Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaThe first interplanetary cruise ship malfunctions halfway to Jupiter, forcing most of the crew and passengers to abandon ship. A handful of people are trapped onboard.The first interplanetary cruise ship malfunctions halfway to Jupiter, forcing most of the crew and passengers to abandon ship. A handful of people are trapped onboard.The first interplanetary cruise ship malfunctions halfway to Jupiter, forcing most of the crew and passengers to abandon ship. A handful of people are trapped onboard.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Kristine DeBell
- Fiona
- (as Kristine De Bell)
Jordan Michals
- Lima
- (as Jordan Michaels)
Neil Ross
- Main Cerebral
- (voce)
- (as Neilson Ross)
Patti Glick
- Felix
- (voce)
Recensioni in evidenza
Arcturus is a civilian spaceship on its maiden voyage to Jupiter. There are some 3000 passengers aboard. There is a mysterious distress signal and most are abandoning ship. Crew member Simmons (Joe Penny) gathers various people as he searches for a way to a lifepod.
I remember Joe Penny from 80's TV and a few of the actors seem familiar. The production designs look 70's or very early 80's. There is no action other than shaking the camera in the third act. This is no Titanic. The miniature work is fine. The story is something about computer, but it's sorta non-sense. It can't really get above its low production value.
I remember Joe Penny from 80's TV and a few of the actors seem familiar. The production designs look 70's or very early 80's. There is no action other than shaking the camera in the third act. This is no Titanic. The miniature work is fine. The story is something about computer, but it's sorta non-sense. It can't really get above its low production value.
Life Pod is one of those films to watch out for, should it appear on your local cable station's movie listings late at night. Those who dismiss it in the first glance will miss an unusually compelling, worthwhile science fiction film that belies its low-budget origin.
Let's briefly rattle off some of it's merits:
~It's got no annoying loopholes; everything works and makes sense. Odd how a 'small' movie can sometimes do this better than a big-budget production.
~The special effects don't get in the way of the story. And there is quite good photography, too.
~The narrative itself, focuses on a human situation, rather than being pointlessly technological, or un-engaging fantasy. It's the same foundation that made 'Alien' great. People are at the heart of this movie.
~Set design is complementary in that is innocuous, unobtrusive, measured. Again, properly servile to the plot.
~The actors are all low-budget actors from TV land. Once again, a case of "less is more". They are unknowns, so they are abstracted for the viewer, and this allows for fluid, accessible characterizations.
~Pacing is efficient, economical, simple, and linear, with no waste. The director takes us exactly to the emotional climax comfortably and confidently.
With all that said, I think its just a great little sci-fi story: an intriguing plot that, humbly executed in a no-frills manner, sticks with you over time. I would love to have this in my collection.
Let's briefly rattle off some of it's merits:
~It's got no annoying loopholes; everything works and makes sense. Odd how a 'small' movie can sometimes do this better than a big-budget production.
~The special effects don't get in the way of the story. And there is quite good photography, too.
~The narrative itself, focuses on a human situation, rather than being pointlessly technological, or un-engaging fantasy. It's the same foundation that made 'Alien' great. People are at the heart of this movie.
~Set design is complementary in that is innocuous, unobtrusive, measured. Again, properly servile to the plot.
~The actors are all low-budget actors from TV land. Once again, a case of "less is more". They are unknowns, so they are abstracted for the viewer, and this allows for fluid, accessible characterizations.
~Pacing is efficient, economical, simple, and linear, with no waste. The director takes us exactly to the emotional climax comfortably and confidently.
With all that said, I think its just a great little sci-fi story: an intriguing plot that, humbly executed in a no-frills manner, sticks with you over time. I would love to have this in my collection.
The last of the Sandler/Emenegger sci-fi films comes as something of a relief to me as all of these movies have been poor quality, low budget science fiction efforts in which the level of imagination involved counts for nothing when so little money has gone into the production. They're also all entirely derivative, with this one tackling 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY for inspiration.
Once again the film's main antagonist is a computer, a rather open rip-off of HAL 9000 although without the same quality of the voice acting. A desperate crew are trapped aboard a space ship with time running out (just like in ALIEN) and must figure out a way to work together in order to survive and/or escape.
Like the rest of these movies, the cast is unknown, the quality of the acting is very poor, and the script is sub-par. I appreciate that this one seems to have a little higher budget than others like LABORATORY and CAPTIVE so it's a pity they picked a script that was so derivative. For a change, it's not Robert Emenegger or Allan Sandler directing; instead that job goes to first-timer Bruce Bryant, and he doesn't make much of an effort really.
Once again the film's main antagonist is a computer, a rather open rip-off of HAL 9000 although without the same quality of the voice acting. A desperate crew are trapped aboard a space ship with time running out (just like in ALIEN) and must figure out a way to work together in order to survive and/or escape.
Like the rest of these movies, the cast is unknown, the quality of the acting is very poor, and the script is sub-par. I appreciate that this one seems to have a little higher budget than others like LABORATORY and CAPTIVE so it's a pity they picked a script that was so derivative. For a change, it's not Robert Emenegger or Allan Sandler directing; instead that job goes to first-timer Bruce Bryant, and he doesn't make much of an effort really.
This one isn't as bad as some people make it out to be. Sure, it's a very low-budget flick and the acting is pretty cheesy/subpar, but the concept is actually really engaging. There definitely needed to be a more stern hand in the editing room, in my opinion, because there are too many instances that feel like filler.
I still recommend this flick even with its numerous faults. If you enjoy cheap sci-fi, this may just be right up your ally.
I still recommend this flick even with its numerous faults. If you enjoy cheap sci-fi, this may just be right up your ally.
I like this forgotten little gem. The opening 'commercial' is reminiscent of a similar technique in Futureworld. Of course the computer-run-amok theme is not new, but a nice electronic soundtrack combined with an overall soundscape of computer voices and radio transmissions create a soothing mood piece of sci-fi escapism. Everything here is in a futuristic font with names like Arcturus, Cycloid, and two computers named FLX (Felix) and the Master Cerebral. Whole film is done very seriously with no attempts at comic relief. I did wonder how that rolling robot ('mechanical') got through the doorways though, since it would have to step up and over the portal-type entrances. I recommend closing your eyes, turning the volume way up, and floating away with this one.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to the advertisement at the beginning of the film, the year is 2191.
- BlooperAs on ships, the bottom of the door frames are raised off the bottom of the floor, so that they can make a perfect seal with the doors, in case of accidental decompression, probably. So the robot with wheels, which is shown on either side of the doors, cannot possibly make it through the doorway.
- Curiosità sui creditiOpening credits prologue advertisement for space travel: ARCTURUS
SEE YOUR TRAVEL AGENT © 2191 *Whitestar II International Spacelines Inc.
- ConnessioniRemake of I prigionieri dell'oceano (1944)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Lifepod?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti