VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
3229
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una coppia invita un conte dall'Ungheria a condurre una seduta spiritica, ignaro di essere un vampiro.Una coppia invita un conte dall'Ungheria a condurre una seduta spiritica, ignaro di essere un vampiro.Una coppia invita un conte dall'Ungheria a condurre una seduta spiritica, ignaro di essere un vampiro.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Donna Anderson
- Donna
- (as Donna Anders)
Judy Lang
- Erica Landers
- (as Judith Lang)
George Macready
- Narration
- (voce)
Erica Macready
- Babette - the nurse
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Mark Tapscott
- Peter (seance guest)
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Stella Thomas
- Vampire Woman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
I was a bit surprised by this rather low budget 1970s incarnation of vampire films. That's because around this same time period, vampire films were getting a bit stale and silly--with too many Hammer Dracula films (the franchise was getting weaker due to so many sequels) as well as dumb films like OLD Dracula and the Blacula films (which weren't terrible, but they sure were silly). However, despite my fear that this would be another stale film, this one turned out to be better than average and well worth a look. While only a nut would compare this to the greatness of Dracula or NOSFERATU, it still is a decent example of the franchise.
Before talking about the plot, there was something odd I noticed and that was how sexy the film was and it looked, at times, like it was a soft-core porno movie. However, again and again when it looked like it was going that direction, the movie abruptly changed direction--sometimes as if scenes were edited out to make this a film for general viewing. I checked IMDb for this and was not at all surprised to find that this was indeed the case. For example, a lesbian sex scene seemed about to occur--then the scene just ended. In another case, a woman was wearing a very revealing nightgown and began a very torrid scene with Iorga (there were two spellings in the film) and this just ended as well. There was also a very gratuitous scene involving a couple making love in a van for absolutely no reason--but again, with creative editing you really didn't see anything! As a result, the film is still quite sexy--but also one you could probably still let your teens watch.
Iorga/Yorga lives in the Los Angeles area in a house that looks more like a castle than a house. Even in crazy L.A., this house was definitely out of place! The film begins with his having a séance with three couples and it's soon apparent that the Count has magical hypnotic powers. Soon, it also becomes rather obvious that the Count is a heterosexual vampire--with strong desires for the three women but only a desire to kill off the men.
Many elements are taken from Dracula--even including a Dr. Helsing-like character. Despite the familiarity, the decent acting and nice update of the old tale make this worth a look. Plus the performance by the guy playing the Count was pretty cool.
Before talking about the plot, there was something odd I noticed and that was how sexy the film was and it looked, at times, like it was a soft-core porno movie. However, again and again when it looked like it was going that direction, the movie abruptly changed direction--sometimes as if scenes were edited out to make this a film for general viewing. I checked IMDb for this and was not at all surprised to find that this was indeed the case. For example, a lesbian sex scene seemed about to occur--then the scene just ended. In another case, a woman was wearing a very revealing nightgown and began a very torrid scene with Iorga (there were two spellings in the film) and this just ended as well. There was also a very gratuitous scene involving a couple making love in a van for absolutely no reason--but again, with creative editing you really didn't see anything! As a result, the film is still quite sexy--but also one you could probably still let your teens watch.
Iorga/Yorga lives in the Los Angeles area in a house that looks more like a castle than a house. Even in crazy L.A., this house was definitely out of place! The film begins with his having a séance with three couples and it's soon apparent that the Count has magical hypnotic powers. Soon, it also becomes rather obvious that the Count is a heterosexual vampire--with strong desires for the three women but only a desire to kill off the men.
Many elements are taken from Dracula--even including a Dr. Helsing-like character. Despite the familiarity, the decent acting and nice update of the old tale make this worth a look. Plus the performance by the guy playing the Count was pretty cool.
In this alternate take on the Dracula story, the titular count (from Bulgaria) holds a seance to contact the mother of young Donna. Donna's mom died of some kind of anemia, which of course fits in with the movie's theme. The seance doesn't go as planned, but Yorga is able to implant some post-hypnotic control on poor Donna, and soon enough bodies are piling up as Donna and her friends try to figure out what's what. There's even a henchman who's (apparently) a werewolf! But aside from the present-day (well, 1970) atmosphere and setting, this is a movie useful only as a cult hit. Tired of the same old vampires? Try Count Yorga, sort of a Diet Dracula. As with many genre pics of the period, the acting and direction are pretty nondescript, and the whole thing looks like it was filmed through a screen door.
1970's "The Loves of Count Iorga, Vampire" was intended as the second collaboration between screenwriter/director Bob Kelljan and producer Michael Macready, after their little seen soft porn incest obscurity "Flesh of My Flesh" (neither had made any impact as television actors). Robert Quarry agreed to star only if it were done as a straight horror film minus the nudie trappings, as a European vampire recently transplanted from Bulgaria to modern day Los Angeles, residing on a sprawling hilltop estate complete with dungeon, inspired not by Christopher Lee but Jonathan Frid, whose Barnabas Collins was still seen daily on the Dan Curtis soap DARK SHADOWS. He establishes Yorga right away in the opening scene, conducting a seance for Donna (Donna Anders) that no one seems to take seriously, to communicate with her recently deceased mother (Marsha Jordan), who, not surprisingly, already resides in his abode as a vampire bride. At all times cool, calm and collected, Yorga receives a ride home in the van owned by Paul (Michael Murphy) and Erica (Judith Lang), whose attempt to leave is stymied by an unexpected patch of mud, revealing Yorga's mastery of the elements to maintain a grip on potential victims. An untimely lovemaking session is rudely interrupted by the hungry Count, an amnesiac Erica decidedly withdrawn and in need of a blood transfusion done by Dr. Jim Hayes (Roger Perry), particularly after devouring half a kitten in her sudden bloodlust. By night, she is spirited away following an erotic coupling with Yorga, Paul foolishly rushing off to find her as Dr. Hayes, Donna, and her fiancee Michael (producer Macready) all pay an unannounced call on an initially hospitable but increasingly agitated host. This is easily the picture's best scene, Quarry frequently amused and utterly defiant in his responses to the inane questions posed by his nemeses, impeccably dressed in blood red robes, before taking his leave before the sun rises. The final two reels find our last remaining heroes entering the domain of the undead after dark, without a concrete plan of action, and little hope to succeed. Quarry would self finance his own "Guru Vampire," later picked up for release by AIP as "Deathmaster" (a name taken from this film's posters) before taking on the sequel "The Return of Count Yorga," which benefits from a bigger budget, larger cast, better script, and an even deeper connection to Barnabas Collins.
Count Yorga (Robert Quarry), a vampire, comes from Bulgaria to 1970 Los Angeles and starts making a coven of beautiful female vampires. Will their boyfriends be able to stop him?
This was a huge hit in 1970 because it was the first modern vampire film. Up until then all vampire films had been set in Europe in the 1800s or early 1900s. This was the first vampire film set in modern day. Still it isn't a great film. It was originally shot with soft core sex scenes which were (pretty obviously) edited out and it was turned into a sleazy PG rated film. It was made on a very low budget (it shows) and suffers from some horrible 1970s fashions and dialogue. Also the makeup on the female vampires is pretty poor. Still this isn't a total disaster either.
The script is actually pretty intelligent considering this was a fairly rushed production. The acting is good--especially by Quarry who makes an imposing vampire. Very subtle performance but he handles the violent scenes quite well too. It moves at a fairly quick pace and has a great bloody climax--pretty extreme for a PG film. This won't impress audiences like it did in 1970 but it's still not that bad.
The 2000 video version I have has "Yorga" spelled as "Iorga".
This was a huge hit in 1970 because it was the first modern vampire film. Up until then all vampire films had been set in Europe in the 1800s or early 1900s. This was the first vampire film set in modern day. Still it isn't a great film. It was originally shot with soft core sex scenes which were (pretty obviously) edited out and it was turned into a sleazy PG rated film. It was made on a very low budget (it shows) and suffers from some horrible 1970s fashions and dialogue. Also the makeup on the female vampires is pretty poor. Still this isn't a total disaster either.
The script is actually pretty intelligent considering this was a fairly rushed production. The acting is good--especially by Quarry who makes an imposing vampire. Very subtle performance but he handles the violent scenes quite well too. It moves at a fairly quick pace and has a great bloody climax--pretty extreme for a PG film. This won't impress audiences like it did in 1970 but it's still not that bad.
The 2000 video version I have has "Yorga" spelled as "Iorga".
At the time this film was made, vampires were almost always slow and hypnotic. This was really the first vampire film that treated them as swift and animalistic. That made this film surprisingly effective. It was even more surprising since it was originally supposed to be a pornographic vampire film called THE LOVES OF COUNT IORGA. It is flawed, but I still think it is the most effective vampire film I have ever seen. And I have seen quite a few.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis film was originally conceived as a low budget softcore pornography film titled "The Loves of Count Iorga, Vampire". Later, however, the decision was made to film it as a regular horror film with the less erotic title "Count Yorga, Vampire" . This name change explains the poor animation of the name "Count Yorga" in the film's title as it now appears on-screen. The original title and original Iorga spelling were both restored to the film by the 1990s, but all prints of it were still identical to the original 1970 release. Apparently, no additional footage survives from its original porn version of it at all and it is unknown if said version was actually filmed or, if it was filmed, whether or not it was finished or even released if it was (it is worth noting, however, that the characters often pronounce the Count's name within the film as "Iorga" (ee-yor-ga) and not as "Yorga" (yor-ga)).
- BlooperCount Yorga's fangs are inconsistent throughout the entire film: sometimes all of his visible teeth are pointed, but in a few shots only his canines are pointed while his incisors are not.
- Citazioni
Count Yorga: Doctor Hayes, what an unexpected surprise.
Dr. James Hayes: Yes, so much so that I almost had a massive coronary.
- Versioni alternativeThe new Twilight Time DVD version of the film contains a longer version of the kitten eating scene.
- ConnessioniEdited into Blacula (1972)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 64.000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Yorga il vampiro (1970) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi