[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Gioco mortale

Titolo originale: The Manhattan Project
  • 1986
  • T
  • 1h 57min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,1/10
7304
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Gioco mortale (1986)
Guarda Official Trailer
Riproduci trailer2:13
1 video
24 foto
Commedia darkFantascienzaThriller

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA high school prodigy builds an atomic bomb with stolen plutonium to win the 45th National Science Fair and expose a nuclear weapons lab posing as a nuclear medical research facility in Itha... Leggi tuttoA high school prodigy builds an atomic bomb with stolen plutonium to win the 45th National Science Fair and expose a nuclear weapons lab posing as a nuclear medical research facility in Ithaca, NY.A high school prodigy builds an atomic bomb with stolen plutonium to win the 45th National Science Fair and expose a nuclear weapons lab posing as a nuclear medical research facility in Ithaca, NY.

  • Regia
    • Marshall Brickman
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Marshall Brickman
    • Thomas Baum
  • Star
    • John Lithgow
    • Christopher Collet
    • Richard Council
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    6,1/10
    7304
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Marshall Brickman
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Marshall Brickman
      • Thomas Baum
    • Star
      • John Lithgow
      • Christopher Collet
      • Richard Council
    • 69Recensioni degli utenti
    • 31Recensioni della critica
    • 61Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 1 vittoria e 2 candidature totali

    Video1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:13
    Official Trailer

    Foto24

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 17
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali67

    Modifica
    John Lithgow
    John Lithgow
    • John Mathewson
    Christopher Collet
    Christopher Collet
    • Paul Stephens
    Richard Council
    Richard Council
    • Government Aide
    Robert Schenkkan
    Robert Schenkkan
    • Government Aide
    Paul Austin
    • General
    Adrian Sparks
    Adrian Sparks
    • Scientist
    Curt Dempster
    • Scientist
    Bran Ferren
    Bran Ferren
    • Lab Assistant
    Jill Eikenberry
    Jill Eikenberry
    • Elizabeth Stephens
    Cynthia Nixon
    Cynthia Nixon
    • Jenny Anderman
    Gregg Edelman
    Gregg Edelman
    • Science Teacher
    Abraham Unger
    • Roland
    • (as Abe Unger)
    Robert Sean Leonard
    Robert Sean Leonard
    • Max
    • (as Robert Leonard)
    David Quinn
    • Tennis
    Geoffrey Nauffts
    Geoffrey Nauffts
    • Craig
    Katherine Hiler
    • Emma
    Trey Cummins
    • Terry
    Steve Borton
    • Local FBI
    • Regia
      • Marshall Brickman
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Marshall Brickman
      • Thomas Baum
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti69

    6,17.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    6Mr-Fusion

    No subtlety to be found here, but it's not bad

    "The Manhattan Project" is a fairly entertaining movie, so long as you keep it out from under a microscope. Still, those holes are inescapable. Like how did Paul get the resources to fashion a nuclear lab? More than that, how would a high-schooler know how to handle radioactive materials? Can' really sweep that under the "he's a bright kid" rug; we're talking about resources (or maybe it's completely plausible; hell, I'm not a whiz kid). And didn't any Medatomics personnel notice that four-week-old hole in the wall? Putting that all aside, I kinda like this movie. Mostly because I'm a Lithgow fan, and the big bomb defusal scene packs some suspense. But also for superficial reasons, like Cynthia Nixon's house. And the locations, there's some pretty scenery here.

    6/10
    rmax304823

    Hubris

    There are some things man was never meant to know. Or at least high school kids. The story is interesting in its concept: smart kid builds nuclear device and is barely saved from blowing everyone to smithereens. (Vide: "War Games".) Its execution however makes one squirm with discomfort rather than suspense. First, the acting isn't bad. John Lithgow is especially effective in his scenes with Jill Eikenberry -- a genuinely nice guy just trying to get along. The rest of the performances are adequate. But the character played by Christopher Collett is truly abrasive.

    His scientific intellect is honed to a razor edge, as we find out near the beginning when he arranges a small explosion in the lab drawer of a fellow student who is his rival in science class. Hilarious. His smugness is almost unbearable. And science is about all he's good at. He realizes that Lithgow is "hitting on my mom" (innocently enough) and resents him for it. He doesn't seem to know what an Oedipus complex is. He hasn't heard of Woodward and Bernstein. He asks, "Who's Anne Frank?", and isn't being rhetorical.

    Worst of all, he doesn't really care about his non-scientific ignorance. He's only a few steps removed from the maniac in "Pi." The plot is simply unbelievable. He may be extremely clever but unless he has some sort of PSI power as well, he could not disarm the alarm system in two shakes of a lamb's tail -- let alone unfailingly operate the complex robotic systems in the laboratory. And without so much as a previous glance at it, he knows that the inner wall of the lab can be cut with a pen knife, and he knows just where to cut it too. He may be superhuman as well.

    Radioactive plutonium is still radioactive, even without having reached critical mass, isn't it? And although rubber gloves may stop larger particles like protons, they don't provide much protection against gamma rays, do they? I may be wrong, but at least I'm willing to admit my ignorance, which is more than this egocentric showoff is able to do.

    The first time I saw this movie it was fascinating, especially the first half, not the last part, which deteriorates into a familiar pattern. But I saw it again recently and found it more irritating than anything else, because of Collett's character and because the plot was so full of holes. At least I HOPE it was full of holes. If it were so easy to throw together a nuclear weapon occupying a space the size of a trombone case, and to do so in only a few weeks, I'd hate to think of what might happen if some religious fundamentalist antimodernization Ludditic cryptolunatic saw the movie and it gave him ideas.

