[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Virtual Sexuality

  • 1999
  • R
  • 1h 32min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,1/10
3119
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Laura Fraser and Rupert Penry-Jones in Virtual Sexuality (1999)
Commedia per adolescentiCommediaDrammaFantascienzaRomanticismo

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA frustrated teenage girl creates her perfect man in a virtual reality machine and in a freak accident, gives him life.A frustrated teenage girl creates her perfect man in a virtual reality machine and in a freak accident, gives him life.A frustrated teenage girl creates her perfect man in a virtual reality machine and in a freak accident, gives him life.

  • Regia
    • Nick Hurran
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Nick Fisher
    • Chloe Rayban
  • Star
    • Laura Fraser
    • Rupert Penry-Jones
    • Luke de Lacey
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    5,1/10
    3119
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Nick Hurran
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Nick Fisher
      • Chloe Rayban
    • Star
      • Laura Fraser
      • Rupert Penry-Jones
      • Luke de Lacey
    • 38Recensioni degli utenti
    • 9Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Video1

    Virtual Sexuality
    Trailer 1:58
    Virtual Sexuality

    Foto19

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 11
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali47

    Modifica
    Laura Fraser
    Laura Fraser
    • Justine
    Rupert Penry-Jones
    Rupert Penry-Jones
    • Jake
    Luke de Lacey
    Luke de Lacey
    • Chas
    Kieran O'Brien
    Kieran O'Brien
    • Alex
    Steve John Shepherd
    Steve John Shepherd
    • Jason
    Marcelle Duprey
    • Fran
    Natasha Bell
    • Hoover
    Laura MacAulay
    • Monica
    Roger Frost
    Roger Frost
    • Frank
    Ruth Sheen
    Ruth Sheen
    • Jackie
    Laura Aikman
    Laura Aikman
    • Lucy
    Ram John Holder
    Ram John Holder
    • Declan
    Amanda Holden
    Amanda Holden
    • Shoe Shop Assistant
    Alan Westaway
    • Geoff
    William Osborne
    • Sex Shop Assistant
    Philip Bird
    Philip Bird
    • David Parker
    Judith Scott
    • Sharon
    Stewart Harwood
    • Labourer #2
    • Regia
      • Nick Hurran
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Nick Fisher
      • Chloe Rayban
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti38

    5,13.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    M_Guerin

    The perfect teen sex comedy for heterosexual girls (and gay men)

    The criticisms thrown at this British film have all missed the point - the filmmakers were trying to create a campy teen sex comedy in the banal and exploitative tradition of American 1980s cinema, but reverse the gender roles so that the girls are the protagonists and the boys do all of the nudity. It's no surprise that it took U.K. filmmakers to achieve this role reversal, largely because U.K. and other Euro films have never shied away from full male nudity, much unlike American filmmakers.

    On this angle, the filmmakers have been absolutely successful. I attended a viewing of this last week in Toronto, and noted the hetero couple sitting in front of me - at the end of the film, the girl seemed slightly amused and aroused, while the boy seemed put out a bit - his facial expression seemed to resemble that of your average straight teenage girl after viewing Porky's or something like that. He seemed annoyed, and frustrated that all the nudity (and there was a lot of it for mainstream film standards) in the film was male.

    Pathetic plot points aside, or bad acting, etc. this film achieves what it wanted to achieve - exploit the male gender in the context of a banal teen sex comedy featuring female protagonists. They weren't going for a logical plot or characters who would intrigue the audience. Who ever cared about the plots of the 1980s American teen sex comedies, anyway?

    The filmmakers achieved their primary purpose with the teenage boy locker room scene, featuring several furtive shots of full frontal nudity. Not to mention, the numerous butt shots of star Rupert Penry-Jones, the dream boat created by the film's virtual reality machine, throughout the entire film.
    5Everwas

    Not a brilliant plot but entertaining nonetheless

    Nobody that sees this movie will tell you that the plot is spectacular or brilliant, but I think most people will be fairly entertained by it. There are, as in most movies, some slow times or failures, but there are some interesting developments dealing with the main characters, primarily how the girl acts in her new body as a guy. It's really a toss up whether or not the movie is worth seeing. If you're in the mood for a fairly simple but mostly entertaining film, go ahead and check it out. If you prefer heavy or artistic movies with flawless and deep plots, you should probably avoid this one. It is also worth noting that the English accent is sometimes hard to understand, so if that annoys you, this movie will too.
    ouija-5

    Starts out funny enough...

    While the premise of this film has been done, it starts out with enough freshness and humor to keep you watching. Justine's early escapades inside the body of her own "perfect man" are quite humorous and Rupert Penry-Jones as Jake does a great job portraying a man, with the "personality" of a teenage girl, Justine. But past the halfway mark this film loses complete direction. We grow to really like the endearing Jake, but we discover that Justine is also a separate entity to him, (i.e. the machine made a double of Justine as a man, so there are two of them, one male, one female). And then the film follows Justine in her efforts to snag Jake, (as she doesn't know he is really her). The movie tries to make her the central character again, and fails because we really don't care anymore -- she's hardly as interesting. It also takes a detour at the moment when some intriguing and more controversial issues are about to be raised. Jake is being seduced by a girl at school that everyone calls, "hoover",(take a guess why), and after she spends sometime kissing him on the street, we never see her again. It raises an interesting question of sexual preference, i.e. justine inside a man's body being attracted to a woman, but the movie skirts the issue, wanting instead to regress into a high school soap opera. At the close of the film Jake is deleted in a quick wrap-up effort to make this a movie about loving yourself and waiting to lose your virginity to a "nice guy," who may not have the looks, but has the personality. Its hokey sub-plot about the scientists trying to recapture Jake to perform scientific experiments on him only hinders the movie even more, making certain scenes into a slapstick comedy. Its unfortunate that something could start out interesting enough and plummet so quickly. But the first half-an-hour is worth watching, if for nothing else than Rupert Penry-Jones (Jake)as he "explores" his new masculine body.
    4rob-236

    Not that good but watchable.

    A British teen movies which centres around a girl (Justine) accidentally creating her dream man (Jake) in by the use of a virtual reality machine, there is only one problem (well….not just one…) she gets trapped inside his body with a geek as the only person who knows the truth and the only person she can trust. It sounds a lot worse than it is, I found it more watchable for the reason that Laura Fraser was starring in it more than the film content, indeed she looks stunning throughout especially when she dresses in a red lycra dress in order to impress Jake, WOW!!, If only I had a virtual reality machine
    6inkblot11

    A lousy title, but the story has its moments

    Justine is still waiting for her first real romantic encounter. She has had opportunities but has skipped them, for she longs for the whole package; that is, true love. When she goes to a technology fair with a friend named Chas, she enters a booth and is urged to "create" a perfect male for herself on screen. Yet, a freak accident results in her newly fangled male, Jake, to pop out of the screen and be a living specimen. However, he does not want anything to do with Justine. Justine is in despair and resolves she'll "just get it over with" with someone else. No, no Justine! Don't do it! This is a British film with some good moments. Watch Justine on her actual dream date, riding down the Thames in a boat, for example. Now that's lovely. The young actors are all adept, although the man playing Jake did not seem like a "dreamboat" to me. The London setting is fun and the dialogue perky, although there is some bad language thrown in. All in all, do you think you've seen all of the romantic comedies in existence? You have not, if you've missed this one. Look beyond its bad title and give it a whirl for an evening. You might be pleasantly surprised at how likable the film is.

    Altri elementi simili

    Threeway
    5,6
    Threeway
    La prima volta di Niky
    5,8
    La prima volta di Niky
    L'amante di Lady Chatterley
    5,1
    L'amante di Lady Chatterley
    Burn It
    8,4
    Burn It
    To kalokairi tis Karmen
    6,7
    To kalokairi tis Karmen
    Paris, Brixton
    6,4
    Paris, Brixton
    Neverwhere
    7,2
    Neverwhere
    Left Luggage
    7,2
    Left Luggage
    Burn Up
    6,7
    Burn Up
    North Square
    8,0
    North Square
    Plein Sud - Andando a sud
    5,8
    Plein Sud - Andando a sud
    Blackmail Boys
    4,2
    Blackmail Boys

    Interessi correlati

    Lacey Chabert, Lindsay Lohan, Rachel McAdams, and Amanda Seyfried in Mean Girls (2004)
    Commedia per adolescenti
    Will Ferrell in Anchorman - La leggenda di Ron Burgundy (2004)
    Commedia
    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight (2016)
    Dramma
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in L'Impero colpisce ancora (1980)
    Fantascienza
    Ingrid Bergman and Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca (1942)
    Romanticismo

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      The film features the first nude scene for Kieran O'Brien, who subsequently starred in the UK's most sexually explicit film to receive a mainstream certification, 9 canzoni (2004).
    • Citazioni

      [Talking about the differences between teen boys and girls]

      Justine: Girls can laugh till they wet their pants together, why can't boys do that too?

    • Versioni alternative
      The imposing "magic marker" lines over the guys' genitals in the locker room were ostensibly placed there to avoid an "NC-17" rating.
    • Connessioni
      Featured in Beyond Clueless (2014)
    • Colonne sonore
      Toy
      Written by Moa, Eythor Arnalds

      Performed by Moa

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti17

    • How long is Virtual Sexuality?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 19 maggio 2000 (Italia)
    • Paese di origine
      • Regno Unito
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Sexualitat virtual
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Londra, Inghilterra, Regno Unito
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Columbia Pictures
      • The Noel Gay Motion Picture Company
      • TriStar Pictures
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 74.007 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 43.865 USD
      • 5 dic 1999
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 74.007 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 32min(92 min)
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.