Il treno

The premise truly fascinated me, a premise or at least subject that sounded like the film would be a powerful one. John Frankenheimer was responsible for some great work, 'The Manchurian Candidate' instantly coming to my mind as being one of his best. The cast would be reason enough on its own, so imagine having the subject and Frankenheimer as director also being big main reasons, to see it, having admired a good deal of work from both Burt Lancaster and Paul Scofield.

Seeing 'The Train' two days ago, what instantly came to my mind after watching was "wow!" Like most people here, to me this was a pretty exceptional film that really packs a punch in a way that not many films of its year, decade or even genre at this point of film history did. Truly powerful work that took risks and pulls no punches in a way that still has the ability to shock, no trivialising or sugar-coating here. Quite the opposite. As far as WWII films go, it is one of the best and despite being highly praised deservedly more people should know about it, it is really quite something and unlike a lot of films personally seen.

Maybe 'The Train' runs a little too long by about 15 minutes or so, which occasionally (emphasis on that word) affects the pace.

On occasions too early on, for my tastes Maurice Jarre's music score jarred a bit and like it belonged more in a comedy.

Conversely, there are so many strengths (which is actually pretty much everything else) and everything else is executed flawlessly. 'The Train' is quite masterful visually, the photography is full of atmosphere and played a huge part in making the train itself like its own character. Have never seen a train so cleverly, intimately and powerfully used. The French locations are incredibly well utilised, some of the best use of French locations for any film seen in a long time from personal view. On a technical level, the action with the train is enough to make the jaw drop today. Frankenheimer's direction is hugely accomplished and not since 'The Big Parade' as far as recent film viewings go has there been direction for any film that was this visually flawless. Most of Jarre's score works very well, when it becomes more subtle and more harmonious with the atmosphere it is quite hauntingly unsettling.

Script is very intelligent and thought-provoking, taut enough while allowing breathing space yet not rambling. The story is hugely compelling, is very intense especially the exciting action with the train and is emotionally powerful. Found myself quite moved and shocked at how much the more uncompromising moments (and there are many) wrenched the gut, haven't seen an ending this poetic in a while either. The characters are well defined and interesting. There are great performances from all, with Lancaster superb in one of his best performances. He tells so much with his face and eyes and could tell he meant every word with his line delivery, he is especially good in the last twenty minutes where words are few but one intensely feels his hurt and anger. Scofield has seldom been nastier or at times even frightening. Jeanne Moreau's role isn't huge but she is sympathetic in it and an atypically cast Michel Simon is very telling in his.

In summary, exceptional and one of the best WWII films. 9/10

Like everyone else who has posted here, I think this film is superb. Brilliant screenplay, excellent acting, exceptional directing, and so on and so forth. I think there is one little twist to the screenplay that deserves mention. Burt Lancaster has not one spoken line in the final 20 minutes of the movie. I can't recall ever seeing that done with a major character in a mainstream film. His actions ARE his words. In the final scene, we know exactly what he is thinking without him saying a word. A lovely subtle touch and the crowning moment in a truly great film.

For me, the concept of an 'action' film is the most curious, as many examples of the genre seem very static to me - even today where it seems that anything can be shown on screen. A fight, car crash, explosion, etc is rehearsed, staged, simultaneously photographed and edited in a certain way that brings out and sometimes enhances the action. But, as the event is meticulously planned, rigorously controlled and sometimes, or always re-shot, spontaneity cannot be part of the action, or plays a small part. The action may be impressive, but it still seems unreal, too chaotic, or even more importantly, the sense that the action is not integrated into the story and maybe even more importantly, the attitude and motivation of the characters. Most action films are far from being this sophisticated.

Almost everything that Burt Lancaster does, or experiences in John Frankenheimer's, THE TRAIN seems real, necessary and interesting. He did all his own stunts in the film, learned to cast driving axle-bearings, which we see in the film in a continuous take. Frankenheimer was one of the true masters of the audacious, complicated, continuous scene and this film has many astounding set-pieces. The film is also one of the last great films shot in deep focus black and white (mostly with a 25mm lens) and it is the bold, striking compositions of the intense and vigorous action that elevates the film to an even higher level. Frankenheimer never took the bland, straightforward choices of blocking and positioning the camera in his films - certainly not in the first half of his career and THE TRAIN is a veritable textbook in imaginative visual directing.

There is great sense of danger in the film, much like the feeling that THE WAGES OF FEAR produces - and indeed in one scene, we see an actual train-crash that smashed nine cameras, and was only captured by one camera which yielded one of the most startling shots in all of Cinema! The whole film has sense of almost reckless daring, but was carefully controlled throughout. The scene where Albert Rémy uncouples the engine from the cars is insane! I can't think of another film where a key actor does something so dangerous on their own, with a stunt double.

But all of these scenes and shots serve the story, which is in itself fascinating. It asks the question: What is more important - irreplaceable works of art or the lives of common human beings? Col. von Waldheim is an unorthodox Nazi, who has a deep admiration for 'decadent' paintings and is willing to save them possess or save them at any cost , regardless of his orders. Paul Labiche knows trains inside out, but a painting means as much to him as "a string of pearls to an ape," but his morals are infinitely more compassionate than von Waldheim, which he makes clear without speech at the end - where, in fact, twenty minutes go by without Lancaster uttering a single word, which was unheard of them of a superstar male actor, but it totally appropriate. It is one of the great performances in all of war/action Cinema, I feel. And his antagonist is the legendary Paul Scofield in his first screen appearance in six years, who is, as always, magnificent. Everyone did a first-rate job on this film, yet only the screenwriters were nominated for the 1966 Oscars (the film was not released until May 1965 in the USA) which is yet another example of Academy madness.

Everything about THE TRAIN is unconventional. It was made at a time when other studios and directors would have gone for colour and CinemaScope, Frankenheimer went for deep-focus, black and white 1.66:1, went for authenticity, verisimilitude - no back-projection or models. Arthur Penn actually began the film, but I have never been able to ascertain how much material he shot, or why he was fired, but it would have been a very different movie; Frankenheimer's vigorous, but elegant style is so perfectly right for this film.

One thing that makes some films extra special is those that have many scenes where a process is at work and is shown in detail, seem more powerful. One cannot shown process in any other medium of art. Heist scenes, as in THE ASPHALT JUNGLE, RIFIFI, LE CERCLE ROUGE, etc are prime examples, the escape preparations in Robert Bresson's, A MAN ESCAPED and Jacques Becker's, LE TROU are also enthralling and 'make' each movie what it is. The working out of a life-or-death puzzle, as in BLOW-UP, THE CONVERSATION and De Palma's, BLOW OUT also illustrate the power of the medium. What makes these scenes - 'process of action' - interesting and occasionally powerful, is that they make us look at human interaction with matter is a different, even deeper way. Slow motion cinematography remains one of man's greatest inventions. Before it, we had no idea how fast moving objects worked or behaved. There was over 50 years of gunfire in Cinema, until we saw what a bullet leaving the barrel of a gun looked like, in THE OMEN (1976). It spins, for one thing. That must have surprised many people.

On the whole and after seeing it for the first time in about six years, I firmly feel that THE TRAIN is one of the greatest action films ever made, not only for its audacious crashes, bold style and unobtrusive score by Maurice Jarre, but also for it simply being a fascinating and unusual story this is brilliantly acted.

This is truly a riveting and original film. Filmed in glorious B&W with mostly a 28mm lens, this crisp and stark looking film never lets up in suspense and tension. Lancaster is at the top of his form and Paul Scofield steals the scenes he is in. The train whistle always jolts one out of his or her seat. I have every single video version of this film and I just never get tired of this film. I implore everyone to take this ride.

The movie is about a episode that happened in 1944. When France was still occupied by the Nazis, they decided to steal paintings from the Paris museums. This film is about a shipment that the French has to save before he ends to Germans, but they also don't want to be destroyed in the process.

Burt Lancaster stars as a French train engineer that has to transport the shipment. At first is not a easy task, but he succeeds in the end. Meanwhile he becomes friend with a hotel owner played by French actress Jeanne Moreau (that passed away last year). And the other members of the cast are fine. Paul Scofield as a German general is great (and Scofield also starred in other great movies after this), and it was a treat seeing French comedian Michel Simon in a war movie (just like Bourvil in THE LONGEST DAY).

This movie had great direction by John Frankenheimer, great performances by all the actors, and also great photography in Black and White. Although a bit dragged in some places, it was still great to watch! And as a fan of the history from 1850 until these days, I liked the movie for his accuracy and his action scenes.