VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,9/10
22.373
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una piccola giornalista cerca di convincere la polizia di aver visto un omicidio nell'appartamento di fronte al suo.Una piccola giornalista cerca di convincere la polizia di aver visto un omicidio nell'appartamento di fronte al suo.Una piccola giornalista cerca di convincere la polizia di aver visto un omicidio nell'appartamento di fronte al suo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
William Finley
- Emil Breton
- (as Bill Finley)
Cathy Berry
- Lobster child
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Eddie Carmel
- Giant
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Olympia Dukakis
- Louise Wilanski
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Art Evans
- African Room Waiter
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Catherine Gaffigan
- Arlene
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Justine Johnston
- Elaine D'Anna
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
James Mapes
- Guard
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Laun Maurer
- Druggist
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Bob Melvin
- Extra
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Burt Richards
- Hospital Attendant
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
So, to begin, the twist ending isn't unpredictable in these days, but I don't blame Brian De Palma for that. Audiences in 1972 may very well have been wowed by it.
However, I still enjoyed this movie for it's homages to Hitchcock and the performances of Margot Kidder and Jennifer Salt. De Palma's obsession with voyeurism and split screen storytelling are also prominent here.
A great film to watch as a De Palma fan who seeks out the director's obsessions that he would use in better films like "Carrie" and "Blowout."
However, I still enjoyed this movie for it's homages to Hitchcock and the performances of Margot Kidder and Jennifer Salt. De Palma's obsession with voyeurism and split screen storytelling are also prominent here.
A great film to watch as a De Palma fan who seeks out the director's obsessions that he would use in better films like "Carrie" and "Blowout."
This one holds a nostalgic value for me, long before I saw the re-release of Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW. It was the *first* R-rated film I was ever able to get into (since I was like 13 at the time) and it scared the hell outta me. Add to it the frightening Bernard Hermann score and I wound up having nightmares for days afterwards.
I recently saw it again for the first time in 30 years, and it still holds up if you view it in the context of the time it was made.
We're talking the early 70s, folks. It's not Freddie or Jason or the dude with the weird mask in SCREAM. This is a deeper, twisted psychological film, sort of along the macabre lines of David Cronenberg, who I also happen to like.
Yeah, I suppose the slashing would be mild by today's standards, but this one was ahead of most all of 'em...
A good beginning for DePalma. 7 out of 10
I recently saw it again for the first time in 30 years, and it still holds up if you view it in the context of the time it was made.
We're talking the early 70s, folks. It's not Freddie or Jason or the dude with the weird mask in SCREAM. This is a deeper, twisted psychological film, sort of along the macabre lines of David Cronenberg, who I also happen to like.
Yeah, I suppose the slashing would be mild by today's standards, but this one was ahead of most all of 'em...
A good beginning for DePalma. 7 out of 10
Sisters benefits from a terrific set-up, a well delivered first hour, a marvelous Bernard Herrmann score, and De Palma's able use of a split screen. Unfortunately it can't carry itself through to the end, and soon collapses into a confusing, formulaic, and ridiculous ending that obviously tries to cover up the fact that, well, De Palma simply didn't know HOW to end the film. Nonetheless it is essential viewing for fans of shock cinema, psychological horror, or cod-Hitchcock fans.
SPOILER: A movie that doesn't really make a lick of sense when you think about it but that is so stylishly entertaining that you can't look away....yep, you guessed it, another Brian De Palma movie.
In this one Margot Kidder plays a woman whose Siamese twin died when they were separated and who now has a good twin/bad twin split personality. The good twin is a mousy thing with a French accent; the bad twin hacks people up with butcher knives. A busy body reporter (Jennifer Salt) who lives across the way witnesses one of the murders and tries to convince the police to investigate. When they don't take her claims seriously, she enlists the help of a private detective (Charles Durning). I'm not sure why she does so, because he does barely anything and she goes off on her own to investigate the crime herself. This leads her to a mental institution where.....oh, just see the wackadoodle thing yourself.
