Sangraal, la spada di fuoco

Phew, I watched this film last weekend and boy, it was pretty awful, but still, perhaps it was awful in a funny way. Last time I had seen this film was in the 80's and I thought it would be kind of nostalgia trip. I didn't expect anything great, but still it was a kind of disappointment! I remembered this film was pretty violent, but there wasn't even a hint of blood showing when the barbarians slewed one another. And their swords were pretty much like toys!! Fighting scenes were hilarious but not in a good way. Well, the final battle between two men was okay. Of course, acting was horrible, but I didn't expect anything else. But it was fun to watch and it took me back to my childhood for a hour and a half so I guess it is always positive thing.

But for those who seek no nostalgia, don't watch this!!

Seeking new land for his people a swordsman's wife is murdered by followers of the evil Goddess Rani. He vows vengeance upon the cult and journeys to the Ark of the Templars for a magic crossbow to exact his revenge.

Director Michele Massimo Tarantini's Sangraal The Sword of the Barbarian(s), Barbarian Master, la spada di fuoco (1982) is one of three swords and fantasy films to feature both lead Pietro Torrisi and also Sabrina Siani. The other two are Francesco Prosper's Gunan il guerriero, Gunan King Of The Barbarians or The Invincible Barbarian (1982) and Il trono di fuoco, The Throne of Fire (1983).

Here again, Torrisi looks uncannily just like live action He-Man as Sangraal. He does a more than competent job in the leads role, sadly he never gets a meatier script to test him. Blonde beauty Sabrina Siani's role is small but pivotal. Both blonde Margareta Rance as Lenna and Brunette Yvonne Fraschetti's Ati, daughter of a village leader fill the void. Xiomara Rodriguez is notable playing Rani, Goddess of Fire and Death, beautiful, vengeful and bloodthirsty who demands human sacrifice. Rani inexplicably needs to be topless, despite having a wonderful costume. Mario Novelli offers weight as evil warlord Nantuk. Sabrina Siani gets to give a wacky brief cameo performance as the temptress Goddess of Gold and Life in the final act.

Tarantini's basic story, Piero Regnoli's clunky screenplay with Ted Rusoff as dialogue supervisor features more of the same issues synonymous with the Italian produced sub-genre films. Editing, dubbing, sound design etc. That said, the costumes and props are well crafted, the locations especially the caves offer some credence to the production. The visual effects are bare minimum. Mostly smoke and mirrors. There's voiceover, horses, swords, nudity, skeletons snakes, severed limbs and sacrifice as Sangraal and Ati, joined by Hal Yamanouchi who plays an archer Li Wo Twan go about getting their revenge. Sandstorms and plenty of spear and sword action ensues as they tackle blind cave dwellers, morse code 'man monkeys' and other dangers.

Pasquale Fanetti's cinematography offers atmosphere. Alessandro Lucidi's editing is quite tight. Franco Campanino's dramatic music is fitting. Despite much of the poster art being misleading for this offering, those familiar with the genre will notice it's nothing new. To Tarantini's credit it's well put together compared to his Italian contemporaries of the sub-genre.

Ultimately, while the journey story isn't as fantasy filled as The Throne of Fire, it's one of the more rounded efforts of the Italian produced Conan, He-Man type swords and sorcery cash-ins.

The following review is an extract from the book "Sword and sorcery in cinema: Conan and other barbarians: A filmic guide", which is now available on Amazon.

"Sangraal is a mediocre but entertaining barbarian-exploitation that takes as its model the Conan of Milius. The script is quite dull and inconsistent; you can tell that it was written in a hurry and probably on the fly, without any intention of deepening the story (many subplots are started and then abandoned, for example the potentially interesting story of jealousy between Lenna and Aki is very much wasted).

Both the dialogues and the tiring voice-over of the narrator result in several unintentionally comical and even ridiculous moments: "The Forces of Evil only beget evil, but Good puts good before", the narrator solemnly explains. Another absurd and hilarious example is when Wang introduces himself to Aki and Sangraal. When the girl tells him her name, the Asian comments: "Aki, I like it; it's like sweet music" (!?). Wang's character, who with his "oriental wisdom" always has a "Chinese proverb" at hand, is a clear imitation of Conan the Barbarian's Subotai. Aki and formerly Lenna, brunette one and blonde the other, act as Sonja.

(...) Soon new challenges and missions appear: nothing less than finding "the Templar's Ark" (!??) - Let's not forget that this film is set in a magical and prehistoric time, long before our era.

Besides the armies of Nantuk, Sangraal and his comrades will have to face some "reptiloid" beings (it is never possible to see them clearly) in some underground tunnels and some primitive monkey-men (Cannibals?) in the thickness of the jungle.

In its Spanish version the film is called "La espada salvaje de Krotar" ("The savage sword of Krotar"), but this Krotar does not appear anywhere. He is only mentioned on one occasion very early on by the narrator (it is the king who expelled the people of Sangraal from their original lands). No doubt that misleading title was an idea of the Spanish distributors, who somehow wanted to associate the film with the popular comic book collection of "The savage sword of Conan".

Despite the film's many shortcomings, its soundtrack is more than acceptable; it has highly epic airs, no doubt inspired by the Carmina Burana."

I've seen yesterday on a local Tv this movie and i can say that it is superb. It's better not only than Ator flicks,but also than Conan curse. Sangraal has got a lot of violence,action,fights;it hasn't got the absurdities of "Blade Master"(The ultra-bow has more sense than the hang-glider) and has got a lot of superb BREASTS SHOTS! I can say that Tarantini has made the better finish for this type of flicks. With the exclusion of Red Sonja, the entire group of sword an sorcery movies say on the finish the hero leave the heroine alone,refusing their love with the stupidest phrases that you can hear in your life ; well,in these situation the hero in question saves the girl(who seems like Caroline Munro) from collapse of the cave ,bringing her to safety. Sangraal DOES NOT cover girl's breasts and begins to kiss with her! And finally the hero shares his new horse with her(probably to go to make love otherwhere,so the heroine remains with nude breasts)!! I'm serious but this finish is the best that i have never seen for this genre of movies!!Brilliant,brilliant,brilliant! There aren't the massacres that we can see on other flicks,and this can make the happiness of those who love action movies with many survivors. I'm sad only for the death of Hal Yamanouchi... But i give to SANGRAAL 10 stars out of 10!! It's indefinitely better also to Deathstalker!

This movie stunk. The English dubbing was horribly amateur, like some video company wanting a release in North America hired a bunch of high-school teachers to dub the film and did it in one try to save money at the recording studio. Ignoring the dubbing, the acting was completely off-key. Sometimes the characters looked like they were trying to get their lines over with after practicing a dozen times in front of the mirror, other times they were over-acting, it was the typical acting style you see in high-school dramas.

The choreography was a joke, not only can you tell it's totally fake with the lack blood and the bad acting, but what makes it funny is that they try to make it look real by moving the camera angles in such a way to hide the fact that they thrust the sword to the side of the opponent or to cover up the fakeness. The directing and photography is equally bad, the camera work is shaky, sloppy, and even out-of-focus at times.

The film shots were poorly set-up. They were at bad angles, frames, and positions. I'm sure the director knew this during editing, but they probably were operating on a miniscule budget, so they couldn't afford enough film and decent filming equipment. You can tell the budget is so small by the fact that they lacked enough decent props and backdrops, didn't have any special effects besides camera tricks, and had micro "villages" and settings that had the camera always close-up to hide this fact. Lastly, the music was completely cheesy, like it was made and composed for an electronic keyboard.

To sum things up, this movie is a completely forgettable, straight from film to VHS, watch-on-a-Sunday-afternoon-when-nothing-else-is-on-TV flick.