VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
4608
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA serial killer in Los Angeles celebrates Jack the Ripper's 100th birthday by committing similar murders.A serial killer in Los Angeles celebrates Jack the Ripper's 100th birthday by committing similar murders.A serial killer in Los Angeles celebrates Jack the Ripper's 100th birthday by committing similar murders.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
Because DTV (Direct-To-Video) thrillers have a reputation for being the "bastard stepchildren" of larger budgeted cable, TV and big screen fare, some great little movies that hold dynamite performances have a tendency to become underrated and overlooked. This was definitely one of them.
James Spader gives a performance every bit as remarkable as that of Jeremy Irons in DEAD RINGERS, playing twins who become embroiled in a murder mystery involving a serial killer, who is copycatting the infamous Jack the Ripper's horrendous legacy of bloody terror, down to the most minute details.
B-movie pro Herrington knows how to keep the action, cinematography and editing going at maximum warp, so that the glaring inconsistencies and gaping plot holes are apparent only on repeated viewings. But if you can get past that, you will be rewarded by Spader's performance, (which gives one all the more reason to wonder why this man is not a major star right now), as well as some fine turns by Cynthia Gibb (TV's FAME), Jim Haynie, TWIN PEAKS' Chris Mulkey (another criminally overlooked actor), and a wickedly enjoyable portrayal by Rod Loomis, as a local doctor who knows a lot more about the murders than he lets on.
A nice little surprise that's worth seeking out on the shelves of your local video palace when all the "good" stuff is gone for the weekend.
James Spader gives a performance every bit as remarkable as that of Jeremy Irons in DEAD RINGERS, playing twins who become embroiled in a murder mystery involving a serial killer, who is copycatting the infamous Jack the Ripper's horrendous legacy of bloody terror, down to the most minute details.
B-movie pro Herrington knows how to keep the action, cinematography and editing going at maximum warp, so that the glaring inconsistencies and gaping plot holes are apparent only on repeated viewings. But if you can get past that, you will be rewarded by Spader's performance, (which gives one all the more reason to wonder why this man is not a major star right now), as well as some fine turns by Cynthia Gibb (TV's FAME), Jim Haynie, TWIN PEAKS' Chris Mulkey (another criminally overlooked actor), and a wickedly enjoyable portrayal by Rod Loomis, as a local doctor who knows a lot more about the murders than he lets on.
A nice little surprise that's worth seeking out on the shelves of your local video palace when all the "good" stuff is gone for the weekend.
This was recommended on my Amazon prime. It looked like a hokey, made for TV movie. I decided to throw it on and it definitely was a hokey, made for TV movie but I really enjoyed it. Most roles I've seen Spader play have been arrogant and not all that likeable. I really enjoyed seeing him play the good guy(s) and for whatever reason, found him to be really attractive in this movie. The copy cat murders don't really have much to do with the movie, it mostly focuses on Spaders character. I enjoyed it and would watch it again.
I caught this on TV late at night. Thought it would just be some
typical 80's slasher movie, but I was pleasantly surprised to see
what a genuinely well-made thriller this was. It's a basic potboiler
story, but thoughtfully executed and James Spader is excellent in a
dual role as twin brothers. It's got a little bit of everything --
reincarnating the Jack the Ripper myth, twin brothers who are (of
course) total opposites, a bit of the paranormal, a great whodunit
mystery, and some genuinely creepy scenes. Spader really makes
this watchable -- the story's solid enough, but his performance is
just so much fun to watch. He plays one twin, who is the affable,
friendly doctor who works in a local free clinic, and then his
anti-hero bad-boy twin brother who works a minimum-wage job,
has shady connections, but ultimately shares his brother's sense
of justice and good heart. And Spader's performance isn't the
typical uber-yuppie, not a whiny preppy wimp, and not a total
psychopath. He's just playing an average guy trying to do the right
thing, save the girl, and clear his brother's name by finding the real
murderer. It's good stuff! For James Spader fans, I think it's a great
chance to see him do yet another unique job of character
interpretation.
typical 80's slasher movie, but I was pleasantly surprised to see
what a genuinely well-made thriller this was. It's a basic potboiler
story, but thoughtfully executed and James Spader is excellent in a
dual role as twin brothers. It's got a little bit of everything --
reincarnating the Jack the Ripper myth, twin brothers who are (of
course) total opposites, a bit of the paranormal, a great whodunit
mystery, and some genuinely creepy scenes. Spader really makes
this watchable -- the story's solid enough, but his performance is
just so much fun to watch. He plays one twin, who is the affable,
friendly doctor who works in a local free clinic, and then his
anti-hero bad-boy twin brother who works a minimum-wage job,
has shady connections, but ultimately shares his brother's sense
of justice and good heart. And Spader's performance isn't the
typical uber-yuppie, not a whiny preppy wimp, and not a total
psychopath. He's just playing an average guy trying to do the right
thing, save the girl, and clear his brother's name by finding the real
murderer. It's good stuff! For James Spader fans, I think it's a great
chance to see him do yet another unique job of character
interpretation.
A serial killer in Los Angeles celebrates Jack the Ripper's 100th anniversary by committing similar murders.
My first thought was how strange this film was for starting when there was only one murder left. It seems like it would make more sense to start at the first murder and allow the characters to solve the mystery of the pattern. Instead, they know from the opening scene that the killer is following the pattern of Jack the Ripper. This takes out much of the mystery element...
The cast here is pretty great, with both James Spader and Robert Picardo, both (I think) before becoming bigger names. Spader always had that boy next door charm, and Picardo is interesting and plays his role as a psychiatrist well, coming off as very suspicious at all the right moments.
The New York Times said "is so dull it leaves you plenty of time to marvel at how a plot can be this rickety, how a production can look this shabby, and how the first-time writer and director Rowdy Herrington could borrow a story with so relentless a grip on our imaginations and in no time at all declaw it." This seems terribly harsh. While not the greatest movie, it is still much better than many films out there, and had a premise that was enough to carry it.
I watched this film on Netflix, and I am told this version is different from the one on VHS or that was shown in theaters. I would be curious to know the differences, as I am told they are big enough to completely change the plot of the film... I liked the version I saw, but maybe the other is even better?
My first thought was how strange this film was for starting when there was only one murder left. It seems like it would make more sense to start at the first murder and allow the characters to solve the mystery of the pattern. Instead, they know from the opening scene that the killer is following the pattern of Jack the Ripper. This takes out much of the mystery element...
The cast here is pretty great, with both James Spader and Robert Picardo, both (I think) before becoming bigger names. Spader always had that boy next door charm, and Picardo is interesting and plays his role as a psychiatrist well, coming off as very suspicious at all the right moments.
The New York Times said "is so dull it leaves you plenty of time to marvel at how a plot can be this rickety, how a production can look this shabby, and how the first-time writer and director Rowdy Herrington could borrow a story with so relentless a grip on our imaginations and in no time at all declaw it." This seems terribly harsh. While not the greatest movie, it is still much better than many films out there, and had a premise that was enough to carry it.
I watched this film on Netflix, and I am told this version is different from the one on VHS or that was shown in theaters. I would be curious to know the differences, as I am told they are big enough to completely change the plot of the film... I liked the version I saw, but maybe the other is even better?
This item might be trapped in its 80s decor (fashion, music), but this stylishly compelling and crisp psychological thriller holds it cards close and leads the way with an appealingly subtle and sincere James Spader performance. This guy has charisma! And he strongly pulls off the whole dual part of playing twins. The premise is one of those, the less you know, the better off you are. When you think you have it figured out, you'll find yourself at square one again. It's a simple, but cleverly penned whodunit murder mystery story. Its odd and manipulative multi-layered structure offers unpredictable turns, hidden clues, suspicious red herrings, but in the long run leaves some spotty developments and a real lack of motivation. It might annoy and could've used some tweaking, but the well-paced story (that takes time to give our protagonist some depth) and sense of urgency just grips you that you just go with it. Director / writer Rowdy Herrington's directorial debut shows assurance in his abilities. The thrills are routine, but confidently done with razor-sharp timing and jarring force. They're menacing, brooding, bloody and a little disturbing. He really does hold you at bay with powerful visuals and anxious suspense. The moody photography and lighting composition drills in well with the stirringly blues music score. This blends well in with eerily glum and sullen atmospheric tinge coming from the Los Angles' setting. The performances are well-suited. Spader is the film's main drive, but Cynthia Gibb is capably good and Robert Picardo turns in a sound performance. Its also stars Jim Haynie, Chris Mulkey, Rod Loomis, John Wesley and Rex Ryon in amusingly fine support.
A wonderfully quirky and darkly projected thriller that's better than your average output.
A wonderfully quirky and darkly projected thriller that's better than your average output.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDirector Rowdy Harrington originally wanted the movie to be titled "Red Rain" and Peter Gabriel's song of the same name was meant to play at the opening credits. Since this was a low budget film, he couldn't get the rights to the song, so he hired Paul Saax to compose the song "Red Harvest" instead. Shortly before the movie release, the studio felt that the title "Red Rain" had no relation to the plot so they decided to change to a more appealing title, "Jack's Back".
- BlooperIdentical twins do not have the same fingerprints.
- Citazioni
Sam Hilliard: This is an emergency. May we come in?
Chris Moscari: I'm not really dressed.
Scott Morofsky: It's okay, we're police officers.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Jack's Back?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Delitti perfetti
- Luoghi delle riprese
- 901 E. Edgeware Road, Los Angeles, CA 90026, Stati Uniti(Interior and exterior. John Wesford's apartment.)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.000.000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti