Summer City - Un'estate di fuoco

By sheer chance I found a movie titled "Sex, Blood and Rock&Roll" in a low price range of DVD's. It happened to be "Summer City" for sale under a new name. Curious I bought it. What a surprise ! Never saw a worse film than this one. The picture was exhausting to watch as over-exposed parts alternate with ... less over-exposed parts. The sound was incredibly bad, sometimes painfully sharp, mostly dull. The story : let's say, there was a story, and a good screenwriter or director probably would have been able to make something of it. Not this one. The only thing that seemed okay was Mel Gibson. What a mercy for each movie adept, he outlived this one. Conclusion, there is hope for any good actor, even after a bad start, just carry on.

Viewers won't miss much of the 'Summer City' ('Reign of Fear' for us Yanks) plot if they fastforward to the last forty minutes of this movie, as much of the movie is just filled with scenes that look like minute preparation for a string of Mentos commercials. The ample cheery scenery and happy 70s romp music seem very contradictory to the thriller mood. Add to the mix a indiscernable audio (not that the dialogue matters much, anyways) and slurred slang, it is a pretty boring movie.

Four friends--I'm not sure if they're supposed to be teenagers (none of them look younger than 25, but there's some scenes where they look like they're at a school dance)-- take a road trip to kick back, hit the pubs, and go surfing. Tension builds among the group between Sandy, a quiet young man who is angered by the obnoxious, womanizing Boo who seduces a teenaged girl while on their trip in one of his usual one night stands. Meanwhile, the girl's psychotic dad is also looking for Boo out of revenge for what he did to his daughter. Boo is in for a major wake up call. This is essentially the only substance of the film, a very simple story with no major drama or action, and even a let down ending.

Despite Mel Gibson being heralded as the star of the movie, his named marqueed in large letters, he is pretty inconsequential to the movie, and has a very minor role.

What could've been more like a version of "Deliverance," turned out to be a very boring movie that suffers from many faults as far as story and production values.

Whoever wrote the last review simply doesn't get the film.

While there's a happy-go-lucky veneer to everything, like the surfing, the sex and "larrikin" behaviour (wild young lads basically), that's mostly on the surface. The scenery is actually far from cheery... in fact, it is used on some occasions in ways that could have been straight out of "Twin Peaks" (especially the shots of the sun rising over the sea), if it wasn't for the climate. The menacing Bush (no pun intended) is a common feature in Aussie films, perhaps too much so.

As for "slurred slang", this is how Australians speak. Sorry! There is only one part where I couldn't make it out, which is a rude remark Boo makes to a girl in a greasy burger joint. If Americans really need subtitles to work out Australian dialogue, I suggest they go and study the language at night class.

Mel Gibson is indeed wrongly touted as the star of the film on the packaging, but he is by no means a "very minor role", in fact he is one of the group of four young men on whom the action is centred, and who witnesses (and keeps quiet about) certain things which are integral to the plot.

Also the last reviewer is wrong about it being set in the seventies - it was made then, but from the title sequence, and the music which gets played it's clearly meant to be the sixties! So, I reckon the film has its flaws, but it's an interesting piece - if only to see Mel in his "introducing" role.

Hi Chris Fraser, I was prompted to respond to your IMDb comments on Summer City by a festival executive who has selected the film to play in the Sanctuary Cove film festival. Firstly, the entire Summer City production (writing, producing and playing one of the characters) has some fond memories for me. Hey Chris, yes, it was tough, being on location without a budget, without a full professional crew, and sleeping on the floor of an RSL hall, but the input and energy from all those that were with us in Catherine Hill Bay was fantastic. They gave it their all, actors and crew members alike. Sure we would all like to have the knowledge and experience that one gleans over the years, but as an early attempt at producing a movie without much money, and without all the pros and cons was quite an achievement, and as one reader says, it's a little gem. And to me, that's a compliment. I'd like to suggest you maybe wrong on a couple of statements. Firstly, the film wasn't strung together by the producer and the editor. We worked our backsides off for ten months trying to cut a film together without the coverage we would have liked. I didn't blame you for that, you did the best you could under the circumstances. Nor did the actors refuse to continue working on the project. You may remember, you instigated a meeting during the editing process, and brought John Jarrat along, but it didn't go anywhere when I spelt out the costs to date. Soon after, I picked Mel Gibson up from NIDA personally, and shot an opening scene of he (Scollop)and I(Robbie)walking down the street discussing Sandys(John Jarrat's)forthcoming engagement and the upcoming weekend away. (It wasn't used as we had a sound problem)There wasn't any stock footage other than the opening credit sequence. Klaus Jaritz shot the second unit material, long after you had gone. Yes. There were some great add lib moments, all credit to you and the actors, and there were scenes that were really memorable. (Thanks for that.) Check out the new release DVD I'm sure some of the things you suggested that went on when the cameras weren't rolling are in the 'Behind The Scenes' 30 minute documentary, that accompanies the film. Surfs up. P.A

With all due respect to the previous reviewer, Mel Gibson is not the star of this 1977 Australian drama, sometimes known as "Coast of Terror." He is, however, very good in his film debut as Scollop, one of four young men on a weekend jaunt set sometime during the early 60's, judging by all the long surfboards and rock music of the era. The real stars are John Jarrat as Sandy, a quiet, introspective young man who is shortly to be married, and Steve Bisley as Boo, whose only focus in life seems to be having a good time, including a brief fling with Sandy's intended. It is the contrast of these two characters and the events that lead to the violent, tragic climax that make the film worth a view.

This is a very low budget film that suffers quite a bit from poor sound recording and inconsistent editing. The poor sound, coupled with very thick Australian accents will prompt American viewers to ask "What did he say?" throughout the film. On the plus side, the acting is very good for a low budget film and the Australian locales really add authenticity.

In addition to Gibson, this was also Bisley's film debut. They would re-team for George Miller's first "Mad Max" film as fellow police officers. In the United States, their Australian accents were dubbed into "American."