[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Indietro
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro
Ammutinamento nello spazio (1964)

Recensioni degli utenti

Ammutinamento nello spazio

27 recensioni
6/10

Entertaining B scifi programmer

While this movie was made just a few years prior to 2001 A Space Odyssey, it seems very much a throwback to the decade prior. I watched it with that level of suspension of disbelief, treating it like 1950s B science fiction, and found it fast-paced and entertaining. Naturally, the science is not very scientific, but that is never the point in this kind of movie anyway. What I genuinely admire about this little low-budget flick is that all of the actors take their roles seriously, so not only is the acting not half-bad, there are even a few moments where it seems almost to naturalistic. In addition, the screenwriter/s made some attempts at banter between the characters which actually work fairly well. Similarly, we even have a few oblique camera angles and a POV shot of the fungus crawling over the camera lens. None of these little creative flourishes would have found their way into a little movie like this if the technicians involved weren't making some effort.

Mutiny in Outer Space is not a classic, but it is a fun relic for fans of this kind of movie from that era, and it's good that it has managed to survive in the public domain.
  • ebeckstr-1
  • 4 nov 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

Not as bad as I expected...in fact, I think it's worth seeing.

On the way from the moon to the space station, a fungus breaks out on the rocket and it's alarming how quickly the stuff is spreading. Unfortunately, the Commander seems to be space sick and won't even listen to the warnings by some of his crew. Instead, he orders the ship to continue towards the station, and it ends up spreading the fungus there as well. To make it worse, the fungus kills! If the Commander doesn't relent, mutiny is sure to break out sooner or later.

This movie is a mixed bag. The special effects are pretty shabby (particularly the space footage), though that's pretty much true of ALL space films made before "2001". The dialog is pretty sexist at times...again, a product of the times. But the story itself is actually pretty good as the megalomaniacal angle was pretty good and makes the film worth your time if you like this sort of thing.
  • planktonrules
  • 23 dic 2017
  • Permalink
6/10

Unconventional

  • Thorsten-Krings
  • 30 set 2008
  • Permalink

"What In The Tarnation Is Going On Out There?!"...

In MUTINY IN OUTER SPACE, ice caves have been discovered on the lunar surface. A team is dispatched to gather samples from the caves. On the way back to Earth, the astronauts stop off at Space Station X-7.

Oh no!

It seems they've arrived at a bad time, since the station's commander is under stress from too much time in space, and could be cracking up! In addition to this, the new guests have brought something with them from the moon. Something alien and infinitely dangerous! Then, the obligatory meteor shower hits! All of this has a detrimental effect on the romances on board the station!

As the commander goes increasingly bananas, the alien organism spreads, turning the station into a floating hell!

Sort of THE GREEN SLIME meets THE CAINE MUTINY, this movie is a cheeeze-corn classic, complete with derring-do, fuzzy fungus monsters, and fashionable females in form-fitting uniforms!

Highly entertaining...
  • Dethcharm
  • 18 gen 2019
  • Permalink
3/10

brain dead science fiction...

... from writers/directors Arthur C. Pierce & Hugo Grimaldi. In the far future of the late 1990's, the U. S. Space Station X-7 becomes infested by a fungus discovered in the ice caves of the Moon. Maj. Towers (William Leslie) wants to quarantine the station and prevent any exposure to Earthbound vessels or personnel, but station chief Col. Cromwell (Richard Garland) orders the news of the fungus to be kept secret, partly as to not tarnish his command's reputation, but mainly because the Colonel is suffering from "space raptures", a sort of cabin fever. Maj. Towers realize there may be no choice but to organize a - Mutiny in Space! Also featuring Harold Lloyd Jr.

