Montparnasse

A few years ago it was hoped that Anouk Aimée would attend a screening of 'Lola' at the French Institute and afterwards answer audience questions. To my great disappointment and that of many others, Mlle Aimée failed to materialise.

I had been hoping to ask her just how much influence Modigliani's daughter Jeanne had on the making of 'Montparnasse 19' which covered the final year in her father's life.

She herself was two months old when he died at just thirty-five but her birth and her mother's suicide by defenestration are absent from the film.

The other mystery of course is how much of Henri Jeanson's original screenplay was changed or jettisoned when Jacques Becker took over the direction from an ailing Max Ophuls. By all accounts Jeanson was thoroughly displeased and took legal action.

What is certain of course is that cinematographer Christian Matras has shot this in the style of Becker and not of Ophuls. There are also scenes with which Ophuls would I'm sure have felt uncomfortable, not least that in which Beatrice Hastings asks Modigliani to hit her again after he has knocked her to the floor!

However ruthless, selfish or anti-social great painters might be they are invariably excused as their behaviour is considered part of the artistic temperament or the prerogative of genius.

Although Modigliani might not have been a jackpot of admirable character traits, the compromises of film dictate that his character be sympathetic. Gérard Philippe is ideal casting in this respect. Granted, the massive ego of the artist is there but also the despair and vulnerability.

It is a pity that the character of his common-law wife Jeanne Hébuterne is so thinly drawn here but Mlle Aimée does her best.

The two performances that stand out are those of Lilli Palmer who is magnificent as Beatrice and Lino Ventura as Morel, a morally vacuous art dealer who observes Modigliani's decline like a vulture circling a dying body.

As one would expect from Becker there is a wonderful sense of period and place and his direction is taut.

There are weaknesses to be sure but one accepts those in exchange for its strengths and the film has a special quality that is hard to define.

Becker was one of the select few that received approval from the Cahiers du Cinema/New Wave contingent.

Jean Luc Godard's appraisal is insightful: "Everything rings true in this totally false film. Everything is illuminated in this obscure film."

Ophuls died shortly before the film was released and within two years both Philippe and Becker had passed away. Ars longa. Vita brevis.

Released as a love letter to both the artist Amedeo Modigliani and the spirit of Montparnasse, Montparnasse 19 reverberates with the raw emotions of creativity and the tempestuousness of artistic existence. In this evocative narrative, the audience is transported to a world where the struggle for artistic expression collides with the fragility of life and love.

Within the dimly lit cafés and cobblestone streets of Montparnasse, Modigliani's tortured genius comes to life through the brilliant performance of Gérard Philipe. His portrayal captures the artist's paradoxes-his insatiable passion for his craft and the demons that wrestle within. Philipe breathes life into the artist's tempestuous relationships, including that with Jeanne Hébuterne, portrayed with delicate grace by Anouk Aimée, whose presence provides a poignant counterbalance to the turbulence of Modigliani's life.

Director Jacques Becker's meticulous attention to detail recreates the heart of Montparnasse's vibrant art scene-a scene teeming with eccentric characters, from painters to poets, each struggling to find their place in the world. The artistic fervor envelops the audience, inviting us to witness the intertwining threads of passion, inspiration, and sacrifice that weave the lives of these vibrant bohemian spirits.

Montparnasse 19 stands as an evocative testament to the eternal tug-of-war between art and life. Like Ernest Hemingway's A Moveable Feast and Charles Aznavour's La Bohème, it captures the essence of fleeting moments, of laughter in the face of adversity, and the melancholy that accompanies the passage of time. This film invites us to experience the intoxicating blend of love, art, and existence; and pays homage to the dreamers, the creators, and the eternal pulse of bohemian life.

Every generation sees or thinks it sees things differently from previous generations; this film shows yet again that bohemian boorishness and temperamental talent is and was nothing new. If you're seen to be an Artist also being a fascinating penniless perpetual drunk yob can be acceptable, that troubled spirit is sometimes the price of Genius. Amedeo Modigliani was an Italian artist who died at 36 of TB in France, the almost impossibly handsome Gerard Philipe who played him here died the year after the film also at 36 of cancer, and director Max Ophuls died before production started – it makes this French-Italian co-production especially poignant.

The story follows the last period of Modigliani's life about 1919, after he met and fell madly in love with fellow artist Jeanne Hebuterne, their trials, tribulations and tragedy. It's all done very well, definitely not as the elegant Ophuls would have done it (witness those clumsy tracking dancing scenes) with good black and white photography and great acting: basically no problems with any of it. However the end of the film was very different to the reality and bearing in mind it was fairly frank anyway I can't understand why the truth was jettisoned at the climax. Did Modigliani's daughter object? What actually happened was incredibly sad, brutal and even incomprehensible but still would have made more sense than the end to the film did. It turned a study in romance into a lesson in sordidness.

But never mind, it was still an interesting journey into an Artist's troubled mind and life and the joy and pain he brought to those around him. I wouldn't hang one of Modigliani's hideous paintings up in my house unless I was paid a lot to; I prefer the film – because Beauty is either in the eye of the beholder or the owner.

In 1919, the painter Amedeo Modigliani spent the last year of his life. He lived in abject poverty in the Parisian artists' quarter of Montparnasse. This is the story of the film by French director Jacques Becker (1906-1960), who created such masterpieces as TOUCHEZ PAS AU GRISBI (1954) and LE TROU (1960).

Modigliani (Gérard PHILIPE) is kept afloat by Anna Zbirowska (Lila KEDROVA / OSCAR 1965: ACADEMY AWARD for ALEXIS SORBAS) and her husband, and his gallerist Berthe Weill (Marianne OSWALD) also tries hard to find buyers for his paintings. But it's simply not enough. The handsome Modigliani also has to accept payment for his sexual services from the British writer Beatrice Hastings (Lilli PALMER / GOLDEN GLOBE 1960: nomination for BUT NOT FOR ME). The only bright spot in this messed-up situation is his tender love for the young Jeanne (Anouk AIMÉE / OSCAR 1967: nomination for UN HOMME ET UNE FEMME). But the path to self-inflicted ruin seems inevitable. Or could the interest of the art dealer Morel (very diabolical: Lino VENTURA) bring the longed-for salvation?

Jacques BECKER took on this commissioned directorial role as a replacement for his idolized Max OPHÜLS. Becker apparently got along well with the leading actor Gérard PHILIPE (1922-1959), but he apparently rejected his style of performance. Becker couldn't have prevented such a major French film star as Philippe from appearing, even though it completely contradicted his style of filmmaking. This is certainly evident in the film, but Becker has turned it into the eternal drama of a misunderstood artist (the complete opposite of Philippe), who can only be "recognized" by the audience after his death.

The wonderful Lilli Palmer (1914-1986) plays her small role superbly, as always. The lack of dubbing makes it possible to discover today what was cut from the film for West German audiences at the time. At the very beginning, the writer played by Palmer ends up in bed with the main character and is seen again after the act. Seeing the crowd-pleaser Palmer in such a compromising situation was probably too much for West German audiences to bear at the time. Bygone days!

I love this French romantic dramas. This one have a big of a drama as well behind the camera.

Gérard Philipe was hired to work with Max Ophüls, unfortunately Ophüls died in production of this film not even finished to read the script made by Henri Jeanson who after his death fought vehemently with Becker to keep the original script. He didn't, he accept to film this Biopic for the admiration he had for Ophüls that before he died asked him to do the film. Jeanson did quit the film, Becker had terrible communication with the main actor Gérard Philipe for differences in how to approach scenes and they disagree constantly on set. Tragically Philip will die a year after this film was concluded at 36 of Liver cancer and Becker 3 years later at 53

This is the story of the last year in the life of Amadeo Modigliani the great Italian painter, theres a reference in my favourite scene of the film that Modi will cite Van Gogh talking about the fact of painting simple every day men instead of cathedrals. The question is asked by the ignorant millionaire who is trying to buy his paintings to use them as publicity banners, and that Modi strictly reject the offer. I felt so overwhelmed of passion and respect for him as the story is reared to this moment and the facial aspect of Gérard "ces't magnifique"

La dernière scène, le "marchand d'art" comme un corbeau attend sa mort puis, comme une lance, donne la poussée finale à Amadeo et Jeanne c'est terrible et la route avant sa mort m'a rendu très triste Es una película preciosa e inolvidable.