VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,1/10
1207
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaMata Hari is a beautiful dancer of Dutch origin working in Paris. It is August 1914 and war between France and Germany seems imminent. However, she accepts an invitation to travel to Berlin ... Leggi tuttoMata Hari is a beautiful dancer of Dutch origin working in Paris. It is August 1914 and war between France and Germany seems imminent. However, she accepts an invitation to travel to Berlin as part of a show.Mata Hari is a beautiful dancer of Dutch origin working in Paris. It is August 1914 and war between France and Germany seems imminent. However, she accepts an invitation to travel to Berlin as part of a show.
Toby Rolt
- Jean Prevost
- (as Tobias Rolt)
Recensioni in evidenza
This is a soft-porn version of the life of the real Mata Hari, supposed spy for the Germans, executed by the French in 1917. This movie tries to sanctify MH, but only makes her ridiculous. Her real life and fate was far more interesting than this movie.
A film that takes advantage of two myths, Mata Hari and Sylvia Kristel, in a vain attempt to revive a third one, erotic cinema.
Regarding the first myth, the film is merely inspired by reality, as is usual in cinema, particularly in Hollywood. Sometimes it takes real facts and characters, such as Captain Ledoux, Mrs. MacLeod, living in Java, erotic dances in Paris and Berlin, counter-espionage, the trial and death by firing squad, sometimes fantasy, in love with Karl (in fact her lover was a Russian officer in the service of the French, named Maslov, whom she rescued from enemy lines), the relationship between Karl and Ledoux, the sinister Fraulein Schragmuller and her terrorist conspiracy, and many other aspects of the argument. A recurring criticism in pseudo-biographical fiction.
But where the film most fails is in its attempt to use Kristel, the actress of Emmanuelle and erotic cinema diva of the previous decade, to embody that other erotic myth that is Mata Hari.
Erotic cinema was itself a myth. It never constituted a true genre, but a simple use of the progressive lightening of censorship to sell more and more nudity in the cinema, to the lustful public.
But, in 1985, nudity was already common in most films, even in Hollywood, and it no longer surprised anyone. It is used here in a more abundant dose than usual, but nothing particularly shocking or innovative, even for the time.
This leaves a good production, but focused on Kristel's sex and nudity scenes, which gives what is expected of her, but nothing more than that, because she was never a particularly gifted actress. Just a beautiful and elegant face and body, which cinema used to sell eroticism.
The film is therefore a misconception. A generous production, but that came a decade late.
Regarding the first myth, the film is merely inspired by reality, as is usual in cinema, particularly in Hollywood. Sometimes it takes real facts and characters, such as Captain Ledoux, Mrs. MacLeod, living in Java, erotic dances in Paris and Berlin, counter-espionage, the trial and death by firing squad, sometimes fantasy, in love with Karl (in fact her lover was a Russian officer in the service of the French, named Maslov, whom she rescued from enemy lines), the relationship between Karl and Ledoux, the sinister Fraulein Schragmuller and her terrorist conspiracy, and many other aspects of the argument. A recurring criticism in pseudo-biographical fiction.
But where the film most fails is in its attempt to use Kristel, the actress of Emmanuelle and erotic cinema diva of the previous decade, to embody that other erotic myth that is Mata Hari.
Erotic cinema was itself a myth. It never constituted a true genre, but a simple use of the progressive lightening of censorship to sell more and more nudity in the cinema, to the lustful public.
But, in 1985, nudity was already common in most films, even in Hollywood, and it no longer surprised anyone. It is used here in a more abundant dose than usual, but nothing particularly shocking or innovative, even for the time.
This leaves a good production, but focused on Kristel's sex and nudity scenes, which gives what is expected of her, but nothing more than that, because she was never a particularly gifted actress. Just a beautiful and elegant face and body, which cinema used to sell eroticism.
The film is therefore a misconception. A generous production, but that came a decade late.
US version of Mata Hari is cut omitting all of the sex scenes.International version is much more longer.DVD version released by MGM features the cut end edited version.Original version contain much more sex and nudity.I don't recommend that version.It is a soft core movie and buying the censored version of this silly film will be funny. I am doubtful that Lady Chatterley is also cut or not.I am not sure about it but i is also "R" rated.And it may also be cut.Fifth Musketeer is also cut omitting all of the nudity.For example uncut version contains much more nudity from Sylvia Kristel and Ursula Andress.
This film is a complete waste of time and celluloid. The actors (and I use that term lightly) wasted their time making this film. The people who went and saw this film (alas, I was one) wasted their time. Do you see a pattern here? This film STINKS, plain and simple. Don't waste your time on it. There are other sources of information about this famous woman. Utilize them instead of seeing this!
10Jimbo52
So what if some say this was "Awful"! The supporting cast under Miss Kristal is actually very good. Both the French and the Germans are believable. (What is it with lesbian German "fraulein doktors"?) :-) While the WWI battle scenes were rather poor for their lack of hundreds of extras, the details of what WAS shown is very commendable! Miss Kristal's best scene is where she stands at the edge of a trench and her coat drops to reveal for the first time her nurse's uniform (her costume for her spy duties). It doesn't sound dramatic, but the shot IS! The rest of the movie is just GORGEOUS with the European locations, set decoration and authentic props (including a steam locomotive!). It is a beautifully shot movie! You think you are back in 1916! If you enjoyed the location photography in THE BLUE MAX, you will also like MATA HARI! It may not be CITIZEN KANE but very watchable... many times, even!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe genealogy of the Mata Hari character was half-Dutch and half-Javanese. Actress Sylvia Kristel playing her was actually in real-life of Dutch lineage herself having come from Holland. Kristel was born in Utrecht in the Netherlands whereas the real-life Mata Hari was born in Leeuwarden, Holland.
- BlooperMata Hari (Sylvia Kristel) is shown dancing bare-breasted several times in the movie. In real life, Mata Hari never danced bare-breasted as she was self-conscious about having small breasts.
- Versioni alternativeUS DVD version is heavily cut. In the original international versions love scenes are much longer and much more graphic.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Mata Hari, mythe et réalité d'une espionne (1998)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Mata Hari?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 48min(108 min)
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti