Peccatori in blue jeans

many people think that the first period of marcel carné is the best,marcel carné is certainly the best french director from all time,the cheaters was realy dynamite at the time ,at the same time wasthe beginning of the so called "nouvelle vague" all the actors were wondurfull certainly laurent terzieff ,but also jacques charrier,pascale petit were great

This late 50s French study of disaffected youth (in their early 20's, actually--"grown up", but not yet settled down into the adult world) probably missed the mark by a mile in terms of being an accurate depiction of 1958 French youth (don't virtually ALL youth films made by adults do this? The ones that don't--River's Edge comes to mind-- are rare indeed), but director-writer Marcel Carne, of Les Enfants du Paradis fame, is too accurate an observer of humanity to NOT provide an insightful view of the essence of these characters. In a sense, the details are not important--you could change the details and set this film today and it would work just as well--but the loneliness and insecurity and superficial passion and self-righteous anger of the characters is captured well. The young Pierre Brice and Jean-Paul Belmondo are in supporting roles, but leads Jacques Charrier, Laurent Terzieff, Pascale Petit, and Andrea Parisy play the roles with subtlety and depth. There is also a fine jazz score, which you can get on the CD JAZZ IN PARIS--JAZZ & CINEMA VOL. 2. Unlike some who have commented on the film, I don't really see director-writer Carne as sitting in judgment on these characters--he seems as though he is an objective observer to me. Of course, these middle-class characters may seem like people who are spoiled and have nothing to whine about to some working-class viewers of the film, and I think Carne is certainly aware of this. For this American viewer (I watched a dubbed, fairly literally I'd say, version of this titled THE CHEATERS), the film provides an interesting window into the France of the 1950s. It also is self-consciously poetic (the scene on the ledge, saving the cat, is but one example of this) and has intellectual aspirations in that charming way that only French films can get away with--I can imagine the heavy-handed, melodramatic, shallow way this kind of material would have been handled by an American studio production, and the sensationalistic, moralistic, suggestive way this kind of material would have been handled by American drive-in/exploitation filmmakers. I feel that Marcel Carne has captured the essence of that period between, say, high school graduation and when, by one's early 30s, people have largely settled into a routine, whatever that routine may be. Those willing to watch the film with an open mind and not fire away at the many easy targets it offers should find a serious and valuable study of people in their early twenties. And even if you don't want to do that, you can go in the other room while the film is playing and simply enjoy the fine soundtrack, with great 50s jazz and instrumental pop, including the wonderful original score by an American "Jazz at the Philharmonic" group including Coleman Hawkins, Dizzy Gillespie, Stan Getz (spelled "goetz" in the credits), Roy Eldridge, and Ray Brown.

The poet Carne disappears (didn´t he disappeared with Prévert?) and is followed by the judge Carne. The director wants to give his own vision of a youth that he doesn´t understand and he doesn´t want to. It´s a long way from the wonderful "Les enfants du paradis"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Andrea Parisy, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit and certainly Laurent Terzieff could have been part of the Nouvelle Vague that was washing over France, and splashing over other countries at the time. They certainly had the acting ability to be part of it. The problem as I personally see it is that the supposed 'new' cinema (with all the arrogance of the new) did not recognise the full spectrum of cinema, or that Marcel Carne's films were distinctly great films and part of that spectrum. The Nouvelle Vague films made themselves special by taking the camera out on the streets (which also happens in 'Les Tricheurs') instead of being studio bound, and prejudice against the supposed 'ancien regime' was rife. 'Les Tricheurs' (forget the English title 'Youthful Sinners' which is nonsense. The title for the UK and elsewhere should have been 'The Cheaters') is a very good film indeed, and both the acting and the direction perfect. It is nonsense also to call it an existentialist scenario. It is quite simply the relationship between four central characters, and how love is destroyed because all of the four cannot take on the responsibility of loving. A lot of the action takes place at parties and a deadly verbal game sets the tragic climax into motion. No spoilers. Charrier is excellent as the less open of the four to open relationships, and Terzieff equally excellent as a young man who has his own mysterious agenda to destroy emotions. Pascale Petit is very good as the young woman who is troubled and confused, and so is Parisy as the jaded woman who holds parties and seduces as many men as possible. This film arguably was part of the Nouvelle Vague (see Chabrol's 'Les Cousins' for a prime example) and 'Les Tricheurs' should be better known and valued as an excellent film. Only seven reviews here shows to me that it should be restored and not undervalued.

It's generally an accepted fact that Marcel Carné's 1936-1946 movies are masterpieces and it's considered polite to say that the rest are mediocrities.This is an unfair opinion:at least ,two of the latter era are eminently watchable:"Thérèse Raquin" ,his best post-war work,and "les tricheurs" (the cheats).

There's a strange evolution from the Prevert golden hour to "les tricheurs":in "les enfants du paradis" "quai des brumes" or "le jour se lève",true love is thwarted by the villains. In "les tricheurs" true love does not exist anymore:we deal with a bunch of young people who believe in nothing;falling in love would be incongruous for this youth.The adults are not the villains at all:Mic's brother and mother are kind people ,but she is beyond their command.Very few grown-ups appear anyway.

During two hours,the characters do not stop playing around,dancing,listening to jazz records(a music which was not still part of the bourgeois culture),and heavily drinking .When two of them discover they care for each others ,it will be too late.

The cast is rather good ,Laurent Terzieff as an existentialist cynic and Andréa Parisy as a rich kid are the stand-outs.On the other hand,Pascale Petit and mainly Jacques Charrier(who married Brigitte Bardot the same year as "les tricheurs")do not possess the ambiguity their parts ask for.They are all smile,too sweet and to nice to be believable.

Oddly,"les tricheurs" was labeled "nouvelle vague"!When you know what the priests of this cinema school (the likes of Godard)thought of Carné ,it's really a good joke.But this disenchantment you feel throughout the whole movie is really disturbing.