Le invenzioni dello scienziato Sherman Klump, il suo imminente matrimonio con la sua graziosa collega Denise Gaines e la sua reputazione sono minacciati dal suo malvagio clone Buddy Love.Le invenzioni dello scienziato Sherman Klump, il suo imminente matrimonio con la sua graziosa collega Denise Gaines e la sua reputazione sono minacciati dal suo malvagio clone Buddy Love.Le invenzioni dello scienziato Sherman Klump, il suo imminente matrimonio con la sua graziosa collega Denise Gaines e la sua reputazione sono minacciati dal suo malvagio clone Buddy Love.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 15 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
The sad thing is, more fart humor would have been an *improvement.* This movie was boring. It was uninteresting. It missed numerous opportunities to have some fun. And it spent too much time showing off make-up and not enough time being entertaining.
Perhaps most painful to watch was Eddie Murphy just being Eddie Murphy (as Buddy Love). I never understand why some actors/directors think that if a character screams real loud and makes a face, it's funny. It is especially not funny when it happens 2-3 times. In the first movie, Buddy Love was funny (if cruel), and his observations were right on target. In The Klumps, Love is like a grown version of that Home Alone kid, when he grabs his face and just yells at the camera. Uh, if you are done shouting now, can we move on?
Janet Jackson was fluff. And I don't know what she has done with her chest, but it seems unusually huge here.
I suppose it would be appropriate to say how well done the make up is as Murphy plays his half-dozen or so characters. Yes, he makes them seem like different people, at least superficially. But none of the characters are really there, you know? They each have little tag lines, and maybe a quirk, and those lines and that quirk are used to death. Take the granny. Yep, she likes sex. She is a sex machine. She wants every man. OK, uh, so? We've seen that 20 times. Can we get to something new?
Overall, I feel sad to see the level Murphy's wit has been reduced to. He used to be more biting, more insightful and more, well, funny. Now he is a human cartoon. I gave this movie a 4.
The original was a definite success and featured one of Eddie Murphy's career-best performances. Unfortunately, the follow-up is little more than a lazy cash-grab that sucks the life out of the previously hilarious Klumps with a barrage of crass toilet humour. The storyline is absolutely atrocious and it culminates in a completely nonsensical ending. Murphy does just enough to make this film watchable but even he can't make up for such a bad script.
If you enjoyed the first movie, you'd be better off re-watching it than putting yourself through this. Really lame stuff and a massive insult to its excellent predecessor.
"The Nutty Professor" (1996) was okay because of the use of the Klump family who appeared throughout the movie every so often breaking it up with some humorous scenes. In "The Klumps", the family were over used and relied on for all the laughs, but instead just became sickening and in turn extremely boring. I understand using the Klump family was the idea for the sequel, it's just that it doesn't come close to working.
This is not to say that there aren't funny scenes in the movie. Again, I thought the best scene was the entire Klump family going out to dinner and all the hi-jinks that ensue. And there were other funny moments scattered throughout the film, but not enough for me to really get into the movie and enjoy it. Basically it was a moment to moment film, not an overall enjoyment film. Eddie Murphy is amazing, and Martin Lawrence has got nothing on dressing up as a fat woman, but it's just not enough. The Klumps is something you can rent for a quiet evening at home.
For me, the biggest disappointment was the "family" scenes in which Murphy plays almost all the roles including old ladies. In the first film, some of that was absolutely hilarious, the highlight of the movie. Here, that isn't the case. Also, some of the dialog is almost impossible to decipher. It's also too raunchy and this film should have been rated "R." A PG-13 rating is ridiculous with all the emphasis on sex. I hate to see kids watch movies like this.
Still, this had a decent share of funny moments. Also, to its credit, it is not as mean-spirited as the first film turned out to be. Still, the bad outweighs the good. It needed to be funnier, and less raunchy.
Eddie Murphy Through the Years
Eddie Murphy Through the Years
Lo sapevi?
- QuizKathleen Freeman, who plays the nosy neighbor, was in the original Le folli notti del dottor Jerryll (1963) as Millie Lemmon.
- BlooperInstances where two characters played by 'Eddie Murphy' get too close to one another, the characters will sometimes mesh together. One instance can be seen when Mama and Papa are hugging in kitchen. Another instance can be seen in the very beginning of the restaurant scene as Mama places a plate of food down beside Sherman, her right hand meshes with Sherman's left hand, which is rested on the table.
- Citazioni
Dean Richmond: Deals come and go. Wellman will always be Wellman. But you know what bothers me? I walking down the street and this 8-year old boy says, Look Mommy, there's the Hamster's BITCH!
- Curiosità sui creditiOuttakes are shown during the end credits, just like the previous film.
- Versioni alternativeA longer unrated 'uncensored director's cut' featuring alternate, raunchier footage and uncensored outtakes was released onto DVDs.
- ConnessioniEdited from The Day After - Il giorno dopo (1983)
- Colonne sonoreOh Happy Day
Written by Philip Doddridge and Edward F. Rimbault
Arranged by Edwin Hawkins
Written by Edwin Hawkins
Conducted by David Lawrence
I più visti
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 84.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 123.309.890 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 42.518.830 USD
- 30 lug 2000
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 166.339.890 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 46 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1