VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
569
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen three coeds discover that the campus Casanova is dating them all at once, they lock him up in an attic and take turns having sex with him... to drain the stud of his potency.When three coeds discover that the campus Casanova is dating them all at once, they lock him up in an attic and take turns having sex with him... to drain the stud of his potency.When three coeds discover that the campus Casanova is dating them all at once, they lock him up in an attic and take turns having sex with him... to drain the stud of his potency.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Tom Ahearne
- Wilfred
- (as Thomas F. Ahearne)
Elizabeth Tanner
- Secretary to the Dean
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
American International was a hot studio in the 1960s and it was NOT because it was producing quality films! Beach movies, LSD and hippie movies were quite popular with the small studio and they were very successful. Shot with rather small budgets, their films kept raking in the bucks during this era because their content appealed to younger, hipper viewers. Artistic masterpieces? Hardly....but they did have their own odd sort of appeal.
In many ways, "Three in the Attic" is exactly the sort of movie I expected from American International. It is jam-packed with sexual innuendo and is the sort of film that would have been banned only a decade earlier. But, despite this, it's not exactly a typical exploitation or trashy film. The acting and script are a bit of a surprise as they really did NOT suck!
This film is about Paxton Quigley (Christopher Jones) and why he was given this odd name is beyond me. When the film begins, you learn that he's being held prisoner in an attic and then the film jumps back so you can learn how and why he's in this situation. It seems that he and a young lady were in love....but Paxton couldn't resist temptation. When two other women practically throw themselves at him, he gives in to the sexual revolution and juggles all three women...having a LOT of sex and good times. However, eventually the three discover his dalliances and decide to teach him a less...to practically screw him to death in this attic prison!
Despite the salaciousness of the plot and the steamy story, the film actually has some interesting things to say about this sexual revolution. I am not saying it's exactly a deep film...but it is weird and worth seeing...especially when you look at it as an interesting snapshot of an unusual time. As for the ending, it really didn't make much sense...but it still was quite interesting!
In many ways, "Three in the Attic" is exactly the sort of movie I expected from American International. It is jam-packed with sexual innuendo and is the sort of film that would have been banned only a decade earlier. But, despite this, it's not exactly a typical exploitation or trashy film. The acting and script are a bit of a surprise as they really did NOT suck!
This film is about Paxton Quigley (Christopher Jones) and why he was given this odd name is beyond me. When the film begins, you learn that he's being held prisoner in an attic and then the film jumps back so you can learn how and why he's in this situation. It seems that he and a young lady were in love....but Paxton couldn't resist temptation. When two other women practically throw themselves at him, he gives in to the sexual revolution and juggles all three women...having a LOT of sex and good times. However, eventually the three discover his dalliances and decide to teach him a less...to practically screw him to death in this attic prison!
Despite the salaciousness of the plot and the steamy story, the film actually has some interesting things to say about this sexual revolution. I am not saying it's exactly a deep film...but it is weird and worth seeing...especially when you look at it as an interesting snapshot of an unusual time. As for the ending, it really didn't make much sense...but it still was quite interesting!
I was about 15 years old when I saw this movie, in 1969, I think. I never saw it again but I never got it off my mind even until today. Why? because It was very funny and it was just a hilarious story and well thought out.
It tells a story where this guy has a number of girlfriends, they all found out he was cheating and decided to teach him a lesson that he couldn't refuse. Lots of laughter and hurting sides and you would keep wanting more and more.
It would still do well even today and would fit right in with today's society. I would love to see it again. It really was ahead of it's time.
It tells a story where this guy has a number of girlfriends, they all found out he was cheating and decided to teach him a lesson that he couldn't refuse. Lots of laughter and hurting sides and you would keep wanting more and more.
It would still do well even today and would fit right in with today's society. I would love to see it again. It really was ahead of it's time.
It would seem to be a real shame most of those involved, from writer
Stephen Yada to Christopher Jones, never really got to do much else.
Because this uneven, smart, well acted satire is way ahead of it's time;
and still surprises. The title gimmick, which was used to advertise the movie, is really one
of the weaker sections of the film, which looks at the battle of the
sexes in a way that really does mirror it's time, while treating it's
characters with humor and affection. If you can get a copy, it's well
worth going out of your way to see. Only the mediocre pop score does not
hold up well.
Stephen Yada to Christopher Jones, never really got to do much else.
Because this uneven, smart, well acted satire is way ahead of it's time;
and still surprises. The title gimmick, which was used to advertise the movie, is really one
of the weaker sections of the film, which looks at the battle of the
sexes in a way that really does mirror it's time, while treating it's
characters with humor and affection. If you can get a copy, it's well
worth going out of your way to see. Only the mediocre pop score does not
hold up well.
It is a shame that older small movies (low budget, small box office, "B" movies) rarely climb out of the "attic" and back into availability as VHS or DVD selections.
This was a classic "teen flick" cheaply produced to maximize profit, but it was a bit of a surprise hit. It even produced a sequel.
The music by Chad Stuart show his startling creativity and promise of a career that never materialized.
I only wish it were readily available.
This was a classic "teen flick" cheaply produced to maximize profit, but it was a bit of a surprise hit. It even produced a sequel.
The music by Chad Stuart show his startling creativity and promise of a career that never materialized.
I only wish it were readily available.
I had to give this a high rating. I ran the 16mm theater while stationed at Cape Romanzof Alaska. We were in the bottom of a volcano on the Bering Sea. My previous duty assignment was at North Truro AFS on Cape Cod. The scenes showing Provincetown, MA. made me feel so great! Not quite like being home again, but it sure was nice to see.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn 1969, American International Pictures distributed this film on a double bill with Woody Allen's Che fai, rubi? (1966).
- BlooperThe length of Paxton's hair is constantly changing, especially in the scenes in the attic.
- Citazioni
Dean Nazarin: Non-swimmers should never leap bare-assed into the sea of love. My dear, the sea of love is full of squid!
- Curiosità sui creditiThe end credits feature a cartoon featuring an older married couple bickering about the movie they just watched -- i.e. the movie that preceded it!
- ConnessioniFeatured in Dusk to Dawn Drive-In Trash-o-Rama Show Vol. 7 (2002)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Three in the Attic?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti