Chi era Gesù? In che cosa consistevano i suoi miracoli? Cosa ha fatto prima degli ultimi tre anni della sua vita? È veramente resciuscitato? Come si può spiegare l'affascinante mistero della... Leggi tuttoChi era Gesù? In che cosa consistevano i suoi miracoli? Cosa ha fatto prima degli ultimi tre anni della sua vita? È veramente resciuscitato? Come si può spiegare l'affascinante mistero della Sacra Sindone? A queste e altre domande risponde questo film, sulla base di documenti sto... Leggi tuttoChi era Gesù? In che cosa consistevano i suoi miracoli? Cosa ha fatto prima degli ultimi tre anni della sua vita? È veramente resciuscitato? Come si può spiegare l'affascinante mistero della Sacra Sindone? A queste e altre domande risponde questo film, sulla base di documenti storici.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Foto
- Thomas
- (as Jeffrey Druce)
Recensioni in evidenza
These were the same guys who made a lot of low budget family films that were shown in the "second run" theatres back in the 70's (remember those?). Some were OK, but most were grade z. The blockbusters like Star Wars pretty much killed the market for these at the movie house, but you see a lot of stuff like this in the straight-to-video market these days. I guess they can spend more on the production, less on the distribution...
However, the detailed crucifixion scene is, in terms of historical accuracy, superior to similar scenes in such widescreen Hollywood extravaganzas as "Ben-Hur," "King of Kings," and "The Greatest Story Ever Told." Rather than dragging his entire cross to Golgotha, for example, John Rubinstein simply carries his crossbeam strapped across his shoulders to his outstretched arms. Nails aren't driven through his palms but instead through his wrists. His feet aren't nailed separately but one is placed over the other so that just one nail need be used. Incidentally, Rubinstein's flogging prior to his crucifixion ranks 35th in the book, "Lash! The Hundred Great Scenes of Men Being Whipped in the Movies."
Of course, Rubinstein and the two thieves wear modest loincloths, which probably isn't true to the shameful reality of Roman crucifixions, but allowances must be made. Curiously, the "good" thief is positioned on the left hand of Jesus, which goes against a long-standing tradition. Just why this thief is played by a pudgy, overweight man is, however, a mystery, especially in view of the fact that the "bad" thief is something of a "hunk."
Sadly, "Historic Jesus" is really little more than a third-rate dramatization of the life of Christ. Unlike Shick-Sunn's more superior "In Search of Noah's Ark" which spends the majority of its running time discussing the possibility that the ark is resting on the earth today and where that might be, this film is basically the story of Jesus with no effort made to prove or disprove his existence. The famed Shroud of Turrin is mentioned, but little other detective work is given much screen time.
For fans of these quasi-documentary films like "Jupiter Menace" and "In Search of Bigfoot", etc., this movie doesn't offer much.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizSunn Classic Pictures would rent theaters for a two-week period but the initial promos would claim the film would run for "One Week Only." On the 7th day the promos would claim that it was the "Final Day." The next day the television spots and print ads would claim that the film was "Held Over."
- BlooperWhen Jesus walks on the water, the platform just under the surface of the water can be seen,
I più visti
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 250.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 31 minuti
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1