[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario usciteI 250 migliori filmFilm più popolariCerca film per genereI migliori IncassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie filmIndia Film Spotlight
    Cosa c’è in TV e streamingLe 250 migliori serie TVSerie TV più popolariCerca serie TV per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareUltimi trailerOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsPremiazioniFestivalTutti gli eventi
    Nati oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona collaboratoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista dei Preferiti
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Enrico V

Titolo originale: Henry V
  • 1989
  • T
  • 2h 17min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,5/10
32.715
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Kenneth Branagh in Enrico V (1989)
Official Trailer
Riproduci trailer2: 15
6 video
60 foto
EpicHistorical EpicPeriod DramaTragedyWar EpicBiographyDramaHistoryWar

Nel mezzo della Guerra dei Cent'anni, il giovane re Enrico V d'Inghilterra si imbarca nella conquista della Francia nel 1415.Nel mezzo della Guerra dei Cent'anni, il giovane re Enrico V d'Inghilterra si imbarca nella conquista della Francia nel 1415.Nel mezzo della Guerra dei Cent'anni, il giovane re Enrico V d'Inghilterra si imbarca nella conquista della Francia nel 1415.

  • Regia
    • Kenneth Branagh
  • Sceneggiatura
    • William Shakespeare
    • Kenneth Branagh
  • Star
    • Kenneth Branagh
    • Derek Jacobi
    • Simon Shepherd
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    7,5/10
    32.715
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Kenneth Branagh
    • Sceneggiatura
      • William Shakespeare
      • Kenneth Branagh
    • Star
      • Kenneth Branagh
      • Derek Jacobi
      • Simon Shepherd
    • 142Recensioni degli utenti
    • 50Recensioni della critica
    • 83Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Vincitore di 1 Oscar
      • 12 vittorie e 14 candidature totali

    Video6

    Henry V
    Trailer 2:15
    Henry V
    Bowl Cuts, Wild Accents, & an Epic Mud Battle: What to Watch After 'The King'
    Clip 4:17
    Bowl Cuts, Wild Accents, & an Epic Mud Battle: What to Watch After 'The King'
    Bowl Cuts, Wild Accents, & an Epic Mud Battle: What to Watch After 'The King'
    Clip 4:17
    Bowl Cuts, Wild Accents, & an Epic Mud Battle: What to Watch After 'The King'
    Henry V: St. Crispin's Day Speech
    Clip 3:23
    Henry V: St. Crispin's Day Speech
    Henry V: Duke Thomas Beaufort's Message
    Clip 3:41
    Henry V: Duke Thomas Beaufort's Message
    Henry V: Once More Unto The Breach
    Clip 2:29
    Henry V: Once More Unto The Breach
    Kenneth Branagh on His IMDb Best-Known Movies
    Interview 3:42
    Kenneth Branagh on His IMDb Best-Known Movies

    Foto60

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 52
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali50

    Modifica
    Kenneth Branagh
    Kenneth Branagh
    • King Henry V
    Derek Jacobi
    Derek Jacobi
    • Chorus
    Simon Shepherd
    Simon Shepherd
    • Duke Humphrey of Gloucester
    James Larkin
    • Duke John of Bedford
    Brian Blessed
    Brian Blessed
    • Duke Thomas Beaufort of Exeter
    James Simmons
    James Simmons
    • Duke Edward of York
    Paul Gregory
    Paul Gregory
    • Westmoreland
    Charles Kay
    Charles Kay
    • Archbishop of Canterbury
    Alec McCowen
    Alec McCowen
    • Bishop of Ely
    Fabian Cartwright
    • Earl Richard of Cambridge
    Stephen Simms
    • Lord Henry Scroop
    Jay Villiers
    Jay Villiers
    • Sir Thomas Grey
    Edward Jewesbury
    Edward Jewesbury
    • Sir Thomas Erpingham
    Ian Holm
    Ian Holm
    • Captain Fluellen
    Danny Webb
    Danny Webb
    • Gower
    • (as Daniel Webb)
    Jimmy Yuill
    • Jamy
    John Sessions
    John Sessions
    • Macmorris
    Shaun Prendergast
    Shaun Prendergast
    • Bates
    • Regia
      • Kenneth Branagh
    • Sceneggiatura
      • William Shakespeare
      • Kenneth Branagh
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti142

    7,532.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    9scotty12

    Once seen never forgotten

    This film surely must be in the frame for a number of best ever categories - best Shakespeare film adaptation, one of the best ever war films AND one of the best ever performances by a male actor. It's truly stunning to see how Shakespeare's words, which seemed dull and difficult to understand at school, can be spoken as passages of such depth, beauty and power. Not one in a thousand actors could do this convincingly - but Kenneth Branagh can.

    I think this far outshines the Olivier version from 1944 (very good though that was). Branagh convinces (where Olivier does not always) as he gives a wider range of emotional responses to Henry - self questioning, compassionate, sad at the harsh realities of life. You can really believe that here is a young man who used to be a playboy now faced with having to grow up and behave as a king of England. As others have said, he gives such fire and charisma to the battle speeches that you want to march straight into battle yourself! And importantly, Branagh also convinces utterly in the romantic wooing of the French princess.

    Naturally enough, the film focuses on the main actor playing Henry, but the supporting actors are also excellent. Derek Jacobi, particularly, does wonderfully in a difficult role. If I had to give one very slight caveat however, it would be that Emma Thompson (who I love as an actress), does not quite convince as a native French speaker, though she makes a good try at speaking the language rapidly. Perhaps Juliette Binoche would have been better here? But overall the obvious rapport between Branagh and Thompson (who were married at the time) is more important than any slight problems with the accent.

    The only Shakespeare performance that tops this movie is seeing Branagh give a live performance on stage - I was privileged to see him (with Emma Thompson) perform Much Ado About Nothing in the late 1980s, and that's still the best I've ever seen.

    Don't just see this - buy or record a copy. If you see it once, you will most likely want to see it over and over! 10/10
    9jaredpahl

    Straight Shakespeare Has Never Gone Done So Smooth.

    In America, and probably most of the Western world, we are all introduced to the works of William Shakespeare by force. For reasons unknown to us at the time, we're made to read (or follow along with) these ancient plays as some kind of obligatory checkmark in our school careers. Whether Shakespeare was taught to us by teachers who are passionate fans of the material or, more likely, dutiful nannies, it seems we have all started into the world of Shakespeare from the same point. We take for granted why Shakespeare is considered essential. It always begins, for all of us, as boring, incomprehensible Ye Olde English homework, and nothing more.

    And then you see something that convinces you otherwise. For me, it was a field trip to the American Players Theatre for AP English class when I was 16. The play was The Taming of the Shrew. I couldn't tell you what the play was about, I couldn't name to you a single character from memory, but what I do remember is the excitement of watching actors take Shakespeare seriously. Even in a comedy, I could see passion in the performances. This wasn't 14-year-olds reciting "What light through yonder window breaks" in apathetic monotone, this was professionals who made Shakespeare's words sing, almost literally. It was an honest-to-God compelling show, and the first time I remember actually wanting to enjoy Shakespeare. I was with a crowd of people who seemed to get it. They laughed at the right times and they seemed to follow along with the story. If The Taming of the Shrew didn't spark in me a love for Shakespeare, it at least sparked a real interest.

    But onto my main point; Kenneth Branagh's film adaptation of Henry V is the type of thing to spark even more than an interest in Shakespeare for those who were like me. All that business I encountered 9 years ago, the taking it seriously, the passion, the elaborate staging and electricity of a crowd who loved Shakespeare; all those feelings are magnified in Henry V. Here is a movie, Branagh's first ever, that so confidently "gets" Shakespeare, that it ends up an unconditional triumph.

    The major achievement of Henry V, the story of the young English King's valiant attempt to lead an outnumbered force into the Battle of Agincourt, is that word; 'unconditional'. Here we have Shakespeare's prose, his setting, his characters. The movie is without modern punch-ups or any attempts to orient us by re-figuring the story. Barring modern-set narration by Derek Jacobi, Henry V is Straight 'Speare. And somehow, there are no excuses you have to make for Henry V. You don't have to put on the qualifiers, "Shakespeare's language is tough to understand", "Knowing English history would make things clearer", "You need to know the context of the era". No, Branagh overcomes these obstacles with three huge elements: knowledge, passion and artistry.

    Firstly, his understanding of Henry V does wonders. I've never seen or read the play, I don't know what I'm talking about, but still, I can see that Branagh the actor and Branagh the director believe in what they are saying and showing. Maybe it's just a trick of the performance, but when King Henry bellows out the St. Crispin's Day speech, and Patrick Doyle's music swells, it's an ecstatic moment. I don't need someone to explain to me what every word means because Branagh knows it for me. You follow his performance through the film almost like an emotional translator. That's the passion I mentioned. Kenneth Branagh is wildly excited to share his love for Shakespeare with the audience and the same goes for the supporting cast. The memo got to Emma Thompson, Ian Holm, Brian Blessed and the rest; "This is fun, this is exciting. Play it so."

    Then, most importantly, there is Branagh's direction. This is no filmed stage play, and that's a shameful understatement. In fact, Henry V is a stunning piece of cinematic Cin-E-ma. Robust, bold, and gorgeously mounted, Henry V's visual style is in the same league as the very best historical epics. We're talking Braveheart-level artistry from Branagh, who opens the movie on a One Perfect Shot stunner and barely lets up until the final battle. And what a battle his Agincourt is. One does not expect this kind of scope, brutality, and muddy, bloody catharsis out of a Shakespeare adaptation. Doyle's aforementioned music is incredible, marrying so perfectly to the rousing action.

    This Henry V is a Movie movie. Not a quiet and respectful "film adaptation" but an engrossing, stand-up-and-cheer prestige action adventure. That it does this with all the Shakespearian elements intact is its greatest feat. No need for samurai stand-ins or translated dialogue or a modern day setting, this is Shakespeare, straight-up, and it rocks! Seeing Kenneth Branagh's enthusiastic debut film is enough to make you rethink those old high school prejudices. How can a movie with so many 'wherefore's and 'thou's be so badass?

    92/100
    bob the moo

    Delivered with class, passion and meaning that makes up for the limits of budget and a bit of a "tv" feel

    With tensions between England and the arrogant French pushed to breaking point, King Henry the Fifth sets out with his armies to conquer and quell the French in their native land. The film builds up to the historic battle of Agincourt with the troops and the king camping together and making progress across the land, with the French armies preparing for battle as King Henry and his men go from battle to camp to battle on the way to right the wrong of offence caused to England by France.

    When I saw the slightly more famous version of this story from Lawrence Olivier I must admit that I liked it but struggled with simply it was delivered and how the focus was flag-waving. With Branagh's version I was amused by the fact that I got a lot more from it even though it was clearly made with a lot fewer resources to hand. The downside of this is that the film does not have the majesty and the sweep of the dialogue and scenes tend to be smaller and reliant on darkness. At times the cinematography looks drab and does seem like it belongs on the television rather than the cinema but, credit where it is due, the Agincourt battle is impressive regardless of the restrains on it.

    Where the film is better than Olivier's is in the delivery of the language and the direction of the material. Branagh brings out so much more of interest in the material than just national pride. He brings more of the story with the sense of pride countered with the horror of war, the reality of the lower classes and such. The only things I thought he should have dropped were both scenes that involved Katherine, the first was a bit out of step with his vision of the rest of the story, while the final scene makes for a weaker ending than should have been.

    The cast aids him greatly in bringing this approach out to its potential. Branagh himself leads the cast well and gets better as the film goes on and putting as much effort into the smaller moments as he does into the famous scenes. I thought Jacobi was excellent and really sold his narration and made the device of a modern chorus work well. The cast is deep in talent in every area, from characters with big parts to those with only a few moments on screen. Holm, Sessions, Blessed, Coltrane, Scofield, McEwan, Briers, Dench and others are all excellent and a young Christian Bale is good in a minor role.

    Overall then, this may not be considered to be better than Olivier's version but to me it is, thanks to the greater interest it shows in the material. The cast respond well to this and the delivery is with a passion and meaning that makes up for the limits of budget and a bit of a "tv" feel.
    8ElMaruecan82

    The Year Sir Olivier Died, King Henry V was Revived...

    Ever since its release in 1989, critics of "Henry V" felt the obligation to draw a comparaison with the classic 1944 adaptation of the war-driven Shakespearian play by Sir Laurence Olivier; the legend had died that same year and I suppose couldn't watch Kenneth Branagh's vision and compare it with his own as a sort of final full-circle life satisfecit.

    I can see where reviewers are coming from from but then again, I feel the film deserves to be judged on its own standards and be at least compared with the original material. Besides, Olivier's film was released in 1944 when British morals asked for more boosting and the flamboyant play could clearly exploit the audiences' need for patriotic uprising to accompany Churchill's calls of collective efforts and sacrifices. Branagh didn't have such a context to sustain his film, he was simply a Shakespearian actor who understood the timeless appeal of the play and decided to direct it with his boiling and proud Irish soul emphasizing the war aspect and the impetuousness of the king, reacting with irreverence to French condescendance.

    And what he came up with is simply a captivating and gripping war-movie with a special uses of lights and darkness to isolate the earlier moments with shades of solemnity. Roger Ebert complained that the bishops' part, handled by Olivier with a little comical approach, was too talkative and needlessly expositional in the film. Personally, I feel that Branagh wanted to point out that the sort of tacit pressure exercised on the fresh shoulders of the Prince creating a rather stressful situation, Henry V who was in his late twenties wasn't a reknown warmonger but if any war against France could be tainted with legitimacy (the famous Salic wars) he would at least consider it.

    The real trigger is the provocation from the Dolphin and the infamous tennis balls destined to mock his inexperience; that moment is the first hint that Branagh had nothing to envy from Olivier and would make him rather proud: the small grin that draws in his face before he can finally decide to turn the provocation back to the French throne is one of the first acting punches he hits and the best is still to come. Branagh might have intended to make a character study out of the play, an indication of the ordeal being a king in war times is, with the whole self-questioning about worthiness of war, when you're left with the Cornelian choice between war and dishonor.

    "Henry V" is a legitimate film and the only concession to the play is the chorus (Derek Jacobi) who reveals his modern clothes in the exterior parts. For all its realism, "Henry V" had to open with the iconic "muses of fire" tirade, it lacks the surprise effect of Olivier's film where stage slowly turns into a real background but Branagh opts for these lyrical interludes to keep in line with the play's spirit, a little concession to story before embracing history. The chorus is more a narrator than a ringmaster here.

    So the film displays a VIP gallery of British actors: Judi Dench, Robbie Coltrane as Falstaff, a young Christian Bale as the luggage-boy, Emma Thompson as Katherine, Maggie Smith and Paul Scofield who played the tired and worn-down Charles VI. They're all great but the one bravura performance comes from Branagh who delivers the first rousing speech culminating with "To the breach" during the siege of Harfleur. Branagh passes the test wonderfully and at that time never fails to convince us that he's not only the true heir of his royal ancestors but of Laurence Olivier. But while Olivier put them battles in broad daylight emphasizing the naturalness of the location, Branagh turns them into mud and rain with black and brownish tones that make blood make one with dirt... as you would expect from a modern film, the fights are realistic,

    The deaths are as impressive as in the most efficient war-movies culminating with a seemingly Pyrrhic victory when the British soldiers triumph but out of despair, French had all squires and page boys killed. The film provides us the most heart-breaking moment with 'Non Nobis and Te Deum' song performed by Patrick Doyle while Henry is carrying young Bale on his back. The track shot is long and the look and pain in his face is genuine but the scene marks the film's own personality and Branagh seems like carrying a legacy of hundreds of year (counting the 1944 adaptation) and he does with such an attachment to his role that he deserved the acting nomination.

    He also was nominated for Directing (like Olivier) but didn't win. It's ironic that Mel Gibson would win for a similar film but maybe Gibson had the benefit of 'freedom' (no pun intended) by distancing himself from a previously existing work so he could throw some picturesque quality in the fights and make them look new, if not original. Branagh had no care about poetry in his fight scenes, it's just chaotic, furious, fiery and maybe closest to what the battle would have looked for real. It's still a wonderful tour-de-force from Branagh who revives the film by understanding the value of the play as a war-movie precursor:, as I sad in my review of Olivier's play, it set many templates of the genre and Branagh knew how to transcend them.

    The concluding little romance with Emma Thompson is perhaps the one flaw I could agree with Ebert who said the characters weren't so romantically developed to make that ending emotionally rewarding and maybe Branagh would have better left it, but maybe he knew this is a part of the play audiences expect and needed to end his film with something more uplifting, allowing him to display a more relaxed range of emotion.

    All in all, this is a glorious superproduction and a wonderful consecration of Branagh as the Olivier of his times.... And I guess I'm also guilty of reviewing by comparaison.
    catherine_ell69

    Great performances by all the actors

    The unique think about this film is that there aren't any weak performance amongst any of the actors, however small their role.

    One actor I feels merits a mention is Christopher Ravenscroft for his portrayal of the French Herald, Mountjoy. He plays a key part in this ply as the only character who meets both English and French leaders until after the battle.

    His shock and awe in the tennis balls scene when her realises that Henry isn't a silly young man is terrific.

    Great film. I've got on video and watch two or three times a year. My teenage sons were gripped by it. This is the way to introduce teenagers to Shakespeare.

    Catherine

    Altri elementi simili

    Hamlet
    7,7
    Hamlet
    Molto rumore per nulla
    7,3
    Molto rumore per nulla
    Enrico V
    7,0
    Enrico V
    L'altro delitto
    6,8
    L'altro delitto
    Gli amici di Peter
    7,0
    Gli amici di Peter
    Riccardo III
    7,3
    Riccardo III
    Riccardo III
    7,3
    Riccardo III
    Nel bel mezzo di un gelido inverno
    7,2
    Nel bel mezzo di un gelido inverno
    Giulio Cesare
    7,2
    Giulio Cesare
    Amleto
    6,7
    Amleto
    Il leone d'inverno
    7,8
    Il leone d'inverno
    The Life of Henry the Fifth
    7,4
    The Life of Henry the Fifth

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      This was one of Marlon Brando's and Stanley Kubrick's favorite movies.
    • Blooper
      The Treaty of Troyes (1420) is shown as taking place a week or so after the Battle of Agincourt (1415). This is the result of cuts from William Shakespeare's text. The play does acknowledge that more time has gone by.
    • Citazioni

      [Addressing the troops]

      King Henry V: And Crispin Crispian shall ne'er go by from this day until the ending of the world but we in it shall be remembered. We few, we happy few, we band of brothers, For he today who sheds his blood with me shall be my brother, Be he ne'er so vile, this day shall gentle his condition, and gentlemen in England now abed shall think themselves acursed they were not here, and hold their manhoods cheap whilst any speaks, that fought with us upon St. Crispin's day!

    • Curiosità sui crediti
      The Chorus starts the film by opening the doors to the English court in the Prologue, and ends the film by closing those doors in the Epilogue.
    • Connessioni
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: Back to the Future Part II/All Dogs Go to Heaven/Henry V/Prancer/Sidewalk Stories (1989)

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti30

    • How long is Henry V?Powered by Alexa
    • Henry V is based on the Shakespearian play of the same name. What are the play and film about?
    • Is the film a direct adaptation of the play?
    • How historically accurate is the film/play?

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 8 novembre 1989 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paese di origine
      • Regno Unito
    • Lingue
      • Inglese
      • Francese
      • Latino
    • Celebre anche come
      • Enrique V
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Crowlink, East Sussex, Inghilterra, Regno Unito(exteriors: prologue - cliffs)
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Renaissance Films
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 9.000.000 USD (previsto)
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 10.161.099 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 64.933 USD
      • 12 nov 1989
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 10.161.211 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      2 ore 17 minuti
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby Stereo
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    Kenneth Branagh in Enrico V (1989)
    Divario superiore
    What is the Hindi language plot outline for Enrico V (1989)?
    Rispondi
    • Visualizza altre lacune di informazioni
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.