Una leggenda popolare tramandata da decenni, che narra di un assassino squilibrato che uccide chi festeggia San Valentino, si rivela vera quando un gruppo di persone osa sfidare gli ordini d... Leggi tuttoUna leggenda popolare tramandata da decenni, che narra di un assassino squilibrato che uccide chi festeggia San Valentino, si rivela vera quando un gruppo di persone osa sfidare gli ordini dell'assassino e la gente inizia a morire.Una leggenda popolare tramandata da decenni, che narra di un assassino squilibrato che uccide chi festeggia San Valentino, si rivela vera quando un gruppo di persone osa sfidare gli ordini dell'assassino e la gente inizia a morire.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
- Mike
- (as Tom Kovacs)
Recensioni in evidenza
Normally, this is where I say that the cast is made up of oversexed, annoyingly attractive teenagers. But not this time. Here we have oversexed, annoying UGLY teenagers. Don't ask me why (and I promise you that I'm no oil painting!) but this must be the ugliest group of leading actors every assembled to be chopped up by a nut-job with a gas mask and pick axe. I guess we can blame it on the eighties. Or the lack of budget needed to bring bigger (and more physically attractive) stars on board.
Yes, one by one our facially-challenged heroes are chopped up in various hideous ways. Nothing too new there, apart from the fact that the death scenes seem a little more violent for the time than your average Friday 13th film. Notice I don't say 'gruesome' – only violent. I mentioned the budget earlier and it seems like they didn't really have enough money for expert make-up and prosthetics needed for the gore. I suppose it's the way it's filmed that makes it so violent. There seems like there's a real sense of nastiness in the deaths.
Not that you'll care much about those getting sliced and diced. They really are pretty irritating. If Jar-Jar Binks was a little less computer-generated and a little more eighties then those are the people getting murdered here.
Perhaps one thing that the film does have going for it is that you don't actually know who's under the gas mask. In that was it's more akin to the 'Scream' franchise in as much as like a who-done-it.
There's not much new here (especially nearly forty years later!), but if you're into the slasher genre in general and like to see where this type of film found its roots, then give this a try. The gore isn't really there and the violence – although strong for the time – has also diminished, the mystery element may make it worth an hour and a half of your time.
Better than your average slasher-horror, not that this says much. Reasonable set up, and a decent amount of intrigue. Does fall back on many horror clichés, and the performances are so-so. Plot is ultimately fairly formulaic, but has its moments.
Director George Mihalka brings us another holiday-themed slasher, riding the success of "Black Christmas", "Halloween" and "Friday the 13th"... and paving the way for "April Fools Day". But George is a nice guy and I don't want to say he's just one among the crowd. There were hundreds of 80s slashers, but only a few stand out today. "Bloody Valentine" is, of course, one of them.
Even in its original, neutered glory (anywhere from three to nine minutes were cut) the film stands as a good film. Without any really notable actors or actresses (okay, so Neil Affleck had a brief role in "Scanners"), and being Mihalka's one big mark, the film carries itself on story, acting and blood. The blood, while lacking a times, comes gushing through in others. And like any good slasher, the killer's identity is not revealed until the end... leaving us guessing until the last twist of the knife (or ax).
Slasher fans need to pick up the Lions Gate special edition. While the double-disc with "April Fools Day" is cheap and still worth watching, you don't really know this film until you've seen it uncut. The gore, oh my, the gore! It's actually a shame that it took so long for a company to come along and save this film because it was even better than we once assumed... Mihalka could have been one of the 80s greats (and, in my mind, he still is).
If you've been a horror fan and avoided this one, please see it. Sure, it's mostly mindless fun -- kids drinking and making out, getting hacked up -- but I can watch variations of this formula dozens, scores or hundreds of times. There's something fun about a simple stalking film that you can't always get from other films that try too hard to be clever. And I like thinking films, but a night with buddies and booze... you need a slasher. And this is the one you should pick.
The scenes filmed in an actual mine - where the protagonists are trapped with the killer lurking around with a sharpened pickaxe - are expertly filmed with plenty of style and a menacing atmosphere. The acting is decent and although some of the characters act like jerks they are likable and human enough for the viewer to care about them. They are all working class stiffs and just want a good time and relief from the reality of their everyday situation. You want them to have their valentine party that has been denied them for obvious reasons.
Notorious for being one of the most censored films by the MPAA at the time of release to avoid an 'X' rating, it is now available in an uncut form on Lionsgate DVD. The death scenes are much more detailed and graphic, but either version is worth watching for the flourish that the director and his cast and crew have imbued into this little horror gem.
A slasher classic with an energetic cast. They did a pretty good job concealing the identity of the killer.
Paramount Pictures wasted a huge franchise potential by not follow-up more sequels for this film.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn an interview with TerrorTrap.com director George Mihalka said that the shooting location at Sydney Mines, Nova Scotia was chosen because of its rustic atmospheric appearance, but when the locals found out that a movie was to be shot there they decided to spend tens of thousands of dollars to have the mine painted and cleaned. This, of course, diminished the reason that the production wanted the location to begin with. Mihalka said that $75,000 of the film's budget was then used to return the mine to its original state for shooting.
- BlooperWhen riding down into the mine, Howard drinks a beer. When he tips the can up, you can see holes from a church key type can opener on the bottom of the can.
- Citazioni
[last lines]
Axel Palmer: Hanniger, I'll be in Hell waiting for you! Harry? Harry, I'm coming! This whole FUCKING TOWN is going to die! We're coming back, you bastards! Sarah, be my bloody Valentine! Daddy's gone away, Harry Warden made you pay...
- Curiosità sui creditiAt the beginning of the rolling credits, you will hear the evil-doer miner (Harry Warden) laugh.
- Versioni alternativeThe original British cinema print was also the pre-cut version. However, it did restore the ending. The footage was obviously from a different source and cut back into the film.
- ConnessioniEdited into 365 days, also known as a Year (2019)
I più visti
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 2.300.000 CA$ (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 5.672.031 USD
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 5.673.343 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1