VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,2/10
2004
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen Miss Marple is invited to the manor house of an old friend, it is not long before a puzzling murder puts her mind to work.When Miss Marple is invited to the manor house of an old friend, it is not long before a puzzling murder puts her mind to work.When Miss Marple is invited to the manor house of an old friend, it is not long before a puzzling murder puts her mind to work.
Recensioni in evidenza
Miss Marple is the best of friends with two aging sisters. One sister, who thinks the other is in danger, has Miss Marple to pay a timely visit. Upon arriving she encounters a host of garden variety misfits and reform school types, along with their keepers, sharing the estate grounds with her friend. All of this makes for a genuinely great plot that includes the murder of the family Patriarch by which Miss Marple further sharpens her already keenly honed crime solving acumen.
This is one of the better TV-Movie adaptations that preserves the plot from novel to the screen. The screenplay flows well, has no obvious holes or gaps, the acting is grade A, and the Directing is Superb. I highly recommend this particular film as one of the BEST Miss Marple TV-Movies ever!!!
This is one of the better TV-Movie adaptations that preserves the plot from novel to the screen. The screenplay flows well, has no obvious holes or gaps, the acting is grade A, and the Directing is Superb. I highly recommend this particular film as one of the BEST Miss Marple TV-Movies ever!!!
This version tries to bring Christie's story accurately, but the editing is so choppy the details of plot are often hard to follow. Not to worry, though, intuitively if not deductively, you'll spot the murderer without much trouble. Good cast, especially Jean Simmons, and great scenery make it a pleasant watch. Joan Hickman, though, as Miss Marple just didn't quite cut it for me.
This was quite a poor dramatisation and illustration. It felt too long and drawn out. When we finally arrive to the murder and how it was executed it was very rushed and they annoyingly did not show how it was done, they just said who did it but not how. In Agatha Christie stories the greatest value is delivered at the end when the how and story comes full circle. The viewers were cheated of this.
Not a good production at all and a waste of time.
Not a good production at all and a waste of time.
Miss Marple answers a call to go the aid of her old friend Carrie Louise, who's life is seemingly under threat.
I truly love Joan Hickson's adaptations of Miss Marple; she is, in my opinion, the quintessential Jane Marple. This one however, is one of my lesser favorites in the series. I'll try to explain why.
The novel itself isn't one of my favorites; I find the trickery of the murder works better in the book (in my mind) than it does on screen. In terms of production, I find it safe but still very good; when compared to other adaptations, it's quite not there.
On the plus side, the acting is superb; Hickson is, as always, excellent, and Holly Aird is wonderfully youthful and vibrant as Gina. The legendary Jean Simmons is incredibly sweet; she gave a sensitive and believable performance of the fragile Carrie Louise. I am a bit biased when it comes to Joss Ackland; he is hugely charismatic, at times almost overpoweringly so, but here we see a restrained, dare I say, touching performance; his voice makes him incredibly watchable.
The scene I enjoyed most of all, I think, was the stage play. Ruth looks on awkwardly, but Marple watches intently. It's there to show that events are sometimes smoke and mirrors, it's very cleverly put together. I also like their later fireside chat where she talks about the robberies committed by starting the bonfires early.
I would still call it a very good adaptation, it's just that I have such high regards for others in the series. I must say I find ITV's later Marple adaptation to be particularly good, a series people often moan about.
8/10.
I truly love Joan Hickson's adaptations of Miss Marple; she is, in my opinion, the quintessential Jane Marple. This one however, is one of my lesser favorites in the series. I'll try to explain why.
The novel itself isn't one of my favorites; I find the trickery of the murder works better in the book (in my mind) than it does on screen. In terms of production, I find it safe but still very good; when compared to other adaptations, it's quite not there.
On the plus side, the acting is superb; Hickson is, as always, excellent, and Holly Aird is wonderfully youthful and vibrant as Gina. The legendary Jean Simmons is incredibly sweet; she gave a sensitive and believable performance of the fragile Carrie Louise. I am a bit biased when it comes to Joss Ackland; he is hugely charismatic, at times almost overpoweringly so, but here we see a restrained, dare I say, touching performance; his voice makes him incredibly watchable.
The scene I enjoyed most of all, I think, was the stage play. Ruth looks on awkwardly, but Marple watches intently. It's there to show that events are sometimes smoke and mirrors, it's very cleverly put together. I also like their later fireside chat where she talks about the robberies committed by starting the bonfires early.
I would still call it a very good adaptation, it's just that I have such high regards for others in the series. I must say I find ITV's later Marple adaptation to be particularly good, a series people often moan about.
8/10.
Despite thinking that I had seen the vast majority of the BBC Marple films, my second random one in as many days turned out to be yet another one I had never seen before. Sleeping Murder had been the first and had been surprising accessible and lively and the opening of Mirrors made me think it would be more of the same, with the American voices and the tone of the opening scenes. I was also familiar with the story as I had seen the ITV Marple films adapt it as well. Sadly They Do It with Mirrors turned out to be a real summary of what I tend to dislike about the Marple series.
Running long (particularly with adverts lasting 4 minutes every 10-15 minutes) the film really takes its time with everything but not in a way that hooks me. Ironically I felt that Sleeping Murder was almost too accessible and easy to follow, but yet at the same time I appreciated it for this. They Do it with Mirrors goes the other direction by quite some measure as it does almost nothing to assist the viewer in keeping up with Marple or indeed even CI Slack. Instead of clues or red-herrings what we are given are characters and details – but none of which really are much used until we enter that final room for the traditional reveal. Like tedg said in his review, the viewer here is never allowed to be taken along with the case – we are sitting in the final room with the rest of them, knowing who people are but learning stuff we didn't know before and couldn't have figured out.
The problem I have with this is that I feel excluded and just expected to wait rather than be involved in the mystery. The longer this goes on the less inclined I was to care and by the end I was really not paying much attention to it. There never appears to be much in the delivery to intrigue the viewer or make them think – I watched this knowing the story but yet still didn't really know where it was going and while I'm open to the idea of me being dumb, I think part of it was that the film wasn't actually going anywhere until it got to the final reveal. I'd like to say the pieces all fell into place at this point, but they don't because we hadn't been given pieces – only characters, no clues, no nuggets etc. The cast are solid throughout despite this; I do like Hickson as Marple and enjoy her way of playing it as all observation and gossip – the downside is that she does live in her head as a character so she needs the script to help her in terms of what the viewer can "see", she gets no such help with this one.
I'm not sure if it is deliberate or by design but this film was incredibly uninvolving – it offered me nothing throughout and then suddenly pulls the solution out of nowhere. It is difficult to care and before the reveal scene I had really stopped being interested since the film itself seemed so uninterested in me.
Running long (particularly with adverts lasting 4 minutes every 10-15 minutes) the film really takes its time with everything but not in a way that hooks me. Ironically I felt that Sleeping Murder was almost too accessible and easy to follow, but yet at the same time I appreciated it for this. They Do it with Mirrors goes the other direction by quite some measure as it does almost nothing to assist the viewer in keeping up with Marple or indeed even CI Slack. Instead of clues or red-herrings what we are given are characters and details – but none of which really are much used until we enter that final room for the traditional reveal. Like tedg said in his review, the viewer here is never allowed to be taken along with the case – we are sitting in the final room with the rest of them, knowing who people are but learning stuff we didn't know before and couldn't have figured out.
The problem I have with this is that I feel excluded and just expected to wait rather than be involved in the mystery. The longer this goes on the less inclined I was to care and by the end I was really not paying much attention to it. There never appears to be much in the delivery to intrigue the viewer or make them think – I watched this knowing the story but yet still didn't really know where it was going and while I'm open to the idea of me being dumb, I think part of it was that the film wasn't actually going anywhere until it got to the final reveal. I'd like to say the pieces all fell into place at this point, but they don't because we hadn't been given pieces – only characters, no clues, no nuggets etc. The cast are solid throughout despite this; I do like Hickson as Marple and enjoy her way of playing it as all observation and gossip – the downside is that she does live in her head as a character so she needs the script to help her in terms of what the viewer can "see", she gets no such help with this one.
I'm not sure if it is deliberate or by design but this film was incredibly uninvolving – it offered me nothing throughout and then suddenly pulls the solution out of nowhere. It is difficult to care and before the reveal scene I had really stopped being interested since the film itself seemed so uninterested in me.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizChristopher Villiers and Jay Villiers, brothers in real life, play brothers in this episode.
- BlooperIn the opening shots of the Savoy Hotel, numerous national flags are shown flying above the entrance. The Canadian Red Maple Leaf flag is clearly visible. Unfortunately, the time setting of the film predates the adoption of the Canadian flag in 1965. This time setting is borne out by a reference by one of the characters as claiming to be the son of a very important and busy man, Winston Churchill. Churchill died in February of 1965 and the Canadian flag was adopted later that same year. So if Churchill was alive and, a busy and important man, the Flag of Canada would have been a red ensign bearing the Canadian Shield not the red Maple Leaf Flag.
- Citazioni
Miss Jane Marple: After all, a weed is just a plant in a place you don't want it to be.
- ConnessioniFollowed by Miss Marple: The Mirror Crack'd from Side to Side (1992)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Giochi di prestigio
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti