VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,0/10
2251
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
La vera storia dell'ufficiale del KGB, Ivan Sanchin, che era il proiezionista privato di Stalin dal 1939 fino alla morte del dittatore.La vera storia dell'ufficiale del KGB, Ivan Sanchin, che era il proiezionista privato di Stalin dal 1939 fino alla morte del dittatore.La vera storia dell'ufficiale del KGB, Ivan Sanchin, che era il proiezionista privato di Stalin dal 1939 fino alla morte del dittatore.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 12 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
If, as me, you are interested in the Soviet Union period, its history, art, period atmosphere, Stalin and his whereabouts, if you want to dive into those gloomy years of terror for the common Russian folk, and especially from the inside the Kremlin walls, this TV movie is made for you; It is accurate, splendidly played, made, fascinating material and destined to people in search of the most actual, real events. It's not destined to make gross, to entertain the bulk of today's audiences. I would put it with another TV stuff STALIN, starring Robert Duvall in the lead character. Production design is outstanding here, very meticulously made. You will enjoy it for sure.
There is a human tragedy of global scale - and those humans who sway this tragedy and who just turned out to be grains of sand under those wheels of history. To model what those people were in their good and weak producers and authors of "The Inner Circle" made an awesome cast in this movie - don't you agree that Bob Hoskins playing marshal Berija is worth seeing anyway. Lolita Davidovich's and great Russian actor Oleg Tabakov's was magnificent performance. And at last the central character - Ivan Sanshin - is utterly shrill figure and utterly potent message. Due to genius Tom Hulce who looks and acts completely and very naturally Russian - as I see it being Russian myself. No further words on Tom Hulce - he's just a great actor (though not a "star" in the industry, as I can guess) and every one of his works worth seeing. Even in his small role in "Parenthood" he's very convincing and dramatic - and in "The Inner Circle" he has a great material to work on... An obvious merit of this film - it is historically accurate (with exception of ahead-of-time tanks and probably something else) in details. Accurate Soviet uniforms in a Western movie is really very rare thing and in this film uniform of NKVD-officers looks authentic to the Soviet people like me... And the director's job is not bad at all - Konchalovsky has his peaks and faults and The Inner Circle is one of the peaks, I guess...
After reading the comments of several Russians who have given their special insights on this film, I see no point in my going into detail about its plot. But, for the Americans who were bored with it... well, history is not your thing, to use the vernacular. For me, this movie exposed the odious nature of Soviet totalitarianism, and the complete human conformity that was required for survival. This is an important film.
10pshagar
I decided to review this film because of its emotional impact.
Like "The Killing Fields," it creates tremendous tension in the viewer by portraying sympathetic, likable characters within an environment of tremendous evil.
The acting and cinematography are both excellent, making a direct connection with the feelings of every character.
My only criticism is very slight (I did rate it a 10, after all), but I wondered a bit at the persistance of Sanchin's naivete. While this is central to his character, I found it a little difficult to comprehend based on what he went through.
Like "The Killing Fields," it creates tremendous tension in the viewer by portraying sympathetic, likable characters within an environment of tremendous evil.
The acting and cinematography are both excellent, making a direct connection with the feelings of every character.
My only criticism is very slight (I did rate it a 10, after all), but I wondered a bit at the persistance of Sanchin's naivete. While this is central to his character, I found it a little difficult to comprehend based on what he went through.
This film is a great favorite of mine, though it's a hard-sell to recommend to friends. It's an extremely moving story that brings tears to your eyes, without manipulating you by "pulling the strings." The pathos emerge from the events and the (very well-played) characters depicted. Russian artists seem to have a special affinity for this, and for Konchalovsky this is a very accessible film. Was it tailor-made for Western audiences? The cast would suggest so. Although Tom Hulce was wonderful in "Amadeus," seeing him in "The Inner Circle" impressed me no end. I think it's telling that more than one reviewer of Russian descent on the IMDb found his characterization quintessentially Russian. It's a damn shame we don't see more of his work in films these days. The character of Ivan's wife Anastasia might have helped given rise to some comments that the characters are two-dimensional. As played by Lolita Davidovich, she is all simple, sweet naivety. Somewhat distractingly, for me she evoked memories of Gilda Radner in her appearance and voice. Nevertheless, I enjoyed her performance, and thought it an honest and effective one. All of us should have the opportunity to know someone like Anastasia in our lifetimes. Like many such characters in works of fiction, she proves to be too good to live. The scene at the end of the film, when Ivan sees the teenaged Katya amongst the mob at Stalin's funeral, and runs over the heads and shoulders of the crowd to prevent her from killing herself in the lethal crush -- it's absolutely devastating. How Konchalovsky finds a credible way to set the scene of their cathartic breakdown to each other to the fourth movement of Tchaikovsky's "Pathetique" symphony is really ingenious. I get misty just writing about it. Maybe it's not for everybody, but I can't praise it highly enough.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe movie premiered in the United States on December 25, 1991 - one day before the Soviet Union dissolved and became the Russian Federation.
- BlooperThe movie covers the years 1939 to Stalin's death in 1953. However, it constantly refers to the KGB, an organization that did not come into existence until 1954. Until then the USSR security service was known by a variety of names, most notably the NKVD (Narodny Komisariat Vnutrennykh Del or People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs) between 1934 and 1943. It is this organization that Ivan would have joined in 1939. However, the sign on the NKVD headquarters in the film does read "NKVD" not "KGB". This refers only to foreign versions of movie, because in russian version names are correct. "NKVD" is used in early scenes and "MGB" in '50s.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Inner Circle?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 93.292 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 36.782 USD
- 29 dic 1991
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 93.292 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 17min(137 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti