VALUTAZIONE IMDb
2,8/10
2417
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA retired occultist turned police officer must battle a former lover as she attempts to summon forth demonic forces after escaping an asylum.A retired occultist turned police officer must battle a former lover as she attempts to summon forth demonic forces after escaping an asylum.A retired occultist turned police officer must battle a former lover as she attempts to summon forth demonic forces after escaping an asylum.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Peter Liapis
- Jonathan Graves
- (as Pete Liapis)
Andrew Craig
- Mugger
- (as Craig Andrew)
Lynn Danielson-Rosenthal
- Female Victim
- (as Lynn Danielson)
Recensioni in evidenza
This movie didn't compare to the earlier Ghoulies, especially the first one.
In fact, it hardly seemed like a Ghoulies movie.
It was a totally different kind of movie, in which the only interesting character was the villainness.
Despite its departure from prior Ghoulies movies, this one could actually have become a slam-dunk cult classic had they given the villainess a more developed role.
The writers had the right set-up for it -- a contrast between her and the helpless guy she was holding in her clutches.
She's hardly a good actress, but think Rocky Horror Picture Show and it's easy to picture what they could have done.
Then it could have become a cult classic.
In fact, it hardly seemed like a Ghoulies movie.
It was a totally different kind of movie, in which the only interesting character was the villainness.
Despite its departure from prior Ghoulies movies, this one could actually have become a slam-dunk cult classic had they given the villainess a more developed role.
The writers had the right set-up for it -- a contrast between her and the helpless guy she was holding in her clutches.
She's hardly a good actress, but think Rocky Horror Picture Show and it's easy to picture what they could have done.
Then it could have become a cult classic.
Terence Malick. Stanley Kubrick. Stephen Speilberg. Great directors all, and yet none have come close to the genius that is Ghoulies IV. The man by the name of Jim Winorski, created this masterpiece that deserves a place alongside the great films of our time. And I thought no movie could be worse than Troll 2. Well let me tell you, Troll 2 is to Ghooulies IV what Gone with the Wind is to Heaven's Gate. There are no actors, only people trying to act. And their attempts are beyond the pathetic. The creature on the box isn't even the same as in the movie!! Absolutely the most amateurish film I've ever seen - I could do better with a videocamera and no script. Ugh. I didn't even find it bad enough to be able to enjoy it for camp (like Ed Wood) - it's JUST BAD. The worst film I've ever seen.
...but it is pretty awful. A beefy (fat) cop is sent to investigate a break in at a warehouse unaware that a leather clad devil worshipper is trying to summon some demon or other using a red diamond, which she has lost due to her own stupidity. The cop has a similar diamond around his neck, for reasons that become brain-damagingly clear later, and is followed by two demon type things that appeared through a pentagram at the start of the film. Sprinkle in some footage from Ghoulies, some bad acting, daft optical effects and some comedy and you've got a film that you'll only watch when completely lost for anything else.
It's bad, this one, but not totally worthless. The cheapness keeps it going and it's directed by the guy who made the great Chopping Mall and the not-bad 967-Evil 2. The leather clad chick eases the pain a lot, as well as the bad acting. Very little blood and gore for a film of this type though.
It's bad, this one, but not totally worthless. The cheapness keeps it going and it's directed by the guy who made the great Chopping Mall and the not-bad 967-Evil 2. The leather clad chick eases the pain a lot, as well as the bad acting. Very little blood and gore for a film of this type though.
Terrible entry in one of the worst horror series of all time deals with cops, a woman in black leather, and some ghoulish drawfs that aren't ghoulies. Attempts for humor, but fails. This also fails to deliever any thrills, chills, or even plot or logic. No redeeming features what-so-ever. There is a good reason why this is in the IMDB bottom 100. Rated R; Violence, Nudity.
Ghoulies IV is not a bad film. I have very few things I dislike about the movie. One of the things is that the atmosphere is not very good. But the plot is very good. Many people hate this film because it doesn't contain any of the orignal gholies. I had no problem with that. Bottom Line: Ghoulies IV is a great movie.
On a scale of 1 to 10 Ghoulies IV gets a 8.
Rated R (for some reason) for very little language and small violence.
Recommended
On a scale of 1 to 10 Ghoulies IV gets a 8.
Rated R (for some reason) for very little language and small violence.
Recommended
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe reason that the Ghoulies were played by actors in costumes as opposed to puppets was because Cinetel Films couldn't afford to use the puppet props of the original Ghoulies.
- Citazioni
Jonathan Graves: Attention K-Mart shoppers.
[fires his gun]
- Versioni alternativeThe 1994 UK video was cut by 9 secs by the BBFC to remove footage of Oriental throwing stars. The cuts were restored in the 2004 Boulevard DVD.
- ConnessioniEdited from 976 chiamata per il diavolo 2 (1991)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 24 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti