Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA group of cute, young women in USSR are trained to be spies in USA, using their bodies to seduce. Elena passes and is sent to Moscow, where she meets a single, American man.A group of cute, young women in USSR are trained to be spies in USA, using their bodies to seduce. Elena passes and is sent to Moscow, where she meets a single, American man.A group of cute, young women in USSR are trained to be spies in USA, using their bodies to seduce. Elena passes and is sent to Moscow, where she meets a single, American man.
Catherine Lafond
- Alexandra
- (as Catherine Lalonde)
Recensioni in evidenza
This is a typical North American spy-romantic film about the USSR, based on a cliche from the 50s.
In the center of the story is a young woman from a rural part of Russia who for some reason was chosen by the KGB for its operations.
Most likely, this was done to make it easier for the viewer to believe in the purity of her motives, selfless love for "freedom" and religion.
In reality, a city dweller with a good background in English would be chosen for such a job.
But this movie is a fairy tale for housewives and lovers of inexpensive exotics.
The special school also looks very funny. It's a cross between a barracks and a church school, where instead of strict nuns and sergeants there are KGB officers.
Most likely, the film was shot in Canada, judging by the large number of Lada cars of the sixth model.
Acting is quite tolerable for such an inexpensive product. Franciscus is convincing in the role of a protective mentor, and Geena Davis and Linda Hamilton in the roles of naive girls. The final scene turned out to be very touching and elegant.
Otherwise, it is quite a cheap trinket in order to amuse the inhabitants of the "free world" and make them think that everyone dreams of their freedom, and not just about a high standard of living with affordable cars, affordable food, clothes and other really objective advantages.
In the center of the story is a young woman from a rural part of Russia who for some reason was chosen by the KGB for its operations.
Most likely, this was done to make it easier for the viewer to believe in the purity of her motives, selfless love for "freedom" and religion.
In reality, a city dweller with a good background in English would be chosen for such a job.
But this movie is a fairy tale for housewives and lovers of inexpensive exotics.
The special school also looks very funny. It's a cross between a barracks and a church school, where instead of strict nuns and sergeants there are KGB officers.
Most likely, the film was shot in Canada, judging by the large number of Lada cars of the sixth model.
Acting is quite tolerable for such an inexpensive product. Franciscus is convincing in the role of a protective mentor, and Geena Davis and Linda Hamilton in the roles of naive girls. The final scene turned out to be very touching and elegant.
Otherwise, it is quite a cheap trinket in order to amuse the inhabitants of the "free world" and make them think that everyone dreams of their freedom, and not just about a high standard of living with affordable cars, affordable food, clothes and other really objective advantages.
One of the great thrills the medias film and DVD give me is the possibility to travel in time. B movies are often very rewarding in this aspect as they reflect the feel of a certain era in a certain place without the slightest pretenses and therefore all the purer. Secret Weapons is a perfect example to illustrate that.
In 1985 the Red Scare still was very real in the Western World. The Soviet Empire seemed to be an intact hostile machinery, its potential of committing evil actions boundless. There were reports of Western men who were put into uncomfortable situations by female baits" and later subjected to blackmail (didn't the West reciprocate in kind?) The script for this movie draws from stories of that sort and basically tells about a bait school" in which innocent Russian girls are turned into Communist femmes fatales in the name of the Motherland.
On the whole the story is not credible. No research at all seems to have been made either into any real case of seduction or into the behavior of people in Russia when they are amongst each other. The movie suggests that all Russian women are (or were then) prudes and had first to be corrupted by the System. I have my doubts about that. Anyway, the actors all come through as Americans who are dressed up as Russians, including a fake Russian accent which in itself has some fascination and charm. The bait school" seems to be fashioned after the FBI Academy in Quantico as we know it from the movies, which is quite amusing.
Morals play quite an important role in Secret Weapons. The teachers of the girls, a married couple who once were on a kind of assignment in the US, have to explain American ethics to them. They tell them that America is a sex crazed nation, screening some innocent TV commercials to them as proof. Basically they learn that in America women are regarded primarily as sex objects which can be used as a secret weapon or a trade advantage. What I my opinion could be considered an arguable universal truth is reduced here to a US specialty which tells more about the makers of the movie than about reality. The main character certainly becomes aware of the basically self demeaning character of her job" and the doubtful results of her actions, but unfortunately these doubts (which are also expressed in a very American kind of way) are not really explored.
