Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAfter the original owner dies in a mental asylum, a man moves into an abandoned mansion with a sordid history. Meanwhile, a few locals conspire to steal a large amount of money, said to be h... Leggi tuttoAfter the original owner dies in a mental asylum, a man moves into an abandoned mansion with a sordid history. Meanwhile, a few locals conspire to steal a large amount of money, said to be hidden somewhere on the premises.After the original owner dies in a mental asylum, a man moves into an abandoned mansion with a sordid history. Meanwhile, a few locals conspire to steal a large amount of money, said to be hidden somewhere on the premises.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Bank Manager
- (as John Glyn Jones)
- Child on Hill
- (as Lysandra De-La-Haye)
Recensioni in evidenza
The main story idea isn't bad at all. But the way the story is handled technically is pretty bad. All the 'special effects' that show you Edward is experiencing bad things are more annoying and hard on the brain than anything else. The worst is at the 100 minute mark as well as those ultra-cheesy bats...they just look cheap and stupid. Overall, not a terrible movie but one that also isn't very good and is, surprisingly, a bit dull.
Despite some clichéd elements to the script (cynical townsfolk; noises reverberating around the house etc.) this is a film which clearly had a lot of potential on paper but it really doesn't get out of first gear until the last half hour when the central themes of the plot become clearer. The interweaving of past and present with Hardy interchanging between both Foster (present) and Marr (from the past) in certain sequences is hardly seamless and is patchily handled.
On reflection, the supporting cast don't really get that much to do considering that the 3 of them (played by Christopher Lee, Joan Collins and Herbert Lom) are all hell-bent on finding the money. Lee in particular seems to be more of peripheral figure than you would have expected.
Perhaps another thing to undermine it's psychologically thrilling aspirations is the script-writers' under-appreciation and under-usage of the story's more substantial "horror" or "thriller" elements occurring at night. It clearly dilutes the central thrills of the film.
Hardy does a decent job of portraying the gradual decline in sanity of his characterisation; and due to its little-known status this film might well be worth a look at, but to my mind, it could have been handled and executed a lot better.
I investigated systematically on the ghost genre and I can say this is one of the scariest ones. It surprised me, i didn't expected much from it, but it's very skillfully done, the way the flashbacks (or dimensional passages) start and stop are a masterwork.
It's a sort of a cheesy film but somehow, at the same time, is an excellent piece of cinema.
Here's the scariest scene of all my investigation: the one where our hero is knocking on the house's walls to find the place where the money is hidden, as he is tortured by the children voices, and they go "no, no ,no, no , no..."
You should see it if you didn't. And in the case you like it, try "The Haunting", "The Innocents" and "Picture of Jenny".
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe film was shot at an old asylum near Uxbridge called St Bernard's Hospital, which originally opened in 1831. Some of the original buildings are now part of the headquarters for the West London Mental Health NHS Trust.
- BlooperAround the 82 minute when Edward Foster kills Dr. Ian Manderville there is no blood trickling out of the victim's mouth in the wider shot then there is in the close up and it's gone again in the next wider shot.
- Citazioni
Dr. Ian Mandeville: [to his sister] You dirty, filthy little slut!
- ConnessioniReferenced in Best Life by Brooke ASMR: My HUGE Movie Collection!!!! (2015)
I più visti
- How long is Dark Places?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1