Un architetto americano, stabilitosi a Venezia con la moglie dopo la morte accidentale della loro bambina, inizia a dubitare della propria sanità mentale quando inizia ad avere inquietanti e... Leggi tuttoUn architetto americano, stabilitosi a Venezia con la moglie dopo la morte accidentale della loro bambina, inizia a dubitare della propria sanità mentale quando inizia ad avere inquietanti e frammentarie premonizioni, che coincidono con una serie di delitti in città.Un architetto americano, stabilitosi a Venezia con la moglie dopo la morte accidentale della loro bambina, inizia a dubitare della propria sanità mentale quando inizia ad avere inquietanti e frammentarie premonizioni, che coincidono con una serie di delitti in città.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Ha vinto 1 BAFTA Award
- 2 vittorie e 9 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
First of it is *not* a candidate for greatest horror film ever, though the Times would have you believe otherwise. What it *is* though is a highly confusing yet thought-provoking story which covers grief and dillusion in equal measure.
Donald Sutherland plays John Baxter, who's married to Laura, who lose a child in an accident and find their worlds turned upside-down as a result. However, thereafter the story is set in Venice where John's working on a job and Laura's accompanied him there, and where things start to get disturbing for the couple as events begin to focus on their dead daughter and paranormal themes emerge.
It *is* a strange tale, and ultimately what you get out of it is entirely up to you. It is probably from this film that the likes of David Lynch started to derive inspiration.
Overall, good, if intrinsically confusing.
Nicolas Roeg does an excellent job in filming scenes of creepy and eerie impact. Donald Sutherland gives a extraordinary performance as the clairvoyant but disbeliever, John Baxter. The film's most controversial sequence is the shocking sex scene with Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie. What's shocking about this one scene is the realistic feel of the act. There are some who believe to this day that the sex scene was not acted but real. The Sutherland-Christie sex scene is done with the same editing technique as The Man Who Fell to Earth(1976).
Don't Look Now(1973) was The Sixth Sense(1999) of its era. One film that sports the same idea about fate is David Croenberg's The Dead Zone(1983). Julie Christie is just brilliant as Laura Baxter. Shares the same gloomy landscape as the director's later film, The Man Who Fell to Earth(1976). The climax of Don't Look Now(1973) was a gloomy and shocking sequence to watch. Don't Look Now(1973) is in the tradition of films such as Last Year at Marienbad(1960).
This is a slow burn. It's an artsy gothic horror. There are two great actors here. John is flailing around. I notice it from his near accident at the church. He's contorting himself out of shape to grab the rope. The movie feels like it's contorting itself out of shape. It's uncomfortably eerie. The movie, Venice itself, and the characters are all oddly unreal. There is an uncontrolled feel to their actions. It's a slow descend into a kind of madness.
Don't Look Now is often held as an example of how a movie adaptation can be refreshingly different from the source material.
Director Nicolas Roeg was not a traditional director preferring to push the envelope. The movie is known making Venice look Gothic and menacing. As well as the tender lovemaking scene between Julie Christie and Donald Sutherland. It was regarded as rather graphic for the time.
Laura Baxter (Christie) and John Baxter (Donald Sutherland) are devastated when their daughter Christine accidentally drowns in a pond outside their home. She was wearing a shiny plastic red raincoat at the time.
John had some kind of second sight that she was in danger but was too late to save her.
Some time later, with their other son in Boarding school. Laura and John are in Venice. He is involved in a project to restore a church.
Laura has a chance encounter with two sisters, Heather and Wendy. Heather is blind but has psychic abilities. One of them is that Christine is communicating with her and that John might be in danger is they stay in Venice.
John dismisses the sisters but this is a Venice where a serial killer is on the loose. John is also having visions of someone in a red cape.
What begins as a film about family loss and grieving. It slowly but suddenly morphs into a psychic supernatural thriller that leans into horror.
You sense that John might be going mad as he has visions of Laura when he knows she has left Venice for England. He also dismisses his own supernatural abilities, his own sense that bad luck seems to follow him.
There is a subplot that Roeg introduces where John along with others could be the suspected killer. The ending is creepy and both horrific.
Apparently Du Maurier liked the adaptation of this story. Roeg introduces a lot of symbolism in the film. Hence why when the figure in the red cape turns around it is startling.
As a footnote when Joel Schumacher made Flatliners. The Kiefer Sutherland character had visions of a figure in red.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe scene set in the church where Laura lights a candle for Christine was mostly improvised. Originally intended to show the gulf between John's and Laura's mental states-John's denial and Laura's inability to let go-the script included two pages of dialogue to illustrate John's unease at Laura's marked display of grief. After a break in filming to allow the crew to set up the equipment, Donald Sutherland returned to the set and commented that he did not like the church, to which Julie Christie retorted that he was being "silly," and the church was "beautiful." Nicolas Roeg felt that the exchange was more true to life in terms of what the characters would actually say to each other, and that the scripted version was "overwritten," so opted to ditch the scripted dialogue and included the real-life exchange instead.
- BlooperWhen Laura leaves the hotel near the end to pursue John, she is wearing boots but is barelegged. Later in the chase as she scrambles over a boat, she is wearing the same boots but is now also wearing dark colored stockings/tights.
- Citazioni
John Baxter: What are you reading?
Laura Baxter: I was just trying to find the answer to a question Christine was asking me: if the world's round, why is a frozen lake flat?
John Baxter: Huh. That's a good question.
Laura Baxter: [flipping through a book] Ah-ha. "Lake Ontario curves more than 3 degrees from its eastern most shore to its western most shore." So, frozen water really isn't flat!
John Baxter: Nothing is what it seems.
- Versioni alternativeThe region 1 DVD released by Paramount contains the full love scene which was slightly trimmed for an "R" rating in the U.S.
- ConnessioniEdited into Spisok korabley (2008)
I più visti
- How long is Don't Look Now?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Venecia rojo shocking
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Chiesa di San Nicolo dei Mendicoli, Campo San Nicolo, Dorsoduro, Venezia, Italia(Church Baxter is restoring)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.500.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 116.094 USD