Quando Nicole ha incontrato David, era tutto quello che potesse desiderare. Sembrava perfetto, ma presto scopre che David ha un lato oscuro. La sua adorazione si trasforma in ossessione, il ... Leggi tuttoQuando Nicole ha incontrato David, era tutto quello che potesse desiderare. Sembrava perfetto, ma presto scopre che David ha un lato oscuro. La sua adorazione si trasforma in ossessione, il loro sogno in un incubo e il suo amore in paura.Quando Nicole ha incontrato David, era tutto quello che potesse desiderare. Sembrava perfetto, ma presto scopre che David ha un lato oscuro. La sua adorazione si trasforma in ossessione, il loro sogno in un incubo e il suo amore in paura.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 2 candidature totali
- Eddie Clark
- (as John Oliver)
- Counterman
- (as Ravinder Toor)
Recensioni in evidenza
Excellent acting from both Mark Wahlberg and Reese Witherspoon. Both so young in this film, and also still acting today. I could easily say that Fear features possibly one of the best performances from the pair of them. Wahlberg's ability to play a psychopath so easily, and convincingly is amazing. Witherspoon's naivety as a sixteen year old girl, was also incredibly outstanding. Both Wahlberg and Witherspoon are household names now, that almost everyone had heard of, yet in this film they were both new and unknown. Excellent way to pave a career guys.
OK, it's no masterpiece and the plot is very familiar, but I was never bored. It's well-directed (especially a roller coaster ride), has beautiful scenery and architecture (look at the house where Witherspoon lives with her family) and a script that, if not always credible, never stops moving. The last 20 minutes really rock. A little unpleasant at times though. As for the acting--Witherspoon is OK. At times, she's totally believable--other times she's not. And she's obviously over 17. Petersen is very good playing the understanding, protective dad. A nice, understated performance. Mark Wahlberg is (surprisingly) very good as the psycho. He plays the nice guy and the evil guy very effectively. REALLY nice bod too--what a chest! But he needs some serious voice lessons--his Boston accent kept creeping in. So, a pretty good thriller. You could do worse.
While not being a classic thriller FEAR certainly did hold my attention , probably because much of the characterisation is credible . All too often in this genre the actor or actress playing the villain really goes to town showing the audience what a bad ass they are thereby parodying the role . Mark Wahlberg as David is very restrained for the most part which makes David and credible character and his on screen chemistry with Reese Witherspoon's Nicole is believable , you can believe these two characters are genuinely in love with one another something that is all too rare in this type of movie
I should also point out that much of the movie revolves around the interaction of Petersen's Mr Walker who is concerned about his daughter's relationship with David . You can't blame the guy for wanting what's best for his offspring and it enhances the credibility of the story . It's refreshing to have a more thoughtful approach to this type of genre because if people start turning up dead after 15 minutes then things start to get silly , so the violence is kept to a minimum until almost at the end of the movie which does suffer something of a plot hole because no one seems to have a mobile telephone at readily hand and don't tell me professional people didn't have mobile phones in 1996 . Also watch out for references to STRAW DOGS , THE SHINING and NOSFERATU at the climax
Even if you're burned out on those 90s stalker from hell thrillers you could do worse than watch this on a wet Friday evening
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLeonardo DiCaprio was looked at for the role of David McCall, DiCaprio didn't think he was right for the role, but he put in a good word for friend/co-star Mark Wahlberg to director James Foley after working with him on Ritorno dal nulla (1995). Foley and Wahlberg spent the day hanging out and discussing the part before Wahlberg was later told by Foley that he really liked him but that he wouldn't be considered for the lead role of David McCall. Wahlberg was subsequently offered to come in to audition for one of David's criminal friends and impressed Foley so much with his audition that Foley told the studio that he would back out of directing the movie if Wahlberg didn't get to play David.
- BlooperWhen David hits himself in the chest repeatedly after he talks with Mr. Walker, Nicole comes home and tells her dad that she saw bruises all over his chest, but shortly after David carves "Nicole 4 Eva" on his chest, there are no bruises or any marks.
- Citazioni
David McCall: [At the door] It could have all been different, Mr. Walker. You should have allowed nature to take its course. In the end, it will anyway.
[pause]
David McCall: SO LET ME IN THE FUCKIN' HOUSE!
- Colonne sonoreJessica
Written by Dickey Betts
Performed by The Allman Brothers Band
Courtesy of Polydor Records
By Arrangement with PolyGram Special Markets
Unichappell Music, Inc. & F.R. Betts Music Co.
All Rights Administered by Unichappell Music, Inc. (BMI)
I più visti
- How long is Fear?Powered by Alexa
- Why are the police searching the water when the ending credits begin to roll? Did David's body go missing? Did they cut out a final scene where David wakes up miraculously and sneaks away in the water? Did the tide wash away his body? Please explain if someone knows? Or maybe this is another goof?
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Miedo
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 20.831.000 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 6.312.240 USD
- 14 apr 1996
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 20.831.000 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 37 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1