She Must Be Seeing Things

1987
1h 35min

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Sheila Dabney and Lois Weaver in She Must Be Seeing Things (1987)

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaJo and Agatha are lovers. Both have careers: the Brasilian-born Agatha is an attorney; Jo is a filmmaker, working hard to complete the shooting of a movie called, "Catalina." Agatha may be s... Leggi tuttoJo and Agatha are lovers. Both have careers: the Brasilian-born Agatha is an attorney; Jo is a filmmaker, working hard to complete the shooting of a movie called, "Catalina." Agatha may be seeing things: she's jealous, convinced Jo is having an affair with a man and follows her. ... Leggi tuttoJo and Agatha are lovers. Both have careers: the Brasilian-born Agatha is an attorney; Jo is a filmmaker, working hard to complete the shooting of a movie called, "Catalina." Agatha may be seeing things: she's jealous, convinced Jo is having an affair with a man and follows her. But is it Jo she's following, or someone who looks like her? Jo is either too exhausted to... Leggi tutto

Regia
- Sheila McLaughlin
Star

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

5,8/10

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Regia
- Sheila McLaughlin
Star

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

Foto

Recensioni degli utenti3

5,884

Recensioni in evidenza

9KaliKali

Well worth the time

I wasn't too sure what to make of this movie - I kept seeing the box in the video store, I had the soundtrack that John Zorn composed, but had never gotten around to seeing it until recently. Whilst some of the acting is a little heavy-handed, the story kept me going even though I basically knew nothing about the movie in advance.

2defghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

I Must Be Seeing Things (re: the 7/10 rating this film has)

This is one of the worst films I've ever seen. Apart from the immensely irritating soundtrack and god-awful acting, there's also the completely retarded scenes in which Agatha reads Jo's diary aloud (I'm not sure which of these is stupider; the one where she spins on her chair non-stop so the director has an 'interesting' shot or the one where as soon as all her colleagues have left a meeting she starts reading aloud in the boardroom) and pretty much nothing to recommend this film whatsoever.

There's also the ridiculous casting of butch ladies in a ridiculous amount of the secondary roles; how many old-school pawn shops do you know that are run by muscular blondes with spikey hair?

Seriously, this sucks worse than any other film I can think of. It seems to exist solely to give queer theorists something to talk about.

1rcthornton-09722

Reviewers Must Have Been Seeing Things

There was nothing erotic or provocative about this movie. It felt more like a dissertation on how jealousy is created. Save yourself the pain of watching or even listening to this movie.