VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,4/10
31.924
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
I cani possono parlare in una famiglia di quattro persone, dove la mamma perde il lavoro lo stesso giorno in cui papà trova lavoro come pilota per un capo carino e single.I cani possono parlare in una famiglia di quattro persone, dove la mamma perde il lavoro lo stesso giorno in cui papà trova lavoro come pilota per un capo carino e single.I cani possono parlare in una famiglia di quattro persone, dove la mamma perde il lavoro lo stesso giorno in cui papà trova lavoro come pilota per un capo carino e single.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 4 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
While this is a bad film and the low point of Travolta's career he would bounce back a year later with Pulp Fiction.I watched this film as a kid and is a guilty pleasure.
Well, at least this was the last they made(*no*, Hollywood, that was *not* a dare). In that they had run out of different genders of children to give celebrity voices to, they turned to the pets. This time, they give the family two dogs, one of each gender, give them each a voice and lets the kids rest their inner voices. Why is it that infants, right from the womb(which we, again, see, because there apparently can not be an entry in this franchise without that), have the voice of people who are about middle-aged, give or take a handful of years or so? Apparently, even dogs. Oh well, at least these two actors, DeVito and Keaton, aren't too bad(not that I had a problem with Willis, at least as an actor), and the former's voice fits rather well for a canine. Take that any way you want. At least Roseanne is gone... but they make efforts to make Julie as annoying without her, having her tell knock-knock jokes so lame that even the parents would ask her to stop... she also apparently fantasizes about beating Charles Barkley, who must have liked the part, as he did the same thing again three years later, in Space Jam. Dukakis shows up again, in what can only be loyalty(in a film with dogs as main characters, how fitting). Heckerling neither wrote nor directed this... when the very *creator* of a franchise steps down, you ought to know there's something wrong. There is no trace left of any charm the series ever had(which was all found in the first). I would say that the franchise by this point just has overstayed its welcome, but it could be argued that it achieved that before the end credits of the original film. More nightmare sequences, this time being ridiculous(a first for the series; usually, they were just misplaced and more unsettling than anything a young child should watch). The main conflict is essentially rehashed from the first two, only dumbed down. Lysette Anthony shows up, her acting performance being at the same level that it was in Trilogy of Terror II(that would be poor). This film will insult the intelligence of anyone beyond the age of seven, but some of the humor remains above what they will(or should) understand, or ought to watch. The very ending was almost too much. I recommend this to people who like dogs, and men attracted to Lysette. 3/10
Look Who's Talking Now is not absolutely unwatchable and certainly not the worst movie ever made, but for me it is weakest of the series. I really enjoyed the first, and while watchable the second was a disappointment. Look Who's Talking Now has its good points, such as the soundtrack and the two dogs voiced wonderfully by Danny DeVito and Diane Keaton. Plus it is not too bad visually.
However, the concept has been done to death but the story feels very tired this time around, and to further disadvantage there are one too many thin and predictable gags and weak lines in the script. Other than DeVito and Keaton the other acting wasn't so impressive, this time John Travolta and Kirstie Alley seem to be phoning in their performances as the bickering couple. And the ending was far too sentimental for my liking.
Overall, perhaps worth the look but it is disappointing for me anyway. 3/10 Bethany Cox
However, the concept has been done to death but the story feels very tired this time around, and to further disadvantage there are one too many thin and predictable gags and weak lines in the script. Other than DeVito and Keaton the other acting wasn't so impressive, this time John Travolta and Kirstie Alley seem to be phoning in their performances as the bickering couple. And the ending was far too sentimental for my liking.
Overall, perhaps worth the look but it is disappointing for me anyway. 3/10 Bethany Cox
At least the second film in this god-awful trilogy had the benefit of being so bad and inappropriate it was unintentionally hilarious. This scattershot, occasionally offensive, always unsettling and very dumb film is one of the most boring cinematic experiences in recent memory. The side plot of dogs, (how'd they score DeVito and Keaton, both of whom were doing much better that Alley or Travolta at this point in their carreers?), is useless; the 'dad is hard at work' subplot is just recycled from the second film, (they even use the same dream gag), and the plot doesn't really exist. And why does everyone keep ragging on Travolta's carreer? Being a pilot is no easy feat!
Travolta and Alley, who seem to get along in real life, seem to repel each other onscreen; maybe because they're platonically inclined to each other in reality; onscreen they're like two positively charged magnets pushing each other apart. On top of all that, the casual misogyny throughout is grating and extremely distasteful. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Travolta and Alley, who seem to get along in real life, seem to repel each other onscreen; maybe because they're platonically inclined to each other in reality; onscreen they're like two positively charged magnets pushing each other apart. On top of all that, the casual misogyny throughout is grating and extremely distasteful. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Third movie in the series, kids talk on there own now, now it the dogs turn to talk.
I grew up talking dogs, So I never really Grown out of these kinda of movies.
I love them, I also really enjoyed this movie,
This movie was very funny for both parents and kids, there are really great jokes that really work.
However this movie as some Xmas moments but never really felt like Xmas movie. all the way thought.
Decent Family movie, I love dogs, you will enjoy this more.
6 out of 10
I grew up talking dogs, So I never really Grown out of these kinda of movies.
I love them, I also really enjoyed this movie,
This movie was very funny for both parents and kids, there are really great jokes that really work.
However this movie as some Xmas moments but never really felt like Xmas movie. all the way thought.
Decent Family movie, I love dogs, you will enjoy this more.
6 out of 10
Lo sapevi?
- QuizTabitha Lupien did her own basketball moves.
- BlooperAt the beginning of the movie when the parents are putting the children to bed, the window at the end of the hallway shows that it is still daytime.
- Citazioni
[Daphne and Rocks are starting at each other]
Julie Ubriacco: Look! They like each other!
James: [to Mollie] See honey, they like each other.
Daphne: Mongrel.
Rocks: Bitch.
- Versioni alternativeThe music video "It's Christmas, C'est Noel" starring by Jordy Lemoine and the movie main stars during the end credits, was deleted on DVD editions, being replaced for a classic end credits roll with "Sleigh Ride" as musical score.
- Colonne sonoreHound Dog
Written by Jerry Leiber & Mike Stoller
Performed by Elvis Presley
Courtesy of The RCA Records Label of BMG Music
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Look Who's Talking Now?Powered by Alexa
- What is "Look Who's Talking Too" about?
- Is "Look Who's Talking Too" based on a book?
- How old are Mikey and Julie in this movie?
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 22.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 10.340.263 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 4.022.570 USD
- 7 nov 1993
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 10.340.263 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 36 minuti
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Senti chi parla adesso! (1993) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi