the heritage of their own domestic cinema in order to appreciate films from different types of dead woods namely Bollywood and Hollywood.This small review is an earnest attempt to discuss the greatness of Russian cinema.Apart from water,land is recognized as one of the most recognizable universal concepts.As a film, Pyotr Lutsik's Okraina is based on the universal theme of land but chooses to depict an oddball case of land grabbing and its consequences on hapless peasants.This might appear simple to digest but Okraina is absolutely impossible to pigeonhole.Blackest of all black comedies would be the nearest brief plausible description of this film.The film's TOUR DE FORCE consists of some violent scenes which have an absolutely surreal charm.For example- proper attention must be paid to a scene wherein a man disappears in thin air under the ice to reappear after some time from the other side.The film is replete with several humorous scenes of this kind which shock the viewer in a positive sense.It is for this reason that an astute viewer has to marvel at indefatigable efforts by director Pyotr Lutsik who teamed up with his screenwriter colleague late Aleksei Samoryadov(1962-1994).Lastly a word of advice from film critic Mr.Lalit Rao-If a viewer has appreciated this film then the next best step would be to watch Boris Barnet's original Okraina which is considered as one of Russian cinema's greatest classics.
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniReferenced in kuji: Aleksandr Pal: Without the Task of Making People Laugh (2024)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 2797 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 607 USD
- 4 apr 2004
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2797 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti