Howard Hughes è stato un celebre aviatore, un ingegnere, un industriale, un produttore e regista cinematografico, un playboy, un eccentrico ed una delle persone più ricche del mondo.Howard Hughes è stato un celebre aviatore, un ingegnere, un industriale, un produttore e regista cinematografico, un playboy, un eccentrico ed una delle persone più ricche del mondo.Howard Hughes è stato un celebre aviatore, un ingegnere, un industriale, un produttore e regista cinematografico, un playboy, un eccentrico ed una delle persone più ricche del mondo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Vincitore di 1 Primetime Emmy
- 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale
Lee de Broux
- Jimmy
- (as Lee Jones-de Broux)
Denise Galik
- Shirley Whitehead
- (as Denise Gal)
Tannis G. Montgomery
- Mrs. Hughes
- (as Tannis Montgomery)
Recensioni in evidenza
There's just no comparison between this excellent made-for-TV movie and the awful soap opera Aviator. And talk about casting... HRH was a long, tall (over 6') Texan with a southern drawl. So who does Scorsese pick? A short, blond, blue-eyed kid - di Caprio. On the other hand, Tommy Lee Jones was right on. Looked like Hughes, sounded like Hughes, etc, etc. Oh, and Ed Flanders was MUCH more believable in the role of Noah Dietrich than John Reilly.
Both NetFlix and Blockbuster.com have it. If you prefer a chic flick with lots of romance and stories that focus about the women in his life, then Aviator wins. But if you really want to know about HRH, the Las Vegas acquisitions, the Glomar Explorer, etc, then The Amazing Howard Hughes is a far better choice.
Both NetFlix and Blockbuster.com have it. If you prefer a chic flick with lots of romance and stories that focus about the women in his life, then Aviator wins. But if you really want to know about HRH, the Las Vegas acquisitions, the Glomar Explorer, etc, then The Amazing Howard Hughes is a far better choice.
This film has been and will continue to be compared to "The Aviator" - a film that frankly bored me. "The Amazing Howard Hughes" looked and felt real because it focused upon Hughes as a real life flesh and blood man and used few if any cinematic tricks. Tommy Lee Jones made a very credible Howard Hughes from his physique down to his accent.
I am interested by the actual business dealings of Hughes and those around him rather than his marriages and affairs. Afterall, there have been many playboy millionaires in America's history but only one Howard Hughes. It wasn't the romances that made Hughes particularly interesting and this film didn't focus on them in the way "The Aviator" did. For me, this was a positive.
I am interested by the actual business dealings of Hughes and those around him rather than his marriages and affairs. Afterall, there have been many playboy millionaires in America's history but only one Howard Hughes. It wasn't the romances that made Hughes particularly interesting and this film didn't focus on them in the way "The Aviator" did. For me, this was a positive.
Found this movie again - buried in my Dvd collection.
Tommy Lee was just superb. As much as any bio drama can, this movie portrays the man, H. R. Hughes pretty well. I won't even compare the other bio-drama so many here mention because they're simply two completely different movies movies made in two completely different eras.
Why must people's opinions be so rooted in comparing same-subject movies?
This is a strong and unique movie.
The character is in fact developed enough psychologically that we fully understand his drive; a common enough story; never able to please his father, Howard drives himself to utter perfection in everything. Sets the highest goals, and achieves them. Unfortunately, the cost of that is one's sanity.
As Albert Einstein said, 'the only difference between genius and insanity is that genius has its limits.' I believe his OCD behaviours were with him all his life, easier to dismiss or call 'ecentric' and somewhat more controllable in his youth, but obviously, culminated into total loss of control because the mind (& body following along) can only control just so much. It is utterly overwhelming to realize one is losing control, or even if they are in denial of that, the fallout exists - either way they will suffer the collateral damage - and then the mind turns on itself - to control what it thinks is controllable. The same paradoxical idea, for example bulemics exhibit - controlling their weight in destructive ways - is about feeling in control, yet it's out of control behaviour.
For Howard, it was germs. It was trying to grasp at anything he thought he had left in the realm of control, like the care of his own body.
Yet, the controller is denying the obvious out of control results, obsessively repeating the steps to give himself the illusion of control.
Hughes exhibited quite paradoxical behaviour throughout his life. This, combined with his genius, and as portrayed here, rather inappropriate social behaviours, leads me to strongly believe he was on the spectrum for Aspergers.
Just a fascinating & brilliant man. Regardless of his tragic end.
Tommy Lee was just superb. As much as any bio drama can, this movie portrays the man, H. R. Hughes pretty well. I won't even compare the other bio-drama so many here mention because they're simply two completely different movies movies made in two completely different eras.
Why must people's opinions be so rooted in comparing same-subject movies?
This is a strong and unique movie.
The character is in fact developed enough psychologically that we fully understand his drive; a common enough story; never able to please his father, Howard drives himself to utter perfection in everything. Sets the highest goals, and achieves them. Unfortunately, the cost of that is one's sanity.
As Albert Einstein said, 'the only difference between genius and insanity is that genius has its limits.' I believe his OCD behaviours were with him all his life, easier to dismiss or call 'ecentric' and somewhat more controllable in his youth, but obviously, culminated into total loss of control because the mind (& body following along) can only control just so much. It is utterly overwhelming to realize one is losing control, or even if they are in denial of that, the fallout exists - either way they will suffer the collateral damage - and then the mind turns on itself - to control what it thinks is controllable. The same paradoxical idea, for example bulemics exhibit - controlling their weight in destructive ways - is about feeling in control, yet it's out of control behaviour.
For Howard, it was germs. It was trying to grasp at anything he thought he had left in the realm of control, like the care of his own body.
Yet, the controller is denying the obvious out of control results, obsessively repeating the steps to give himself the illusion of control.
Hughes exhibited quite paradoxical behaviour throughout his life. This, combined with his genius, and as portrayed here, rather inappropriate social behaviours, leads me to strongly believe he was on the spectrum for Aspergers.
Just a fascinating & brilliant man. Regardless of his tragic end.
This film is outstanding on all levels covered all of Hughes' life which is surprising for a t.v. movie.
Don't ever look for any movie t.v. or not to tell the full story of anyones life.This film was done at a time when there was actually(URGH)truth and balance in media.
I saw this movie with the limited opinion that he was just some nut case and came away with the opinion that he was an extraordinary complicated man who let his ego get the better of him.
There is a message in this film for all of us and that is not to ignore your problems or difficulties.
I feel sorry for younger people who will never get the chance to see a biopic that would tell a persons story as accurately as they could.
At least not one that was made in this country and certainly not one that was done by Americans.
Don't ever look for any movie t.v. or not to tell the full story of anyones life.This film was done at a time when there was actually(URGH)truth and balance in media.
I saw this movie with the limited opinion that he was just some nut case and came away with the opinion that he was an extraordinary complicated man who let his ego get the better of him.
There is a message in this film for all of us and that is not to ignore your problems or difficulties.
I feel sorry for younger people who will never get the chance to see a biopic that would tell a persons story as accurately as they could.
At least not one that was made in this country and certainly not one that was done by Americans.
Tommy Lee Jones is the quintessential Howard Hughes,with mannerisms, voice,and he looks just like Howard Hughes (Check out old news reels) His acting puts the frosting on the cake. In the same regard Ed Flanders portrayal of Noah Dietrich, is right on the money as well. I also like the "Aviator" (2004) Martin Scorsese's ,interpretation is also great;but Tommy Lee Jones (for me) became Howard Hughes,through 1924-1976. This film deserves to be remastered for sound/video, but for now I'm quite satisfied with my DVD version of this 1977 Mini Series Classic!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizTommy Lee Jones bagged the lead role playing Howard Hughes for US $25,000 when Warren Beatty turned down a US $1 million offer. Beatty later produced and starred in his own Howard Hughes biopic picture which was L'eccezione alla regola (2016).
- BlooperWhat is supposed to be the Hughes XF-11 aircraft is actually a WWII P-38 fighter (however, this is understandable since the real XF-11 would have been unavailable for the movie).
- Citazioni
Howard Hughes: I'll tell you the truth, Cruickshank, most people just bore me and I don't want to get involved with them.
- Curiosità sui creditiAfter the closing credits there is a short News Of The Day newsreel about the Spruce Goose including footage of the real Howard Hughes
- Versioni alternativeThis production, according to 'The Biopic Story' website, '' . . . was originally a mini-series, screening over two nights with a running time of three hours and fifteen minutes. The version more readily available nowadays has a running time of less than two hours . . . with over 75 mins cut''.
- ConnessioniFeatures La caduta delle aquile (1966)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Howard: The Amazing Mr. Hughes
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Amazing Howard Hughes (1977) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi