Incoming Freshmen

Well, partly based on the other comments here I bought Brentwood's "Toga Party" DVD set, which includes this among other fine films for a bargain price. We should all be thankful that this movie has been preserved on DVD, regardless of quality. This appears to have been shot on videotape, then transferred to film. My jaw dropped in several parts of this movie as I could not believe that it had actually been made. But that's OK, because I was expecting a bad movie, I just had no idea how bad! Anyone who thinks they have seen the worst movie ever made owes it to themself to see this- it's definitely in the top 50. (Those who think "Gigli" was bad haven't seen anything!)

while being one of the "stars" of this film doesn't necessarily give me sage insight, i do know quite a bit of what was first there...and what ended up on the screen. i remember seeing the original cut of "incoming freshman" and being very pleased. it was funny, sexy, raunchy, all the main requirements of a drive-in film. you have to remember this was shot and released before all the rest...animal house, porky's, etc...so in its own way, this flick was truly ahead of its time. for whatever reasons, the film was given to the main distributors who editing out half the original film, and then edited in (should i say "shuffled?") THE most random scenes ever. the fat guy, the people with goat heads....what the heck was all that?! i'm sure it was put in for additional T&A, but it was so slowly paced, it caused anything going on prior to it to grind to a screeching and painful halt. but all in all, it's a fun memory for me...especially in that i'm able to say that the worst movie i've ever seen...i'm in!

The original edit of IF finally got a public showing on June 16, 2012 in Knoxville at the Relix Theatre, to an SRO crowd which included a couple of original cast members. The viewing was put on by the Tennessee Archive of Moving Image and Sound.

The original version is much better than what Cannon released, and the L.A. Times review from 1979 even mentioned that there seemed to be a disconnect between the two parts of the film.

Google "Knoxploitation" for a Metro Pulse story on the film and its production, which includes some fabulous stills shot during filming. A significant (or not) piece of the original was footage shot on US Highway 129 ("Deal's Gap" or "The Dragon" to tourists) from the back of a Ducati 750ss. This footage was included in the 2012 showing.

I know several people who worked on Incoming Freshman and recently had an opportunity to view a black and white work print of the original edit. Not only was the film re-edited, but additional scenes were shot by the distributor which accounts for the much of gratuitous sex and nudity. This was done, obviously, to make the film more marketable. The original film was intelligent, well conceived and and not at all badly done considering the production budget was less than $50,000. It many ways, it was a much better film than Animal House which is often credited with being THE ground breaking film that started a new genre of movies. It was never intended to be a "soft porn" film, an unfortunate and undeserved characterization. The film was shot on location in Knoxville Tennessee by two University of Tennessee Graduate students. Many of the scenes were shot on and around campus and on the Cumberland Avenue strip. It would be worthwhile to somehow release a "restored" version of this film. If I'm not mistaken one or both of the directors did go on to have careers in Hollywood. My good friend Tommy Gibbons worked on Incoming Freshman as an assistant camera operator and is a great source of information on the film.

I saw this film before it was sold for distribution and it was a very good film. I saw it after distribution at the theater and it was a completely different film. The film had been totally re-cut. A number of new scenes (the awful "southern" professor and the T and A) were added and the original film was pretty much lost. The storyline had no continuity due to the re-editing.

Though as one other reviewer mentioned, it is somewhat like Animal House (1978), but for a low-budget film, with "no-name" actors, the original (before re-edit) film was as good.