Back to the aspect of time travel. This movie is a joy to watch just for the set design, the wardrobe and the hairdos and the pasting of some Cyrillic posters on the walls of Quebec (where the location shots were done). Its great how the portraits of those two geezers look down on the youngster who just have been ordered to get acquainted and have (taped) sexual intercourse, while they are starting a kind of a disco in the Quantico like place did you recognize them, the geezers? I did. It was Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Ustinovich Chernenko. Chernenko looks flushed even in the heavily doctored black and white Soviet icon, he ruled the Soviet Empire for circa 13 months in a state of half mummification a sure sign that not all was well there, even then.
In 1985 the Red Scare still was very real in the Western World. The Soviet Empire seemed to be an intact hostile machinery, its potential of committing evil actions boundless. There were reports of Western men who were put into uncomfortable situations by female baits" and later subjected to blackmail (didn't the West reciprocate in kind?) The script for this movie draws from stories of that sort and basically tells about a bait school" in which innocent Russian girls are turned into Communist femmes fatales in the name of the Motherland.
On the whole the story is not credible. No research at all seems to have been made either into any real case of seduction or into the behavior of people in Russia when they are amongst each other. The movie suggests that all Russian women are (or were then) prudes and had first to be corrupted by the System. I have my doubts about that. Anyway, the actors all come through as Americans who are dressed up as Russians, including a fake Russian accent which in itself has some fascination and charm. The bait school" seems to be fashioned after the FBI Academy in Quantico as we know it from the movies, which is quite amusing.
Morals play quite an important role in Secret Weapons. The teachers of the girls, a married couple who once were on a kind of assignment in the US, have to explain American ethics to them. They tell them that America is a sex crazed nation, screening some innocent TV commercials to them as proof. Basically they learn that in America women are regarded primarily as sex objects which can be used as a secret weapon or a trade advantage. What I my opinion could be considered an arguable universal truth is reduced here to a US specialty which tells more about the makers of the movie than about reality. The main character certainly becomes aware of the basically self demeaning character of her job" and the doubtful results of her actions, but unfortunately these doubts (which are also expressed in a very American kind of way) are not really explored.
Back to the aspect of time travel. This movie is a joy to watch just for the set design, the wardrobe and the hairdos and the pasting of some Cyrillic posters on the walls of Quebec (where the location shots were done). Its great how the portraits of those two geezers look down on the youngster who just have been ordered to get acquainted and have (taped) sexual intercourse, while they are starting a kind of a disco in the Quantico like place did you recognize them, the geezers? I did. It was Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Ustinovich Chernenko. Chernenko looks flushed even in the heavily doctored black and white Soviet icon, he ruled the Soviet Empire for circa 13 months in a state of half mummification a sure sign that not all was well there, even then.
This was a surprise for me. I did not know what to expect from this movie and found it very good. Linda Hamilton is the star and she is very good playing a simple Russian Girl who is recruited to join a sex school so she can be used to compromise US men. There is a scene with her being forced to strip down to just her bra and panties and its intense. Also in the movie, but a smaller part but well done is a young Gena Davis. This was a highly enjoyable movie, strongly recommended.
This movie is an good movie and entertaining. However there are a lot of movie watchers that really like Geena Davis today but she is not the star in this one but now she typically is the star from the early 90's up to today 2013. Linda Hamilton is very good as the star and was also good in Terminator. I watch just about anything Geena Davis is in as she is very good and her choices for what she plays in is usually good as of the 90's and going forward. Netflix indicated that the date for this movie is 2002 and by looking at it you can tell it had to be before that. The correct date is 1985 as shown in the Information here. If you do like Geena Davis then The Long Kiss Goodnight is a terrific action thriller and Speechless with Michael Keaton is also good and is more of a comedy.
This movie was a big surprise for me. Linda Hamilton playing a simple Russian woman must be challenging. It was kind of kinky for having the Russian women learn about our way of life in the USA. Saying that sex is our religion sounded very absurd to me, back in 1985, it was and it will be throughout the world. Watching Hamilton's character Elena disrobe in front of the other women sounded disturbing, but when everyone else started to do that, it sent shivers down my spine. It's was really about love and escape from the country she served, and she was able to do it that was good. This movie is great for the 80's buff. 4 OUT OF 5 STARS.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizJames Franciscus' final performance.
- BlooperGreat film, excellent premise, which has been done at other times, before and since. When the girls arrive in their flash flat, they are taken aback by all the kitchen toys, like they have never seen them before, and later, Elena does not even know who E.T. is, and yet in both cases, one would think that they would have been trained in all of that, given it was a ten month course in American culture.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Secret Weapons (1985) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi