Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaIt's suspected that a peace/anti-nuke organization in UK has some extremists willing to use terrorism. The action will probably be against an embassy in London. The SAS/Special Air Service t... Leggi tuttoIt's suspected that a peace/anti-nuke organization in UK has some extremists willing to use terrorism. The action will probably be against an embassy in London. The SAS/Special Air Service try to get the organization infiltrated.It's suspected that a peace/anti-nuke organization in UK has some extremists willing to use terrorism. The action will probably be against an embassy in London. The SAS/Special Air Service try to get the organization infiltrated.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
- Major Steele
- (as Maurice Röeves)
- Malek
- (as Aharon Ipale)
Recensioni in evidenza
The main reason for seeing the movie was the action by the Special Air Service (SAS). SOF magazine said the SAS cooperated in the making of the movie. I thought the movie was a little long but the action parts were first rate. The final part was the best part. The best part was when the camera was filming through the gas mask and you could hear and see what it is really like to be on the inside. I remember the huffing and puffing and the words, "One terrorist down, one terrorist down" as each one got shot. SOF magazine said when the SAS goes in, there are no prisoners taken-only dead terrorists. As a real law enforcement person I am always complaining how the public has no idea of what really happens during police actions. The public always seems to ask why did the police not shoot the gun out of a persons hand or why did the police shoot or didn't shoot. Split second decisions have to be made and it is so easy to to be a "Monday morning quarterback" They never see the confusion. I think every person who thinks the cops are always wrong should see this movie.
Their has never been a movie that comes this close to showing the general public the SAS, their training, and their skills, which makes the movie so damn good.
One thing that i was a bit disappointed about, was the fact that if they had made the film 3 years later (1985), they (At the start when their in the mountains in Wales) would have been using the SA80 rifle, which is much cooler than the one they were using in the movie (The FN-FAL or something like that).
An overall wicked movie that I would recommend to anybody that's interested in the military, and who loves guns and violence!!!!!!
While the plot seems a little slow at times (an illusion created by watching too many hollywood action movies), and (as many people here have commented) the dialog can get a little cheesy, add to the fact that the hairstyles, clothing, vehicles, etc... look dated now. But that's not what I was watching the film for.
The actual action sequences in the film are typical special operations style action sequences, i.e. they're over practically before they've started! This film, if not realistic (I'm sure it is, but as someone who doesn't know how the SAS really operate, I couldn't comment), is totally believable. From the handover by the police to the military, through the planning phase of the operation, the MOE (fast-roping from helicopters onto the roof, then abseiling down the side of the building), the total communication throughout the assault. It's absolutely breathtaking.
This is no Hollywood Action Movie. It's totally different from the likes of "Operation Delta Force", etc... There are no cheesy one-liners when a terrorist is dropped. There is no jumping about, emptying whole magazines (and more!) into people, shooting from the hip at targets 200 metres away and hitting them with the first shot, while snipers on the opposite side couldn't hit the Titanic from 2 metres away.
So, to sum up, I'd give the plot, characters and acting 7/10, but the action sequences, I'd wholeheartdly give 12/10! Fantastic stuff...
And as someone who studied in Europe for several years and saw the political far left in action on the streets of the major cities, I can tell you that many of them talked just like they do in the movie. And yes, the guerrilla theatre production lampooning the US is accurate, that type of theatre did take place.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhen the movie's grand action sequence, the storming of the embassy by SAS troopers, to be played by movie stuntmen, was about to be filmed, the real-life SAS soldiers offered to do the sequence for the production, not requiring the use of stuntmen. For director Ian Sharp, it was an offer he simply couldn't refuse, as this level of authenticity couldn't be achieved by acting stuntmen, no matter how well trained.
- BlooperPeter Skellen was a member of the Armed Forces and had only been separated from his family for a couple of weeks which is nothing to the separation normally endured so meeting up with his wife because he missed her thus blowing his cover was ridiculous.
- Citazioni
[S.A.S. burst into Mews and kill the terrorists]
Policeman at Mews: Could you blokes do that again? It was a bit fast for me.
- Curiosità sui creditiIn final credits, "Military Advisors" are listed as "Anonymous."
- ConnessioniFeatured in At the Movies: The Stinkers of 1983 (1983)
I più visti
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- The Final Option
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 6.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 2.666.873 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 750.259 USD
- 18 set 1983
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2.666.873 USD