[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario usciteI 250 migliori filmFilm più popolariCerca film per genereI migliori IncassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie filmIndia Film Spotlight
    Cosa c’è in TV e streamingLe 250 migliori serie TVSerie TV più popolariCerca serie TV per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareUltimi trailerOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcast IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsPremiazioniFestivalTutti gli eventi
    Nati oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona collaboratoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista dei Preferiti
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Doctor Who

  • Film per la TV
  • 1996
  • TV-14
  • 1h 29min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,3/10
11.056
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Eric Roberts, Paul McGann, Daphne Ashbrook, and Yee Jee Tso in Doctor Who (1996)
Space Sci-FiTime TravelAdventureDramaSci-Fi

Un appena rigenerato Dottore deve fermare il Maestro che, tentando di ottenere delle nuove rigenerazioni, rischia di distruggere l'intero pianeta Terra.Un appena rigenerato Dottore deve fermare il Maestro che, tentando di ottenere delle nuove rigenerazioni, rischia di distruggere l'intero pianeta Terra.Un appena rigenerato Dottore deve fermare il Maestro che, tentando di ottenere delle nuove rigenerazioni, rischia di distruggere l'intero pianeta Terra.

  • Regia
    • Geoffrey Sax
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Matthew Jacobs
    • Sydney Newman
    • Donald Wilson
  • Star
    • Paul McGann
    • Eric Roberts
    • Daphne Ashbrook
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    6,3/10
    11.056
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Geoffrey Sax
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Matthew Jacobs
      • Sydney Newman
      • Donald Wilson
    • Star
      • Paul McGann
      • Eric Roberts
      • Daphne Ashbrook
    • 137Recensioni degli utenti
    • 27Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale

    Foto44

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 37
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali21

    Modifica
    Paul McGann
    Paul McGann
    • The Doctor
    Eric Roberts
    Eric Roberts
    • The Master…
    Daphne Ashbrook
    Daphne Ashbrook
    • Dr. Grace Holloway
    Sylvester McCoy
    Sylvester McCoy
    • The Doctor
    Yee Jee Tso
    Yee Jee Tso
    • Chang Lee
    John Novak
    John Novak
    • Salinger
    Michael David Simms
    Michael David Simms
    • Swift
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    • Wheeler
    • (as Catherine Lough)
    Dolores Drake
    Dolores Drake
    • Curtis
    Will Sasso
    Will Sasso
    • Pete
    • (as William Sasso)
    Jeremy Radick
    Jeremy Radick
    • Gareth
    Eliza Roberts
    Eliza Roberts
    • Miranda
    Bill Croft
    Bill Croft
    • Motorcycle Policeman
    David Hurtubise
    • Professor Wagg
    • (as Dave Hurtubise)
    Joel Wirkkunen
    • Ted
    Dee Jay Jackson
    • Security Guard
    Gordon Tipple
    Gordon Tipple
    • The Old Master
    Mi-Jung Lee
    • News Anchor
    • Regia
      • Geoffrey Sax
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Matthew Jacobs
      • Sydney Newman
      • Donald Wilson
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti137

    6,311K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    7dr_foreman

    never plays the same way twice!

    This is one of the most over-analyzed pieces of television ever produced. "Doctor Who" fans are such a dedicated bunch that they'll buy camcorders and film their own episodes when the show is not in production; it stands to reason that they'd pick apart the only "official" new episode produced for TV in the 1990s, but the chorus of their dissenting voices sometimes really grates on me. Thanks to all the controversy, I still can't honestly say what I think of this movie, even all these years later; every time I see it, I have a different opinion.

    I'm not on board with some of the usual criticisms. I don't care about the romance (it barely features), and I don't really mind that the Doctor is half-human (it's a side issue that doesn't alter the plot, hardly worth complaining about). What I do dislike is the fast-paced, action-oriented nature of the story, which prevents character development (Chang Lee is the chief offender here) and doesn't allow any room for the Doctor to act like a detective (which is his usual schtick).

    Still, good effects, a rockin' music score and some nice arty camera work elevate this far above the average TV production. Perhaps the only thing that really matters is that it's entertaining; why analyze it beyond that? The only real problem here is that the original series is, generally speaking, even more entertaining, but that's one tough act to follow!

    An ex-roommate and good buddy of mine perhaps summed it up best: "That was fun, but could you put on a cheesy one now? They're more interesting." I bet her opinion of it wouldn't change on a second viewing; I, alas, am afflicted with the curse of fandom!
    G.Spider

    Watchable, but hardly Dr Who at its best.

    At last people can stop taking the proverbial out of the special effects in Dr Who! Instead they can take the proverbial out of the limp plot (if you can call it that). Eric Roberts isn't a patch on either of the previous incarnations of the Master. Paul McGann, however, makes an original Doctor and it's a shame a potentially interesting incarnation of the great Time Lord wasn't allowed to develop. There was a lot of complaining about the kissing scene, but I personally didn't see what was wrong with it as long as the Doctor doesn't turn into James Bond or Captain Kirk. Anyway, since the Doctor has a grand-daughter (Susan) then he must have done more than kiss a woman at some point in his life! But I did see what was wrong with the 'half-human' business. Can't people accept somebody who is an alien?

    This film certainly has its moments and shows great potential for a new series, but it's just a shame Fox couldn't get their act together and make that series instead of allowing it to fall back into the clutches of the money-minded BBC where it'll probably never be seen again.

    Not an example of Dr Who at its best by any means, but if you're a fan of the program like me then it's worth watching just to see the Doctor back in action, if only for one adventure.
    6Theo Robertson

    Something Of An Anti-Climax

    It was in January 1996 that I first heard that my all time favourite TV hero was returning to our screens as a joint BBC / American network TVM . Whoever you are reading this review never EVER give up on your hopes and dreams because for DOCTOR WHO fans in the early 1990s not one of us ever believed we`d be seeing our favourite show return , never mind seeing a big budget American production or that this version was gong to have BAFTA award winning actor Paul McGann in the title role . Words fail to describe the anticipation me and every single other Who fan in the cosmos had in waiting till the TVM was broadcast in May . The only comparison I can think of is LOTR diehards waiting to see FELLOWSHIP , THE TWO TOWERS and RETURN OF THE KING . When the day of the broadcast came one Bank holiday Monday I`d almost bitten my fingers off in unbearable anticipation . I`d read every article I could find about the production in telefantasy magaziness , Paul McGann`s Doctor had appeared on the front cover of every British TV guide and the trailers led me to believe the Daleks were going to be heavily featured alongside the Master . So in mid evening the TVM began and for 90 minutes all the world`s problems disappeared . When the end titles rolled I was torn between being totally amazed by the good and bitterly disappointed by the bad .

    The good bits were Geoffry Sax`s direction . Every single cent was up there on screen for the audience to gasp at . This is one Who story that can`t be accused of having crap FX . Sax also does an excellent editing job with intercutting between scenes , and it really was fascinating watching a Who story take place in an American setting . But the best aspect to the production is Eric Roberts camp scene stealing performance as the Master . My own memories of Roger Delgado`s original Master soon faded as Roberts bad-ass TERMINATOR inspired American arch enemy of the Doctor stole the entire show .

    But unfortunately much of the bad outweighed the good and most of this was entirely down to Matthew Jacobs script which involved far too much continuity and extremely bad continiuty at that which not only displeases diehard fans but will alienate casual viewers at the same time . Regeneration ? temporal orbit ? the eye of harmony ? I know of these concepts because I`m a fan but here they`re presented entirely different from what I know them as . Likewise when did the Doctor become half human ? But the most disappointing thing were the Daleks who seem to be intergalatic hangmen and not the Nazis of the universe as shown on TV for three decades . Also bitterly disappointing to see them relegated to an off screen cameo when according to the trailers they might have been making a physical presence . Oh BTW can anyone really understand the plot ? At times it felt more like a Bond movie as the Doctor races around on a motor bike trying to save the world from a super villain . With the exception of Roberts no one really turns in a good performance least of all McGann who is surely one of Britain`s most underrated actors . I really expected more from him , though to be fair he didn`t have a lot to go on due to the script.

    Oh well I suppose it was good while it lasted and I suppose my life has been slightly enriched after seeing an American version of DOCTOR WHO , and let me just repeat if someone had told me in 1992 I`d one day be watching an American version of the show I would have laughed in their face . It`s not the worst DOCTOR WHO story I`ve seen but it`s not a story I`ll watch over and over again unlike The Silurians , Inferno , Genesis Of The Daleks , Seeds Of Doom or Kinda . These really were classic pieces of not only Who but of British television
    7MaxBorg89

    A noble failure

    In 1996, seven years after the original Doctor Who series was canceled, the American network Fox thought a USA reboot of the show might be a good way to bring everybody's favorite Time Lord back to the small screen. The resulting TV movie was notoriously lambasted by critics and fans alike, who responded with more warmth to the BBC's revival of the character in 2005. Perhaps the biggest problem lies in the very fact that the Yanks tried to do their own version of a quintessential British creation: you don't see the Brits try and remake Star Trek, do you? Nevertheless, as messy as it is, this 1996 version of Doctor Who (which is part of the official mythology) has a few valid selling points that make it worth tracking down on a boring Saturday afternoon.

    The original show ended with the Doctor being played by Sylvester McCoy, the seventh incarnation of the character, and it is still McCoy, albeit credited as a guest star, who controls the TARDIS at the beginning of the story. The year is 1999 (as a matter of fact, the specific date is December 31st), and the renegade Time Lord is transporting the ashes of his archenemy, the Master, back to their home planet Gallifrey. However, due to a series of mishaps, the machine crash-lands in America, with the Doctor presumably dead and the Master's spirit free to take over the body of a paramedic (Eric Roberts). His plan is to use some temporal anomaly to steal the Doctor's remaining lives (each Time Lord has thirteen of them; the Master's used them up). As for the Doctor, once he's regenerated into a half-human eighth embodiment (Paul McGann), he has to stop his nemesis once and for all.

    The plot is a classic good vs. evil confrontation, and that's one of the TV movie's main flaws: instead of reintroducing the Doctor, like Russell T. Davies did in the new series, the narrative proceeds as if no time had passed between the original show's finale and this Americanized version. This can prove particularly alienating to US audiences, for whom Doctor Who isn't an essential part of popular culture, and McGann's clumsy voice-over doesn't do much to sort things out in that department. And that's without mentioning the holes in logic: why introduce two new (American) sidekicks, one of whom a potential love interest for the protagonist, and then suggest they would have no major role in other episodes, had the US show been picked up by Fox? And since when do Daleks and Time Lords cooperate, as shown prior to the opening credits?

    That said, McGann and Roberts are good enough to compensate most of the other rubbish, one giving that undeniably English quality to the quirky time traveler, the other adding a bit of OTT menace to one of the show's seminal villains. In addition, the special effects are state-of-the-art, as is the new rendition of Ron Grainer's immortal theme music.

    Overall, a one-off experiment that is best remembered as a guilty pleasure for die-hard fans. Fortunately, the Yanks were wise enough to let the BBC handle everything Who-related from this point on.

    6,5/10
    Daggernow

    Not as big a disaster as some of the reviews say it is.

    This attempted pilot for a new Doctor Who series may have faults but I think some of the criticism is off-base. The original Doctor Who series was never a slave to realism or it's own continuity the way shows like Star Trek or The X-Files were. It was more like a long-running comic strip with it's light "who cares about obsessive fan-boys and fan-girls" approach. This show always played fast and loose with it's own continuity and often contradicted what had gone before for the sake of the present story being aired. So many fans went bananas over things like the Doctor being half-human and the Eye of Harmony being on board the Tardis and the Master being able to slither around in that black snake form to find a new host body or why he was put on trial by the Daleks. For a show that always pretty much made it up as it went along that's a waste of time. I've got some random thoughts to throw out about this attempt to revive the series.

    As for the Doctor being half-human I'll repeat my remark about this show making it up as it went along. From what I recall the show was on the air for years before it even established that he was a Time Lord so a sudden revelation about a half-human heritage isn't as way out as it first seems.

    My view on the Master being able to slither around in snake form is also to repeat that this show was never a slave to it's own continuity. I'd like every Dr Who fan who can't sleep at night fretting over this bit to explain to me what the White Form in the story where Tom Baker regenerated into Peter Davison was and why the other regeneration scenes took place without such a White Form "merging" with the Doctor.

    As for why the Eye of Harmony was on board the Tardis I'll say that if a new Doctor Who series had resulted from this pilot movie they could have done a flashback story at some point featuring Sylvester McCoy's Doctor and explained all that.

    I thought the Master being put on trial by the Daleks was kind of cool - sort of like they were saying "This guy is so evil even the Daleks are outraged!" If a new series had resulted they could have done another Sylvester McCoy flashback story at some point to explain what led up to the Master being put on trial by the Daleks. Maybe he tried to take over Skaro and turn all the Daleks into his own personal hit-squad or some other nonsense.

    Sylvester McCoy was pretty cool for agreeing to appear in this movie to give the potential new Doctor Who series a legitimate link to the original British show. The poor guy had to come in with a lame regeneration scene and went out the same way and the effort was for nothing since the show's own fans turned up their noses at this film and the new series was never given a chance. A new Doctor Who series that didn't live up to the continuity geeks' vision of the show would have been better than no Doctor Who series at all. Just another example of the down-side to cult shows.

    Altri elementi simili

    Doctor Who: The Night of the Doctor
    9,0
    Doctor Who: The Night of the Doctor
    Doctor Who
    6,2
    Doctor Who
    Doctor Who
    8,5
    Doctor Who
    Doctor Who: Time Crash
    8,4
    Doctor Who: Time Crash
    Doctor Who: The Eighth Doctor Adventures
    8,0
    Doctor Who: The Eighth Doctor Adventures
    Torchwood
    7,7
    Torchwood
    An Adventure in Space and Time
    8,2
    An Adventure in Space and Time
    Doctor Who: Tales of the TARDIS
    7,5
    Doctor Who: Tales of the TARDIS
    Dr. Who and the Daleks
    5,6
    Dr. Who and the Daleks
    Doctor Who: Unleashed
    6,3
    Doctor Who: Unleashed
    Class
    6,8
    Class
    K-9 and Company
    6,0
    K-9 and Company

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play The Doctor in Doctor Who (1963) (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.
    • Blooper
      Despite losing all of the possessions that were on his person after being checked into the hospital, The Doctor still produces his trademark bag of jelly babies twice. Where did they come from?
    • Citazioni

      The Doctor: Wait, I remember. I'm with my father, we're lying back in the grass, it's a warm Gallifreyan night...

      Grace: Gallifreyan?

      The Doctor: Gallifrey. Yes, this must be where I live. Now where is that?

      Grace: I've never heard of it. What do you remember?

      The Doctor: A meteor storm. The sky above us was dancing with lights. Purple, green, brilliant yellow. Yes!

      Grace: What?

      The Doctor: These shoes. They fit perfectly!

    • Curiosità sui crediti
      The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play the Doctor in Doctor Who (1963) (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.
    • Versioni alternative
      The version broadcast and released on video by the BBC in 1996 had the following cuts (totalling 1 min 6 secs):
      • The caption "Based on the original series broadcast by the BBC" is removed, although no footage is edited.
      • Chang Lee's gang firing at the departing car.
      • Chang Lee's two friends being shot.
      • The third and fourth gunmen aiming at Chang Lee.
      • The gunmen firing at the TARDIS.
      • The operating scene is heavily edited with many cuts of Grace and her attempts to retrieve the probe from the Doctor's body. The sound of the Doctor's final scream was also removed.
      • A closeup of Chang Lee's neck being twisted and the sound of Bruce's wife's neck snapping. These cuts were waived for the 2001 DVD release.
    • Connessioni
      Edited into Comic Relief: Doctor Who - The Curse of Fatal Death (1999)
    • Colonne sonore
      In A Dream (I Called Out Your Name)
      Written by Barbara L. Jordan and William Peterkin

      Performed by Pat Hodges

      Courtesy of Heavy Hitters Music

      Played on a grammophone when the Doctor is sitting in the lounge of his Tardis, just before the Master escaped

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti2

    • Is this Dr Who movie definitively linked to both the 1963 and 2005 Dr Who series?
    • Is Paul McGann and his role as the 8th Doctor considered Canon?

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 14 maggio 1996 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paesi di origine
      • Stati Uniti
      • Regno Unito
    • Sito ufficiale
      • Official site (United Kingdom)
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Doctor Who: The Movie
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • 1988 Odgen Avenue, Vancouver, Columbia Britannica, Canada(Grace's house)
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Universal Television
      • BBC Worldwide
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 5.000.000 USD (previsto)
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      1 ora 29 minuti
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    Eric Roberts, Paul McGann, Daphne Ashbrook, and Yee Jee Tso in Doctor Who (1996)
    Divario superiore
    By what name was Doctor Who (1996) officially released in Canada in English?
    Rispondi
    • Visualizza altre lacune di informazioni
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.