[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
IMDbPro

Experiment - Due destini in gioco

Titolo originale: Duplicates
  • Film per la TV
  • 1992
  • PG-13
  • 1h 27min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,3/10
230
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Experiment - Due destini in gioco (1992)
DrammaFantascienzaMisteroThriller

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA woman runs into a man who looks exactly like her dead brother. He claims he doesn't know her and leaves. She and her husband decide to investigate. This leads them to the Sandburg Research... Leggi tuttoA woman runs into a man who looks exactly like her dead brother. He claims he doesn't know her and leaves. She and her husband decide to investigate. This leads them to the Sandburg Research Institute.A woman runs into a man who looks exactly like her dead brother. He claims he doesn't know her and leaves. She and her husband decide to investigate. This leads them to the Sandburg Research Institute.

  • Regia
    • Sandor Stern
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Sandor Stern
    • Andrew Neiderman
  • Star
    • Gregory Harrison
    • Kim Greist
    • Cicely Tyson
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    5,3/10
    230
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Sandor Stern
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Sandor Stern
      • Andrew Neiderman
    • Star
      • Gregory Harrison
      • Kim Greist
      • Cicely Tyson
    • 10Recensioni degli utenti
    • 4Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Foto10

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 4
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali27

    Modifica
    Gregory Harrison
    Gregory Harrison
    • Bob Boxletter
    Kim Greist
    Kim Greist
    • Marion Boxletter
    Cicely Tyson
    Cicely Tyson
    • Dr. Randolph
    Lane Smith
    Lane Smith
    • Mr. Fryman
    William Lucking
    William Lucking
    Scott Hoxby
    Scott Hoxby
    Kevin McCarthy
    Kevin McCarthy
    • Dr. Congemi
    John DeLay
    • Dr. Stanley
    • (as John Delay)
    Matt Williams
    Matt Williams
    • Tom
    Beth Harper
    • Clarissa
    Don Hibdon
    • Clerk
    Don Adler
    • Officer Michaels
    Timi Prulhiere
    Timi Prulhiere
    • Valerie
    Erik Alskog
    • Joey
    Russ Fast
    • Kurt
    Shawna Schuh
    • Penny
    Barbara Kite
    • Dorothy
    Jim Hechim
    • Jeff
    • Regia
      • Sandor Stern
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Sandor Stern
      • Andrew Neiderman
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti10

    5,3230
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    5Vomitron_G

    Mind swappers

    In addition to fellow-commentator Petershelleyau on here, who came up with an amusing summary line, I'd like to point out that it's not exactly people's brains that get replaced in this movie, but their minds rather. DUPLICATES is a very watchable, but nonetheless pretty forgettable early 90's thriller with a sci-fi touch. There's not much action or thrills in this one, but the dramatic story-line hums along at a decent pace. Given the premise of DUPLICATES, it sounds like an intriguing film, but the mystery that should be present throughout a movie like this, isn't really there. You just know what's going on very early in the movie already, and the viewer is always one step ahead of the main characters. The movie does have that typical 'made-for-TV' look and feel, but it's well-made altogether. The leading couple, played by Gregory Harrison and Kim Greist, give fair enough performances in their rolls as Bob and Marion Boxletter, the married couple that gets erased. Good thing about DUPLICATES is that it wastes no time getting the story going. Marion seems to recognize her brother (in the first scene - not counting the opening teaser-scene, featuring a villainous Lane Smith), who had been lost and presumed dead for over a year (together with their 10 year old son). Her brother doesn't recognize her and claims he's someone else. They go on a investigating spree, and soon it's them who find their minds replaced by the ones of two previously deceased strangers.

    Naturally, this makes up for a mildly entertaining 90 minutes, but I just would have loved a little more excitement and a more complicated plot (with a tagline like "They steal your family. They steal your mind. They steal you!", one might even falsely assume it's some kind of of predecessor to Schwarzenegger's ERASER or something). It's just all a bit uneventful and too predictable. The 'loss of identity' aspect I liked, but the whole 'love is in the heart and not in the mind'-angle, I could have done without. For a movie that shows similarities to films like THE STEPFORD WIVES and the more recent Koontz' adaptation BLACK RIVER (both superior films in my book), the plot of DUPLICATES could have used a bit more larger scaled conspiracy aspects to make it a bit more complex. But now, it's just about the couple in search for their identity and the truth to the matter. A satisfying, but predictable conclusion wraps it up nicely and makes this movie not much more than a passable time-waster when it comes on TV. It was fun seeing Lane Smith again (known for his memorable role as Nathan Bates in "V" - the series). And given his role in DUPLICATES (as Mr. Fryman, the ill-natured head of the whole science-project) he really feels to me like the 80's equivalent of William B. Davis (who's known for portraying Cigarette Smoking Man in "THE X-FILES"). I've always looked at him like that, for some reason.

    Considering the fact that writer/director Sandor Stern was also responsible for the lame THE EVIL ESCAPES-entry in the AMITYVILLE series, DUPLICATES could have been a lot worse. All in all, not bad, but there's more entertaining movies about messing with people's minds out there. I personally had more fun with things like MINDFIELD (1989, starring Michael Ironside) and the total mess that was MINDSTORM (2001, starring both Michael Ironside and William B. Davis). Inferior movies, maybe, but still a bit more fun to watch.
    3Streetwolf

    Too predictable.

