Le invenzioni dello scienziato Sherman Klump, il suo imminente matrimonio con la sua graziosa collega Denise Gaines e la sua reputazione sono minacciati dal suo malvagio clone Buddy Love.Le invenzioni dello scienziato Sherman Klump, il suo imminente matrimonio con la sua graziosa collega Denise Gaines e la sua reputazione sono minacciati dal suo malvagio clone Buddy Love.Le invenzioni dello scienziato Sherman Klump, il suo imminente matrimonio con la sua graziosa collega Denise Gaines e la sua reputazione sono minacciati dal suo malvagio clone Buddy Love.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 15 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Overall, this is not a bad movie, not great, but not at all terrible.
6/10 Bethany Cox
The humor is lowbrow and delivers a good deal of physical comedy laced with sexual innuendo. Though Murphy's caricatures are consistently droll, they rely too much on unflattering stereotypes of blacks. The first dinner scene is a rehash of the dinner scene from the first film. After that scene, most of the film is a repetition of the same tired sight gags. Though Murphy's amusing electricity runs through every character, once the novelty wears off the film's appeal wears thin.
Kudos to the makeup department for an outstanding job on Murphy's various alter egos. Otherwise, the production of this film was nothing out of the ordinary. Larry Miller also gets a very honorable mention as the obnoxious Dean Richmond, getting his just deserts at the hands of a giant hamster.
This film has some laughs but not enough substance for a feature length movie. I rated it a 6/10. Add two or three points if you are an Eddie Murphy fan.
Rating: **1/2 (out of 4)
Review: I've never been a die-hard Eddie Murphy fan, but that's of course not to say that he isn't funny or endearing, either. TRADING PLACES has always been my favorite Murphy movie, with the original BEVERLY HILLS COP a close second. He's a funny guy, and he has come further than he ever has had before with NUTTY II. The original 1996 film was both funny and enjoyable, if having the distinction of having occasional unnecessary bathroom humor. NUTTY II, however, is taken to extremes with the bathroom humor, everywhere from Grandma Klump giving Buddy Love oral sex in a hot tub to a hamster growing to epic proportions giving anal sex to Klump's boss, this film revels in bad taste way too much. Is the film funny? Sure it is, and it would have been a lot funnier if not for all the sickenening humor that we've seen dozens of times before (I don't blame Murphy particularly for this, considering the script was co-written by the guys who wrote AMERICAN PIE, and directed by Peter Segal, who has had his fair share of films with the same type of humor). They don't make the sick humor at least clever, which is the problem. THERE'S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY and BASEKETBALL made their bathroom humor clever, but NUTTY II doesn't.
Murphy fans are sure to love this, though, because I was telling the truth before about him coming further than he ever has before. Playing no less than 8 roles (this might be some kind of record), his main character is Sherman Klump, a charmingly overweight professor who, in the original wanted to get rid of all the weight and became a stud in Buddy Love to make a beautiful co-ed (Jada Pinkett, whose missing prescence in the sequel is annoyingly unexplained) and eventually learns in the end that you should be yourself and that personality is way more important about looks. In the sequel, he can't shake off the DNA that Buddy has left inside of him, so he decides to attempt to get rid of it, but Buddy eventually (and predictably) regenerates himself with a new thing on his mind. Sherman, apparantly, has discovered the fountain of youth, and now Buddy is going to stop him and take the invention to his own credit. This film, apart from the original, focuses more on Sherman's family, right down to their gluttonous eating habits to their sexual fantasies. That's basically the whole plot in a nutshell. As I've said before, Murphy is terrific, and he's well worth watching in his eight roles, but this film will turn off a lot of viewers because all the sick humor, which I must say is more silly than funny, yet you find yourself for some reason still laughing to it (or rather, at it). Janet Jackson, as Eddie's love interest here, is OK, but she seems to be more important to the audience (any audience, not just the African-American audience) as a male fantasy figure than an actress. Overall, I'm looking at this film as another one to add to Murphy's list of commercial successes that is funny enough to make him a respectable comedian, but for once I want him to go more towards not grossing us out and finding a concept to appeal to anyone and everyone.
The original was a definite success and featured one of Eddie Murphy's career-best performances. Unfortunately, the follow-up is little more than a lazy cash-grab that sucks the life out of the previously hilarious Klumps with a barrage of crass toilet humour. The storyline is absolutely atrocious and it culminates in a completely nonsensical ending. Murphy does just enough to make this film watchable but even he can't make up for such a bad script.
If you enjoyed the first movie, you'd be better off re-watching it than putting yourself through this. Really lame stuff and a massive insult to its excellent predecessor.
"The Nutty Professor" (1996) was okay because of the use of the Klump family who appeared throughout the movie every so often breaking it up with some humorous scenes. In "The Klumps", the family were over used and relied on for all the laughs, but instead just became sickening and in turn extremely boring. I understand using the Klump family was the idea for the sequel, it's just that it doesn't come close to working.
Eddie Murphy Through the Years
Eddie Murphy Through the Years
Lo sapevi?
- QuizKathleen Freeman, who plays the nosy neighbor, was in the original Le folli notti del dottor Jerryll (1963) as Millie Lemmon.
- BlooperInstances where two characters played by 'Eddie Murphy' get too close to one another, the characters will sometimes mesh together. One instance can be seen when Mama and Papa are hugging in kitchen. Another instance can be seen in the very beginning of the restaurant scene as Mama places a plate of food down beside Sherman, her right hand meshes with Sherman's left hand, which is rested on the table.
- Citazioni
Dean Richmond: Deals come and go. Wellman will always be Wellman. But you know what bothers me? I walking down the street and this 8-year old boy says, Look Mommy, there's the Hamster's BITCH!
- Curiosità sui creditiOuttakes are shown during the end credits, just like the previous film.
- Versioni alternativeA longer unrated 'uncensored director's cut' featuring alternate, raunchier footage and uncensored outtakes was released onto DVDs.
- ConnessioniEdited from The Day After - Il giorno dopo (1983)
- Colonne sonoreOh Happy Day
Written by Philip Doddridge and Edward F. Rimbault
Arranged by Edwin Hawkins
Written by Edwin Hawkins
Conducted by David Lawrence
I più visti
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 84.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 123.309.890 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 42.518.830 USD
- 30 lug 2000
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 166.339.890 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 46 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1