    The ending is a heart-warming development in which Lithgow, decides the fight the military and declares, "No more secrets", and throw open the gates to the college kids cheering outside. Right.
    6yddsp@aol.com

    Entertaining enough....BUT....

    This film is entertaining enough, in fact it is quite exciting. However, in a real-life scenario, the end result would not and could not have had such a clichéd "Hollywood ending", so in that respect it sort of resembles a "fractured fairytale". The storyline is credible enough with a bit of imagination stretching, the acting is tolerable, only the irony is laid on a bit too thick. I found the attitude of the principal character to be much too cynical, unrealistic and extremely condescending, even for the likes of some precocious, science-savvy prodigy. Getting back to the entertainment value, the plot progresses expectedly only it thickens toward the direction of the surrealistic, though the basic concept is actually pretty frightening. However, the movie is watchable with its impressive cast; a young Cynthia Nixon, John Lithgow, Chris Collet et al. I have mixed feelings about this film, I did enjoy watching it, but when I began to rationalize it began to appear quite nonsensical. So, if you intend on watching it, simply keep your powers of logic and common sense subdued and it will remain an enjoyable experience.
    8whatch-17931

    Completely ridiculous, but entertaining and even touching

    It's pretty good, well paced, with competent to even great acting.

    But the script is so ridiculous. Despite high production values, the plot is like that of a kid's cartoon.

    This film, uh, bombed badly, and I think I know why. A film with lead characters that are scientists/engineers/wunderkind is likely to appeal to that type of audience. And that's the exact audience that's not going to buy the implausibilities all over this film.

    The worst to me is when he breaks into the lab. He visited the lab once and yet on a whim he is able to completely defeat the lab's security in a VERY elaborate operation.

    However, it's still pretty charming. It doesn't take itself too seriously, it takes itself so EARNESTLY. It's kind of like Point Break in that respect- it takes a completely ridiculous high concept and treats it so respectfully, it comes out charming. It also manages to feel quite a lot like Wargames, as if it were set in the same universe, but without feeling at all like a ripoff. Basically, it feels like a well made sequel that manages to recapture most of the magic of the original., something very rare with actual sequels.

    I was around back in the day, and I do recall this being advertised kind of as a comedy. I'm pretty sure the "does anyone have a Phillips screwdriver" gag being in a trailer. Apparently it was one of those pictures that the studio either didn't understand how to market, or decided to market it as something it wasn't.

    There are some solid gags that fit in organically, like the screwdriver, uh, bit, but the, but it's certainly not remotely a comedy.

    As a reviewer noted, Paul is a genius, yet is frequently stupid about things and not in consistent ways. This is annoying but I suspect that was done because if he were truly aware of these things, he would be quite evil. He's already pretty much a sociopath.
    8wendelsitka-1

    Let It Be

    There are way too many over-analytical reviews ripping this movie to shreds! Folks, this is neither a documentary nor a nuclear physicist's guide to building a real atomic bomb- the whole idea is to entertain and maybe leave you wondering and thinking...what if? It's a story!

    Looks like people actually do watch movies with pen and paper, rack up every possible reality defect, and review each one of them here. Doesn't sound entertaining to me. What they are lacking is an imagination. The movie does draw you in fully and take your mind for a good ride. That's what we pay for! Relax and enjoy, suspend your serious reality for an hour or two! It's a decent movie!

    Altri elementi simili

    Soul Man
    5,3
    Soul Man
    Firstborn
    6,2
    Firstborn
    Fuga dal futuro - Danger Zone
    6,2
    Fuga dal futuro - Danger Zone
    Ritorno alla quarta dimensione
    5,9
    Ritorno alla quarta dimensione
    The Manhattan Project
    The Manhattan Project
    How to Beat the High Cost of Living
    6,0
    How to Beat the High Cost of Living
    L'ora della rivincita
    7,1
    L'ora della rivincita
    The Time Travelers
    5,2
    The Time Travelers
    The Manhattan Project
    6,2
    The Manhattan Project
    Sul sentiero dei mostri
    5,7
    Sul sentiero dei mostri
    Seduttore a domicilio
    6,1
    Seduttore a domicilio
    Il film pirata
    5,4
    Il film pirata

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      The kids with science projects in the background of the science fair scenes were actual NYC middle school students with real science projects that were submitted to the NYC borough-wide science fair. These scenes were filmed over a three-day period at the Penta Hotel in NYC on 33rd St.
    • Blooper
      Plutonium must be alloyed with another metal (usually gallium) in order to prevent forming allotropes which cause it to crack while cooling. Cracks in the pit would have significant impact in the weapon, and could result in a fizzle (non-nuclear explosion.)
    • Citazioni

      Dr. John Matthewson: You try to tough it out with them, they'll lock you in a room somewhere and throw away the room.

    • Connessioni
      Featured in At the Movies: Ferris Bueller's Day Off/Back to School/The Manhattan Project (1986)

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti19

    • How long is The Manhattan Project?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 13 giugno 1986 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paese di origine
      • Stati Uniti
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Juguete mortal
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Suffern, New York, Stati Uniti
    • Azienda produttrice
      • Gladden Entertainment
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 18.000.000 USD (previsto)
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 3.900.000 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 1.503.545 USD
      • 15 giu 1986
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 3.900.000 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 57min(117 min)
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby Stereo
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.