    So when Bob and Marion Boxletter see a guy at a hotel, Marion believes it is her long lost brother Brian, but when she approaches him he appears to be someone else just with the exact same face. Marion manages to get his fingerprints and takes it to the police and when the identity is confirmed that it was in fact her brother Brian she and Bob leave for New York after tracing his whereabouts. They get a hold of Brian, but still he doesn't know what they are talking about, but all the couple really want to know is where Brian has their 8 maybe 9 year old son Joey... and even when they see Joey he doesn't know them either. The plot thickens and they find themselves one day thinking that they are someone else as well. Experiments made out on people only to make the perfect assassins yet the question of why they would bother putting Bob and Marion in the same building as each other is beyond me. Personally Gregory Harrison played his 2 parts great, but I have no clue what was wrong with the other actors, they seemed bored and lost. 3 out of 10, a little suspense yes but that's it.
    6zelda1964

    A great Science mystery thrill

    This film runs along the lines of A.I., and scientific experiments on Family and emotion. Greg Harrison and Beth Harper are involved in a devious plot to wipe away memory from all Human existence.Cicely Tyson and Kevin McCarthy are authority figures who try to use them as experimental "guinea Pigs" for research.The most interesting scene is when they return to a restaurant.Harrison is now suspicious of what goes on, when a waitress remembers them from a previous encounter.He tries to steal the disks and set their lives back in order. This movie shows that a person is not a machine; Man is more than skin, and "feeling" and "love" go way deeper.
    petershelleyau

    brain swappers

    Co-writer/director Sandor Stern's sci-fi thriller has a great Michael Crichton-ish/Body Snatchers idea that is underdeveloped. Gregory Harrison and Kim Greist are parents of a missing boy who stumble across the Sandburg Research Institute where doctors Kevin McCarthy and Cicely Tyson are experimenting with memory transfer. The Institute's objective is to remove the criminal mind and replace it with a less-alienated healthier one, and McCarthy and Tyson have been using the bodies of derelicts and replacing their memories with those dying in hospitals. This doesn't explain how the missing boy has ended up in the Institute's community of new-memoried zombie-bodies, but McCarthy's bad haircut and the standover tactics of Lane Smith as the head of the Institute with undefined government connections and an assassin agenda, clues us into the forces that may stop McCarthy and Tyson from getting the Noble Peace prize. Since the parents provide a perceived threat to the Institute, both Harrison and Greist get the memory makeover, but since they are stupidly accomodated within close proximity to each other, we get a demonstration that the emotion of love does not depend upon the existence of memory, and they are soon at it again. What is attractive about the initial situation is the messy emotions displayed by Greist, and Stern's sense to focus the attention onto her and away from Harrison, who is the weaker actor and who's husband is reduced to a blubbering disbeliever. However after the couple's makeover, Stern errs in reducing Greist's role to that of the passive observor to Harrison's investigator, and by refocusing events on Harrison, Stern undermines his narrative. It's not just that Harrison doesn't possess enough natural charisma to carry a lead role, it's also that the made-over characters are essentially less interesting as people. A better actor than Harrison may have suggested the paranoia inherent in the material, and Stern falls back on Harrison's large forehead to represent his profession as a computer nerd, and also one who has been lobotimized. Perhaps because she realises how silly her role is, Tyson whispers her lines, and the scene where the couple are kidnapped in order to be made-over is handled badly by Stern - as if they offer no resistance to anyone that sticks syringes into their arms.
    7j_eyon

    Kim Greist glows

    it's Kim Greist that i keep coming back to this film - she perfectly captures the distraught mother - then a woman in the glow of new love when she meets a man that she doesn't know is her husband

    and that should tell you what type of scifi this is - its one which focuses on the human drama - it shifts the mystery that begins the story - and scifi elements that cap it off - into the background - at least - for a time

    the scifi plot devices - when they are revealed - are pretty silly - they're merely functional in that they provide the motive - and can be tolerated if you think of in that way

    formulaic - simplistic - but with Kim Greist to give it some authenticity - and heart

    Altri elementi simili

    Chi c'è in fondo a quella scala...
    6,5
    Chi c'è in fondo a quella scala...
    Aura
    Aura
    Payoff
    5,0
    Payoff
    Roswell
    6,3
    Roswell
    Throw Momma from the Train: Deleted Scenes
    6,4
    Throw Momma from the Train: Deleted Scenes
    Rain
    5,6
    Rain
    Oltre il destino
    5,8
    Oltre il destino
    Split Images
    5,1
    Split Images
    Perché proprio a me?
    5,7
    Perché proprio a me?
    Il nemico in casa
    4,9
    Il nemico in casa
    Il silenzio spezzato
    6,8
    Il silenzio spezzato
    Razorback: oltre l'urlo del demonio
    6,0
    Razorback: oltre l'urlo del demonio

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Connessioni
      Referenced in WWE Monday Night RAW: Only The Strong Survive (1993)

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 18 marzo 1992 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paese di origine
      • Stati Uniti
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Un'altra vita
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Metropolitan area, Portland, Oregon, Stati Uniti
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Paramount Television
      • Sankan Productions
      • Wilshire Court Productions
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 27min(87 min)
    • Colore
      • Color

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.