Van de koele meren des doods

This movie is really bad. It has it's moments but it's another Dutch B-movie. Explicit sex and bad audio. The audio is not cync with the movie and the actors speak like they are performing a play in front of a large crowd. This makes it unnatural to hear. The acting is a bit stiff and slow, it had a good beginning but moves towards complete boringness. The story is okay, it's of course from a book written in the beginning of 1900's. But still this movie isn't there, directing is boring and standard, acting is boring and stiff. The only thing that is pretty big for a Dutch movie are the sets with lots of extras running around and some nice photographic shots.

This movie needs a remake.

(1982) The Cool Lakes of Death/ Van de koele meren des doods (In Dutch with English subtitles) PSYCHOLOGICAL COSTUME DRAMA

Adapted from the novel by Frederik van Eeden, co-written and directed by Nouchka van Brakel that has Hedwig mistreated by relatives and her father after catching Typhlitis and it killing her own mother. He does this by making sure Hedwig would have a strict religious upbringing. From the time her mother died when she was a young child to the time she becomes an adult as she is played by Renée Soutendijk. Her full name believe it or not is "Hedwig Marga de Fontayne" after she was passed on to be raised from her father to relatives. And after she meets an lowly inspired artist, Johan Tereijde (Erik van 't Wout) who used to be an orphan who would often profess his love for her, she then chooses to wed a much more wealthier soldier aristocrat, Gerald Johannes Hendrikus Wijbrands (Adriaan Olree) we soon find out he is only married to her in principle and is also impotent. And during their loveless marriage, it is not long before she catches the attention of a pianist, Ritsaart (Derek de Lint) who often stays with Joop (Peter Faber) the artist Hedwig's first love interest was, Johan was a protege. And while Hedwig and Ritsaart were acting as husband and wife, she then made the mistake by opeing her big mouth about the forbidden affair to the worse gossiper even though she was still married to her first husband. And as a result cost him many piano concert gigs, for as a result of some unfortunate circumstance, lead her to be addicted to morphine. Can she pull herself out of it.

Released one year before the highly critically acclaimed "the Fourth Man" directed by Paul Verhoeven, the movie is okay except that we've seen this all before. The difference is that the time periods are different, and women in general were more repressed during 1870's. The ending of this movie is reminiscent to 1979 "My Brilliant Career" starring Judy Christie and Sam Neil which i felt is way more superior and inspiring.

I was really surprised to see this film had so many negative user reviews.

The Dutch are not particularly proud of their national cinema. If you'd ask a random Dutch person on the streets about his/her opinion about the country's films, the answer would probably be that only cheesy romcoms are produced there. Yet who is more familiar with Dutch cinema, knows this is nonsense. Among the wonderful Dutch directors are Paul Verhoeven, George Sluizer, Alex van Warmerdam, Bert Haanstra, Nanouk Leopold, and Marleen Gorris.

Also Nouchka van Brakel deserves more appreciation for her oeuvre, as it is surprising and sophisticated. She was the first female film director active in the Netherlands. The Cool Lakes of Death can be considered one of her finest.

The Cool Lakes of Death is a great film. It is based on a book from 1900 by the famous literary writer Frederik van Eeden, who was part of the naturalism movement which highly valued psychoanalysis.

It is a period drama set in the 19th-century Dutch upper class climate, yet its story has not become old. For this reason, both the film and the book have kept their quality.

This poetic and smartly edited film deals with female desire. Adolescence and passion clash with a restrained and protestant upbringing. Love and death chase each other. All these conflicting emotions are convincingly displayed in the performance of lead actress Renée Soutendijk. The scenery of the story at the start is the typicly flat and watery Dutch landscape, fields and forests, dunes and sea, and later the English countryside and Paris. Yet clarity gradually give way to the fogginess of a fever dream during this search for love and happiness.

It could be compared in its themes to Buñuel's Belle de jour, but then different in its formal and stylistic choices. Mubi called it a marriage between James Ivory and Lars von Trier. Certainly not boring, don't hesitate to give this film a chance!

Granted, I never read the book, so maybe it does the book a disservice. That said, I thought the acting was very good. I see that some people on here think the acting sucked, but the acting is outstanding. The dialog may have some weak scenes, but overall, I didn't find it unnatural or clumsy. I've seen bad examples of both ( just watch a lesser known 50's Hollywood film noir on YouTube... you'll see what I mean). The part where the pianist goes down on Hetty is unrealistic though; it takes way longer to bring a woman to orgasm that way. Just sayin'. Lol Anyway, at face value, I really thought it was worth watching. Also, beautiful photography.

"Ridiculous." That is about the only word that can be used to describe this wreck of a movie. The dialog is awful, the acting even more so. It is just completely and utterly unbelievable. Not one second could you take the main character seriously. Yes, she is quite disturbing in the book too, but the movie just completely ruins her character. The acting is so bad, it's almost hilarious, but unfortunately, this movie really isn't supposed to be a comedy.

This movie should not have been made. If you enjoyed the book by Frederik van Eeden, please do not harm yourself by watching this atrocity. That is, of course, unless you thoroughly enjoy movies with bad dialogue and bad acting.