The Walking Dead

It could have been much better, the movie is actually worth watching once just for the dialog of Eddie Griffin's character and Sgt. Barkley. The problem comes in the form of awkward acting from all the cast (except the aforementioned characters) and the very predictable nature of EVERYTHING you experience during the movie. The film feels rushed and underdeveloped and very average. As the movie moves along you become a bit more attached to the characters due to the flashbacks of life before being deployed to war and good character development but overall this is probably one of the worst war movies I've seen. I give it a 5 just for Eddie though, he is great in this flick.

Okay..... if Platoon or Apocolypse Now is available, you should rent those films instead. However, if you've seen those features (and enjoyed them) -- then give The Walking Dead a shot. Its nothing extraordinary, but each actor (especially Allan Payne) gives a excellent, believable performance. Its also nice to see that Central Florida was used as a location to film something besides a bad comedy (Earnest Saves Christmas) or bad Reality TV shows (Making The Band).

The Walking Dead is a recent Vietnam War movie that focuses on mainly 4 black soldiers and one white soldier in a couple of days of battle. The story has them being dropped off with another platoon to try and rescue some POW's. Soon they realize that it is just the four of them that are still alive. The movie gives you a flashback of each of the characters and why the joined the Army. The movie doesn't get anywhere near as powerful or good as Platoon or The Deer Hunter, but it still holds up as a solid war movie. Joe Morton (Speed, Apt Pupil) and comedian Eddie Griffin (Armageddon, TV's Malcolm and Eddie) give the only two performances of note. Morton gives a good performance as the leader of the group and Griffin surprised me with a strong performance as the loud-mouth with a heart.

I came across this film randomly and ended up enjoying it immensely, much more than I expected to from the jacket cover. This is an unconventional 'Nam flick and the director's risk-taking is palpable and for me it energised the storytelling. The Walking Dead is not an action movie, nor is it a shoot-em-up. It doesn't fetishise gore; the battle scenes serve the plot like a Greek chorus punctuating the real story: tracing the tragi-comedic decisions of the main characters, with a healthy dose of pathos at life's vagaries.

A handful of black soldiers are thrown together after surviving everyone else in the mission, and as the film progresses we're given insight into what led up to their dire situation. It's immersive storytelling, and there's a theatre quality to the scenes - the intimacy of the performances evoked a play-like weightiness for me. Every major character has a backstory that is revealed in monologues and flashbacks, and each soldier provides us with some insight into the consequences of reliance on each other. Another worthy topic explored: why did some folks ship off voluntarily to Vietnam?

The war then provides the backdrop for parable-like tales of how impulsivity, vulnerability, rejection, naivité, self-preservation and hardship can bring us to crossroads. It also explores the relationship between interdependence and survival, and a need/repulsion dyad. How do you relate to people when they're dying unexpectedly all around you? Or betraying you? Or desired by you? All the performances feel fresh, relatable, poignant and unpretentious. Characters have very real mundane lives and methods of escapism. The continual foreshadowing itself becomes a kind of subtext: things might be fine this minute, but things rarely stay fine for long, especially in the face of human frailty. I liked that feeling of gentle gloom, it built suspense for me.

Sure there are some realism quibbles, but this film is far better than a Rambo (and you don't hear people criticizing Rambo for not being realistic!). And ignore the conspiracy-theorist reviews -- there's nothing in this movie comparing casualty numbers between African Americans vs. Caucasians. Four black soldiers are thrown together, and the story begins.

The dialogue is well-crafted, real, and served raw, and there was more than one scene that I found reminiscent of David Mamet or the dark banter of Reservoir Dogs, and maybe even a hint of a battle-fatigued Henry V. There are some hilarious lines in here, and a fantastic stunt scene with a window for the stunt nuts.

The Walking Dead comes across as a stage play, with proper beats between lines at times when actors have realisations or internal turmlil. Backstories are effectively counterposed with the scenes in the present (jungle): 20/20 hindsight and resignation force the soldiers to reflect, retell and relive their past decisions in a kind of homeostasis while they fight to survive and get along. This homeostasis is broken at the end as hindsight and regret are less important than future-building.

I didn't find the plot or ending predictable at all. Although the denouement is a bit trite, it felt satisfying in that parable kind of way. The characters who survive get to have an arc in this denouement, confirming that you can go on, you can survive, you can live down mistakes, and people can change when they're willing to be vulnerable and honest with themselves.

It's 1972 Vietnam. A small group of United States Marines is sent on a mission behind enemy lines to rescue POWs. They come under fire even before their chopper lands and they end up stranded without help. The group is mostly black as each member flashbacks to their lives in America and their origin stories.

Black filmmaker Preston A. Whitmore II is struggling with a lower budget production and it looks like it. It's no better than a TV movie with ambitions. It tries with some action. The subject matter tries to be edgy. That's the best compliment I can give it. Everybody is trying. It's still not good enough.