De Palma again tips his not so subtle hat to Hitchcock, and even hires frequent Hitchcock collaborator Bernard Herrmann to compose the film's terrific score. Themes of voyeurism (again, see Hitchcock) abound, but I'm not sure what De Palma is really using them to say, or indeed if he's trying to say anything at all. I just enjoyed watching his groovy use of split screens.
Grade: B+
In this one Margot Kidder plays a woman whose Siamese twin died when they were separated and who now has a good twin/bad twin split personality. The good twin is a mousy thing with a French accent; the bad twin hacks people up with butcher knives. A busy body reporter (Jennifer Salt) who lives across the way witnesses one of the murders and tries to convince the police to investigate. When they don't take her claims seriously, she enlists the help of a private detective (Charles Durning). I'm not sure why she does so, because he does barely anything and she goes off on her own to investigate the crime herself. This leads her to a mental institution where.....oh, just see the wackadoodle thing yourself.
De Palma again tips his not so subtle hat to Hitchcock, and even hires frequent Hitchcock collaborator Bernard Herrmann to compose the film's terrific score. Themes of voyeurism (again, see Hitchcock) abound, but I'm not sure what De Palma is really using them to say, or indeed if he's trying to say anything at all. I just enjoyed watching his groovy use of split screens.
Grade: B+
Although he had made a few films before,Sisters is perhaps the first film in the true De Palma style,you know,the obsession with voyeurism,the show-offy camera-work,the Hitchcock homages,the preferance for long,wordless dreamlike sequences interrupted by bloody violence,etc. Although De Palma HAS made films that are different,he seems to prefer making films that are like this. Sisters has all these elements,albeit sometimes in embryonic form.
The model here is obviously Psycho,and De Palma doesn't develop elements of that film as well as in the later Dressed To Kill,but it is interesting to watch. The director just about manages to have enough different elements,while riffing on obvious things from Psycho {such as a shocking murder a third of the way in,the basic plot} and even a bit of Rear Window. Things like split screen keep the interest despite a few dull bits,and towards the end De Palma is confident enough to resolve most of the film with some almost surreal dream/flashback sequences and an amusing pay off.
Accompanied by a sometimes TERRIFYING Bernard Herrmann score {nowhere near his best,but incredibly effective},and with plenty of humorous touches and an interesting feminist heroine,Sisters is nowhere near top De Palma,but it's a good dry run for classics like Dressed To Kill and Blow Out.
The model here is obviously Psycho,and De Palma doesn't develop elements of that film as well as in the later Dressed To Kill,but it is interesting to watch. The director just about manages to have enough different elements,while riffing on obvious things from Psycho {such as a shocking murder a third of the way in,the basic plot} and even a bit of Rear Window. Things like split screen keep the interest despite a few dull bits,and towards the end De Palma is confident enough to resolve most of the film with some almost surreal dream/flashback sequences and an amusing pay off.
Accompanied by a sometimes TERRIFYING Bernard Herrmann score {nowhere near his best,but incredibly effective},and with plenty of humorous touches and an interesting feminist heroine,Sisters is nowhere near top De Palma,but it's a good dry run for classics like Dressed To Kill and Blow Out.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBrian De Palma said the film's producer doubted anyone could be stuffed into a sofa bed, but the director recalls, "I shot it in one shot to show that you can in fact fit somebody into the sofa bed."
- BlooperAfter leaving Danielle's apartment, Grace and her mother exit that building, and Grace's mother suggests she should change clothes. Grace then reenters the lobby of the same building, to go up to her own apartment.
Although it may not be apparent, Grace and Danielle live in the same apartment complex, in the same building. The former "Alexander Hamilton" - now 36 Hamilton Avenue - in Staten Island is an H-shaped building, meaning apartments on its inner courts face each other across two courtyards. Therefore, Grace has a view across one of the courtyards directly into Danielle's windows. In addition, the elevators that characters take to and from both apartments are identical.
- Versioni alternativeFor the original 1973 UK cinema release cuts were made by the BBFC to edit the violent stabbing of Phillip Woode. All later releases were fully uncut.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Terrore in sala (1984)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Sisters?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Siamesas diabólicas
- Luoghi delle riprese
- 1757 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, New York, New York, Stati Uniti(formerly Four Corners Bakery)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 500.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 318.348 USD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti