Golden Years

As "Fredichi29" has said in his review, the ending is hilariously bad, but almost so bad that it's good, like in an Ed Wood way. Huffman is cool in the second half, but in the first half she seems to be playing an entirely different gal. Weird. Also, they try to sex her up, but it's mostly awkward. Near the end, though, she gets kinda hot, not gonna lie lol.

DVD version: A SciFi movie with a truly original premise and glimpses of real people.

I've not really enjoyed a Stephen King horror movie since Firestarter. Just so you know my bias I like Stephen King horror books but not his horror movies. I do enjoy his non-horror films. Misery, The Shawshank Redemption, Dolores Claiborne, Apt Pupil, The Green Mile, and Dead Zone (both TV show and movie).

Golden Years is on the slow side, as is to some extent every movie I listed above. Golden Years succeeds like the above movies when it explorers characters in ways we are not used to exploring them.

Golden Years is about relationships, about the love and relationship of an elderly couple. Rarely in any movie or book do we see two characters this rich a history and depth of love. The action in Golden Years is not a lab experiment gone wrong, it is about the world of two people suddenly shaken to its foundation as they both come to realize that they have no control over their future. Golden Years is the story about the fear of leaving someone behind and the story of being afraid of being left behind.

The movie works well when the characters are connecting, unfortunatly not all the characters connect well. All in all there is much to be admired here. All in all this is simply a made for TV mini-series of the type often slapped together in the 80s-early 90s.

Both the TV version and Video version are greatly flawed due to rather odd editing choices. The ending of all three versions is still a bit weak, due I suspect to the last two episodes being written by Josef Anderson. The old age makeup for the lead character Harlen Williams leaves a lot to be desired and is often just plain distracting.

I am saddened that Stephen King feels he doesn't have anything to write about any more. Golden Years deserves to have many of its ideas fully realized in a novel.

When this series aired I watched most of it. I think it was supposed to be a long running series in the vein of "The Fugitive" and "The Incredible Hulk" where the protagonist is being chased around the country looking for a solution to his problems. In this case the hero's problem is his progressive aging in reverse. I liked what I saw of these shows. The acting was good especially the sorrowful relationship between the lead character and his wife. Problem is: They cancelled it before it had a chance to end. (either that or I missed the last episodes).

They never got a chance to wrap up the story either, knowing it had been cancelled. Poof it was just gone. However, like I said before I might have missed the last episodes. But my proof to the contrary is this: I rented the tape. Where I left off in the series. The lead character's wife dies in a fire started by a chase involving King's famous organization the Shop. While getting away hero is kidnapped. It ends with his friends realizing they have to go save him from the Shop. The end. Last episode. On the video: His wife does not die but escapes the fire with him. Right when he should get nabbed by the Shop, he and his wife share a weird moment then phase out of existence. Abrupt, silly and cheap to the extreme. They just wanted to put this video out and decided to tag on an ending not caring how bad it was. They might as well of just shown some stock footage of the first atomic bomb detonations. Almost Pythonesque.

The show did have a cool opening title sequence set to the David Bowie song of the same name

I got this as part of a dvd collection back in 2023, a point in time in which no one buys dvds anymore but I am a staunch supporter and avid fan of physical media. I had seen the rest of the collection before but I never had the chance to see this, so I remember watching it and fast forward to 2025, I had no recollection of it.

If only I had stayed that way.

The miniseries is just pointless. You start off with a decent story that melts into convoluted and unexplained hokum that doesn't really make a comment or tell a story. The characters are sympathetic at first but after the first 3 episodes, you lose interest in either their motives or their character arcs, since the actors seem to forget their reasoning for why they are playing that character.

Harlan Williams was commendably played but the makeup and the soft spoken passive aggressiveness felt rather unconvincing. His wife Gina felt genuine but her meddling, obnoxious nagging and her hard headed naiveté wore thin quickly and you lose interest in caring for her. Terry Spann was played by 2 different actresses, apparently, and it loses the sex appeal the character once thrusted into the series. General Crewes is first seen as sternly dull but evolves into comic relief by the third act of this with no actual resolve. The mad scientist Toddhunter was just despicable and utterly insufferable since he showed up onscreen and never lost that charm, but then again, he acted just like you would expect a man to, if he were named "Toddhunter". I don't know why Stephen Root is in this and I don't care to know, considering that he plays a conniving yet pusillanimous military major, both of which aren't really his best impersonations. The only character to actually make this interesting was the project's antagonist by the name of Andrews. He plays a rather convincing figure who is sent to eliminate the potential investigators or whistleblowers that kickstart the story's premise.

Some of these characters hit their mark and some never did. Most notable, the heinous scientist who caused all this trouble, only to be given some shoddy backstory regarding his controlling or overbearing father and then disappearing right before the miniseries' attempt at a climax.

The original run had an ending that was meant to signify the beginning of an actual tv series but failed to garner any viewer investment and was dropped.

Thus, we get a dvd release of it, with an alternate ending that seems to literally vanish into thin air and leave everything without an actual explanation after making us spend 4 fricking hours trying to put it all together. It didn't work back when it came out, didn't work when I first saw it and after trying to rewatch it this time around.

The ultimate irony of it is that I've said more in my review about it than anything the miniseries attempted to say about it in its entire length. I wish I could like this just for the sake of it being the work of Stephen King but it is probably one of his weaker entries and one of his greatest misses. My only hope is that in writing this in 2025, someone who is hard up for remaking worthless drivel, reads this review and leaves this one alone.

We don't ever need a remake or reboot of Stephen King's "Golden Years".

Ever.

What was Stephen King thinking writing this dull, derivative yawnfest? A really un-interesting four hours was made out of the simple story of a man caught in an explosion at a factory who starts to get younger, and the various agents of the government who chase him wanting to know what happened. The whole thing could have fitted into an hour, but no , we have to witness every long winded chase and escape plan, plus endlessly tedious scenes of no relevance concerning a completely over the top mad doctor, and un-funny comedy relief provided by an irritating general dogsbody character. To top it all, the thing doesn't even end-just sort of peters out to nothing-no payoff-zilch. Derivative and not worthy of Stephen King's normal high quality-avoid this like the plague. You'll be bored senseless if you watch it, and at 4 hours it is a criminal waste of time.