Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA woman is pursued by her murderous, psychopathic twin sister in the days leading up to their birthday.A woman is pursued by her murderous, psychopathic twin sister in the days leading up to their birthday.A woman is pursued by her murderous, psychopathic twin sister in the days leading up to their birthday.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Julia Sullivan
- (as Trish Everly)
- Helen
- (as Morgan Hart)
Recensioni in evidenza
Trish Everly stars as Julia, a teacher in a school for deaf children whose birthday is nearing. In the days leading up to it, her deformed, demented twin sister Mary (Allison Biggers) escapes from the hospital. It seems that Mary had dominated and terrorized the meek Julia during their childhood, and now Julia is more than a little concerned. Mary had had a spooky canine companion when the two women were young, and now there's a bloodthirsty dog adding to the weirdness.
For around an hour or so, this is just a little too dull, although Assonitis succeeds in building some atmosphere. But the story becomes more fun upon its one true big reveal. Eventually, this bears some strong resemblances to the Canadian slasher "Happy Birthday to Me", although it's hard to say whether one movie ripped off the other or not. The beautiful Everly does an okay job in the lead, the equally lovely Morgan Most is fine as her friend, and Michael MacRae is acceptable as Julias' psychiatrist / lover, but the person who steals the show is Dennis Robertson as the friendly Father James. The animal work is good; trainer Joe Camp plays the ill-fated hospital guard. However, during the finale, when the crazed dog comes through a door, a special effect is employed, and it's laughably horrible.
Overall, a decent shocker redeemed to a degree by its last act.
Five out of 10.
Note: Some reviewers have condemned this film for lifting a scene out of HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME, but the the fact of the matter is that both films were released in the same year (1981), so it's debatable as to who stole what from whom. Personally, I preferred the scene as it was staged in this film, regardless of which came first. See it for yourself and you be the judge.
In the United Kingdom in the 1980s, movies released on home video became the target of a hate campaign led by Britain's über-vigilant defenders of moral decency: the press, bored housewives, and Conservative politicians. As a result, a list was compiled of the films they deemed to be most offensive; these titles became known as 'Video Nasties' and were seized from shops before they had a chance to work their evil influence on an unsuspecting public.
Ovidio G. Assonitis's Madhouse was one such 'nasty'.
Featuring a bloodthirsty rottweiler, a frenzied axe attack that reduces the victim's back to a bloody pulp, and a messy canine lobotomy by electric drill, it quickly found itself added to the list of titles most likely to corrupt and deprave. It didn't matter much to the moral crusaders that the film was also a well-crafted psychological chiller that delivered plenty of atmosphere, memorable performances, and some lovely cinematography; no... this film featured a dog receiving a drill-bit between the eyes, and we can't have people watching that kind of stuff, can we?
Two decades on, and Madhouse is now available uncut on DVD; it seems that the people of the UK have since developed to a stage where they are able to handle such horror without it turning them into murderous lunatics (either that, or the authorities have actually realised they were wrong and the film was never that disturbing in the first place). Oh well, better late than never, I suppose...
Ironically, Assonitis's film is perhaps a little too slow and lacking in gore for today's casual horror viewer, but for seasoned fans of the genre, it offers plenty to enjoy: there's the mystery of the identity of a second killer (not too hard to guess, but fun nevertheless); a great OTT performance from Dennis Robertson as Father James, Trish's nursery-rhyme singing uncle; a likable heroine; a brief performance from Morgan Hart as very tasty, blonde rottweiler fodder, Helen; and a ghoulish final scene that is remarkably similar to that of a Canadian slasher, Happy Birthday To Me (who stole from whom is debatable, since both films were released in the same year).
One other complaint is that there are some (movie) deaths of animals on screen which not everyone might tolerate, even if it isn't real. Other than that, can't complain about much else. The acting was actually quite good. For the most part the film is well executed and makes a fine contribution to the roll of 80s slasher films. I do think this is one of the better ones, and would definitely recommend you see it if this is the kind of film you seek out.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe entire crew had to be still and quiet during the shooting of any scenes involving the Rottweiler dogs.
- BlooperKiller stabs a woman with a knife, but only the tip of the knife is covered in blood.
- Citazioni
Mary Sullivan: [Mary grabs Julia's wrist] Kind of makes you sick doesn't it.
Julia Sullivan: Mary...
Mary Sullivan: It doesn't feel so good either, i know, i know? How would you know, you don't have it. Not you. Not little miss prim and propper.
Julia Sullivan: Mary please.
Mary Sullivan: Soon... Soon it will be our birthday again, remember? Remember how we used to celebrate sister dear.
Julia Sullivan: No.
Mary Sullivan: Remember how you'd hide from me, but i'd find you anyway. Remember... Remember what i'd do, how it hurt. HUH,
[Screaming]
Mary Sullivan: well i will make it hurt again. I'll make you suffer like i suffered years of...
[Julia runs away]
Mary Sullivan: Run, but you'll never get away from me. Run! Run!
- Versioni alternativeThe 2004 UK Film 2000 release is fully uncut, although the sound quality is very poor.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Video Nasties: Moral Panic, Censorship & Videotape (2010)
I più visti
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1