Nate tra le fiamme

There's a lot of talking about political ideas in here, but not a lot of movie. It's a mash up of short clips of big talk with amateurish acting and stock footage and poorly shot blips. There are some still valid ideas and messages, but it comes across more like a university thesis than anything that you'd want to watch. Important more than watchable.

Presented partially as a faux-documentary, Lizzie Borden's rough-around-the-edges but delightfully feminist 'Born In Flames (1983)' imagines a world in which America has become a so-called socialist democracy, ostensibly free of inequality and capitalist tendencies. However, this apparent utopia is far from as perfect as it may first seem; in fact, it isn't so much socialist as it is stagnant, still set up to cater to white, cishet, upper-class men who can use the concept of progress as a way to hinder any further examples of it. Everyone is considered equal by the government, and anyone advocating for their individual rights (or, indeed, the rights of any oppressed groups) are considered separatist. Yet, a unified front only works if it's always marching towards true equality, rather than stalling in a position of only partial equality and declaring it the best place to be, so it's natural for civil unrest and eventual revolution to rear its head. We can only spend so long being told to be grateful for the sacrifices and advancements made by the previous generation while that same generation washes its hands of responsibility and abandons those it supposedly fought so hard for. Something's got to give. It's interesting that the world this depicts isn't the right-wing dystopia most examples of alternate-future media aim to critique (and, indeed, we find ourselves in today), but is instead a world that's technically more fair and just than the one the film itself was made in. This unusual decision is used to keenly examine the idea that what's currently described as left-wing is often more centre-left, that there's always progress to be made and that we shouldn't rest when only some of the injustices of our society have been faced. The fight is never over, society is never perfect, progress is fluid and it needs to be allowed to evolve; standards must be pushed closer and closer to perfection, we mustn't be allowed to become complacent, "good enough" is never good enough. The flick is excellent at focusing on intersectional feminism, focusing on women of different races, classes and sexualities and showcasing how their different goals eventually align so that they can become a united front. It's also great at showing how unrest eventually boils over into revolution, constantly keeping you on the side of its protagonists even as they take up arms against a society that at first seems peaceful. As a film, it is unruly and amateurish in most of its aspects, and yet its framing device of sometimes being a documentary - or, at the very least, being comprised partially of radio broadcasts, televised news reports, and surveillance footage - allows this unprofessionalism (including what seems to be a mostly improvised screenplay, some slightly wonky acting, generally poor audio, and the occasional mistake such as a notably out-of-focus shot) to work in the affair's favour. After a few minutes (which, to be fair, are disorienting), you really start to believe the world which the piece presents, as well as the way in which it presents it. Even the scenes technically not meant to be documentary-style - as evidenced by their cutting format and the fact that no cameras would be allowed where they take place - feel like they're being captured by an in-universe cameraman, further lending the feature a palpable texture that compounds its excellently holistic and believable word building. Though the narrative is a little unwieldy, it replicates the sometimes necessary messiness of stories found during the process of making a non-fiction film, as well as the inherent disorganised beginnings of revolution and protest. Indeed, the feature replicates the way in which its initially disparate efforts of its various characters and groups eventually come together in unified action, becoming more and more focused as it heads towards its ballsy (and sadly rather prescient) conclusion. It's all just really invigorating, a vital and courageous picture with something to say and a novel way in which to say it. It's essentially a call to action, and it feels increasingly relevant today (frankly, the flawed social democracy it depicts feels much more comfortable than the system in which we currently find ourselves). It's a really good movie, if not for its technical and narrative execution than for its thematic content and underlying message. It's somewhat of a shock to the system, and it left me with a smile on my face due to how unashamed it is in presenting its own political ideology. It's brilliantly progressive, thunderously feminist, and arguably essential.

A film with almost mythic status as a feminist dystopian classic. Obviously the point is the politics but as a film its horrible. A cut-up of fake TV news coverage and documentary performance clearly improvised by a non-professional cast. Like finding yourself accidentally trapped in an argument you have no interest in. Fine if your burning interest is 1980's feminist agit-prop. Otherwise a complete waste of time.

Not only have I had the luck to see this movie, I had the privilege of receiving it from "Honey" one of the lead actors. This movie is so important as it brings to life the struggle of not only women who were active in the 70's, but that the issues they brought forth still continue. If one thinks we have come a long way in overcoming gender discrimination, then take a fresh look at this film. I particularly appreciate the feminist analysis that seems to be missing today from women's activism and politics. Every activist ought to view and take heed of this movies message. This film parallels much of the social climate women endure today. It reminds one of the radical ideas that fired the women's movement and how they might be reignited in todays world.It is timeless, yet carries the rawness of movies made in the 70's. I highly recommend this film.

A 1983 release of a future society where women stage a rebellion against the male dominated world they live in. More of an agitprop distillation of a dramatic 'what if' of a time to come w/the immediacy of a found footage documentary/social message screed, finds women fed up w/the status quo focusing on an outspoken gay, black woman who's a DJ who fills her airwaves w/the vitriol & anger (justified since we see men alternately trying to rape their counterparts or dismiss them from the workplace w/o a justified rationale) spurring a movement (the intended rape is thwarted by a phalanx of 10 speed riding Valkyries blowing whistles). When the DJ is arrested (the powers that be fear her power is becoming uncontrollable) she commits suicide in custody which sets the scene for a guerilla movement (replete w/automatic weapons) culminating in the destruction of the transmission antennas on top of the World Trade Center (eerily foreshadowing the '93 & 9/11 attacks). Yes, the film is rough w/all the odd ends kept in for flavor & texture but it touches on so many totems of protest (the metoo movement, Black Lives Matter, et al) one can forgive the unpolished sheen of the presentation. No big stars to remark about but genre fave, the late, great Ron Vawter shows up as a power broker out to derail the outspoken radio DJ, writer/actor Eric Bogosian has a quick scene as a TV tech & character actor Mark Boone Junior pops up as a perv accosting a woman on a train.