Una subdola bomba del sesso, ruba i soldi della droga di suo marito e si nasconde in una piccola città dove incontra lo stupido perfetto per il suo prossimo piano.Una subdola bomba del sesso, ruba i soldi della droga di suo marito e si nasconde in una piccola città dove incontra lo stupido perfetto per il suo prossimo piano.Una subdola bomba del sesso, ruba i soldi della droga di suo marito e si nasconde in una piccola città dove incontra lo stupido perfetto per il suo prossimo piano.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Nominato ai 1 BAFTA Award
- 9 vittorie e 10 candidature totali
- Stacy
- (as Donna Wilson)
- Mail Boy
- (as Bill Stevenson)
Recensioni in evidenza
In fact, I have no other adjectives for Bridget Gregory, a woman who looks angelic and the kind of wife our mother always dreamed of for us, until we see her dark side. The film elaborates a web of intrigue and malice where Bridget is the main character, the spider in the middle of the web, ready to devour his male prey. She was married to a guy who traffics in drugs, but decides to run away and take with her a huge amount of trafficking money, which infuriates her husband (any husband, I think). She hides in a small town where she decides to settle down without being noticed. She meets Mike Swale and quickly becomes involved with him, to the point of convincing him to kill her husband... without him knowing that he is, in fact, her husband.
The success of the film is largely based on a well-written script by Steve Barancik and a very intelligent direction by John Dahl. Some scenes, like the bar scene where Mike tries to seduce Bridget and ends up seduced by her, are truly anthological, and although this is not a very explicit film (some teen films show much more skin than this one), it gives us with some of the most perverse and hotest sex scenes in cinema (regular commercial cinema, I'm not taking into account porn films), not so much for what it shows but for the intensity, beauty and commitment of the cast.
In the middle of the cast only one name stands out and it is around him that the whole film is built: Linda Fiorentino got, with this film, the most remarkable work of her career. She is viciously wicked, cruel, cynical, malevolent and highly seductive. The way she worked on the character is almost palpable. Bill Pullman and Peter Berg are also very good and interact perfectly with Fiorentino, but she is the one who carries the lead and makes the whole movie work.
Being a film that is a neo-noir with touches of satirical comedy in the middle, the most notable technical aspect is clearly cinematography, which wisely uses light and shadow. However, it is not a film as dark as most noir films, nor as dark in the way it approaches themes. The comedy is there, the satire is present and it lightens the atmosphere, makes the film more fun and less dense. The dialogues are incredible and deserve our full attention, as well as the scenarios and the superb soundtrack, by Joseph Vitarelli.
It's rare that a film has a strong female lead and is successful female roles are hard to come by. Here this film is based around the ultimate femme fatale (or b***h as she's called here) and the story is clever and sexy. Bridget appears to be cold and manipulative and every frame of the film confirms that. The story is clever and twisty very enjoyable, right up to the end where you can't help but feel sorry for anyone that tries to stop her getting her way.
Fiorento is excellent and has yet to get as good a role since. She is sexy and manipulative and totally believable. Berg is good as the backwater boy who gets taken for a ride. Bill Pullman is good in a smaller role (he only once is seen outside of his apartment). While Bill Nunn and J.T. Walsh (when will I stop feeling his loss?) add class in roles that almost count as cameos they are so small.
Dark, wicked, sexy and intelligently twisty. Modern noir at it's best .but did we really need a sequel?
How many times have we cheered on a bad guy despite ourselves, even though we know he's bad, just because he's so charming and sexy? Why not the same of a woman? She's evil, she's manipulative, she gets what she wants. I love it. Would I want to meet someone like this in real life? Of course not. Do I find her behavior acceptable? Of course not, it's absolutely reprehensible. But this is a movie, it's entertainment, and the world is already full of bad-guys-get-it-in-the-end fantasies, orgies of violence that are only excused by the fact that the person being destroyed is a "bad guy" - why can't I relish in a fantasy of a brilliant and amoral woman triumphing over the stupid and trusting (and yes, people can really be that stupid, even smart people.) We want to believe in the essential goodness of mankind, but unfortunately, in the real world as in this movie, villains often capitalize on that need to believe for their own benefit.
Linda Fiorentino is absolutely amazing in this movie, I really wish she would get more work, her talents are completely underutilized. Sexy, smart, and in control. Bill Pullman is his usual wonderful self, and there are many other excellent supporting performances from the likes of J.T. Walsh (RIP) and Peter Berg.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPeter Berg recalled the chain-link-fence sex scene with Linda Fiorentino: "What I remember most about it was we were shooting it at the end of the night. We never got a chance to talk about how we were going to do it. By the time we got outside to shoot, it was like 5 in the morning and the sun was coming up. We had no plan and I didn't want to do something that looked embarrassing or stupid. I didn't want to appear to be just this designated sex-toy without some plan. I was suggesting that we maybe come back another day to shoot. John Dahl was upset because he knew he didn't have the time to come back, and I was being all nervous, and Linda was just smoking a cigarette, watching. After about ten minutes of me rambling on, she threw down the cigarette, looked at me, told me to shut the fuck up, take my pants down, and get up against the fence. She said, 'John, get a camera,' and she climbed up on me against that fence and told John Dahl to shoot it, and that was the scene. She thought of it, she conceived it, she executed it. It was awesome."
- BlooperJust before Bridget sees the fuel gauge is empty, she is smoking. After cutting to the close-up of the gauge and then back to Bridget, her cigarette has disappeared.
- Citazioni
Bridget Gregory: Could you leave? Please?
Mike Swale: I haven't finished charming you yet.
Bridget Gregory: You haven't started.
Mike Swale: Gimme a chance.
Bridget Gregory: Look, go find yourself a nice little cowgirl and make nice little cowbabies and leave me alone.
Mike Swale: I'm hung like a horse. Think about it.
[pause]
Bridget Gregory: Let's see.
Mike Swale: Excuse me?
Bridget Gregory: Mr. Ed, let's see.
Mike Swale: Look, I tried to be nice. I can see that's something you're not...
Bridget Gregory: No, I'm trying. I can be very nice when I try. Sit down.
Mike Swale: OK, maybe we just got off to a bad start. I know plenty of people -
[Bridget unzips his fly]
Mike Swale: What are you doing?
Bridget Gregory: I believe what we're looking for is a certain horse-like quality?
- Versioni alternativeAn extended version re-adds approximately 25 minutes of deleted scenes. However, the scenes are lower resolution, have had no post production, and even include on-screen timecode, interfering with the flow and tone.
- Colonne sonoreGroove Me
Written by The ElderGreens
Performed by The ElderGreens
I più visti
- How long is The Last Seduction?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 2.500.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 5.842.603 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 45.058 USD
- 30 ott 1994
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 5.842.603 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 50 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1