This cheap, B&W bore features some truly atrocious miniature effects, awful acting (James Dobson as the station doctor takes the prize for worst), and a dreadful script loaded with phony "space" jargon. The fungus looks like Spanish moss mixed with something the cat threw up. The men all wear baggy space uniforms, while the women's are skin-tight. At one point, heroine Dolores Faith quietly voices her trepidation about the station's fate, prompting William Leslie to slap her in the face. Naturally, she quickly apologizes to him and asks if he'll still have her. Those were the days!
  • AlsExGal
  • 30 dic 2022
  • Permalink
5/10

Space girls in rubber suits fight fungus

Never did see a mutiny. It is more of a space station being contaminated by a fungus. Looks like the station will have to be dispatched before the Earth is fungicides. We are mesmerized by Dolores Faith. But her rubber suit is very clunky. Can the space station be saved or do you feel like something is itching where it should not be itching?

Filmed in six days at a whopping $90,000. And it shows. Could have been a Commander Cody or Captain Midnight quality

William Leslie as Maj. Gordon Towers Dolores Faith as Faith Montaine Pamela Curran as Lt. Connie Engstrom Richard Garland as Col. Frank Cromwell Harold Lloyd Jr. As Sgt. Andrews James Dobson as Dr. Hoffman Ron Stokes as Sgt. Sloan Boyd Holister as Maj. Olsen Gabriel Curtiz as Dr. Stoddard Glenn Langan as Gen. Knowland H. Kay Stephens as Sgt. Engstrom Francine York as Capt. Stevens Joel Smith Carl Crow as Capt. Dan Webber.
  • Bernie4444
  • 30 dic 2023
  • Permalink
5/10

A nice little movie

I watched this movie first when I visited my best friend, it´s a tradition watching a DVD-movie when we met. It was not a well-known low-price-DVD which I didn´t know yet. The effects were lousy, the actors average, but this movie has a certain charme. If only Ed Wood had worked this way...

Regards, Hans-Dieter
  • Prometheus9263
  • 29 mag 2003
  • Permalink
7/10

Satisfactory Sixties Outer Space Quickie, Slightly More Serious in Tone Than Usual

  • richardchatten
  • 12 mag 2017
  • Permalink
5/10

Hair and Fungus

It isn't so much the special effects, that kills Mutiny in Outer Space (1965), as much as, the bad acting, horrible soundtrack and the creature effects, looked really bad. The monster-fungus looked like wet hair, rolled up from the salon floor. The story is slow and wrinkly, but it is about a lunar fungus, wreaking havoc on a space station. There really isn't much more there to go with. The version of the film that I saw, was in 4:3. The audio sounded like it was uploaded to the streamer I used, incorrectly. What was good about Mutiny in Outer Space (1965), was the human part of the plot. There are a lot of strong, confident, female characters in the film. It showed, that the audience in 1965, was looking towards the future.

In Mutiny in Outer Space (1965), director, Hugo Grimaldi, explores the ideas of time spent in space, human endurance in zero-gravity, the vastness of space corrupting the human mind and the effects space travel has on the physical body. They even explained how the fungus, which can't stand cold temperatures, is attached to the outside hull of the spaceship, even though we know, space is cold and frigid. I won't tell you why or how it is, but they did fix a believability question, by explaining that plot point to us. The film is an E for Effort and is recommended, as a viewpoint from a 1960s, science-fiction, low-budget perspective. You can tell, that the producers of this film tried their best, but the budget just wasn't there.

4.9 (E+ MyGrade) = 5 IMDB.
  • PCC0921
  • 30 ott 2022
  • Permalink
7/10

Good sci-fi outer space movie

I found this to be a good science fiction movie, although the special effects were weak. It has a crew revolt, ala The Caine Mutiny as noted in another review, as they have to overcome the mental breakdown of the station's commander to combat a fast-growing deadly fungus. It has elements of realism harking back to The Thing from Outer Space and the authorities at space command actually show intelligence by anticipating actions taken by the crew, understanding the nature of the fungus, and offering a possible solution to saving the crew and station.

If you can ignore the lack of good special effects, this movie is worth the time.
  • philamax
  • 16 gen 2021
  • Permalink
5/10

Mutiny in Outer Space

A ship en route to a space station is attacked by a deadly space fungus. The ship's commander (William Leslie) has succumbed to some sort of space sickness and is determined to press on to their destination - of course, taking the plague with him. Once they arrive, mutiny is their only option if any/all are to survive as the fungus runs riot on the base too. Despite the fact that this was made in 1965, it has a very 1950's look about it; the dialogue isn't quite so stilted and the cast do a decent job here. The effects are very basic, but they don't matter so much - this is just quite good fun.
  • CinemaSerf
  • 4 set 2024
  • Permalink
8/10

Mutiny in Outer Space is well worth your time!!

Shot in black and white, Mutiny in Outer Space one of the lesser known 50's sci-fi, probably because it wasn't made until 1965, but worry not - it is made in the same mold as most other 50's sci-fi in regards to script, acting and special effects. An Italian/USA production with all English speaking actors - no annoying dubbing here folks.

The special effects includes ship launches, dockings, space station shots, a killer fungus, and some rather convincing makeup effects for on contaminated crew members. All work well to serve the story, just remember these are still pre-Star Wars effects and in alignment with what you have see in other 50's sci-fi...

I find this film to be much more entertaining than the supposed classic with similar storyline 'It! the Terror from Beyond Space' made nearly ten years earlier.

Well worth your time seeking this flick out. The transfer available is magnificent and much better than some of the commercial 50's sci-fi titles out there!!

By way of comparison, MIOS is much more engaging than other 50's fare such as The Unknown Terror, The Flame Barrier, or Curucu-Beast of the Amazon. Check it out!!!
  • captainapache
  • 28 ott 2006
  • Permalink
6/10

Entertaining B scifi programmer

Well this movie was made just a few years prior to 2001 A Space Odyssey, it seems very much a throwback to the decade prior. I watched it with that level of suspension of disbelief, treating it like 1950s be science fiction, and found it fast-paced and entertaining. Naturally, the science is but science is never the point well this kind of movie anyway. What I genuinely admire about this little low-budget flick is that all of the actors take their roles seriously, so not only is the acting not half-bad, there are even a few moments where it seems almost to naturalistic. In addition, the screenwriter/s made some attempts at banter between the characters which actually work fairly well. Similarly, we even have a few oblique camera angles and a POV shot of the fungus crawling over the camera lens. None of these little creative flourishes would have found their way into a little movie like this if the technicians involved weren't making some effort.

Mutiny in Outer Space is not a classic, but it is a fun relic for fans of this kind of movie from that era, and it's good that it has managed to survive in the public domain.
  • ebeckstr-1
  • 4 nov 2019
  • Permalink
2/10

'Alien' and even 'Star Trek' antecedent spots, clunker in space: better billed as 'The 'Creeping Fungus'.

  • Bofsensai
  • 2 mar 2024
  • Permalink
4/10

Low grade sci-fi

  • Leofwine_draca
  • 2 dic 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Great torment value

I normally enjoy these old SF movies but this was truly awful. I could barely keep my eyes open
  • trevorlitchfield-93554
  • 26 ott 2020
  • Permalink
5/10

I'll never look at moldy bread the same way again.

  • mark.waltz
  • 18 feb 2022
  • Permalink
7/10

A mix of artful and pleasantly awful.

Great cinematography, and the special effects that DON'T show spacecraft or the "alien lifeform" are quite good. Striking use of light and shadow, especially in the early scenes.

There's cheesy space ship miniatures, and a few nonsensical plot points. Also apparently many newspapers printed in foreign languages feature English headlines (Who knew?).

It works both on a "so-bad-it's-good" and a serious film level, though better at the former than the latter. If you want to get the most out of this film's serious side, just remember that "the past is a foreign country." as they say.
  • k-kennedy-spaien
  • 12 lug 2019
  • Permalink
5/10

It could have been a contender...

  • pattonroxanne
  • 3 lug 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

Basic

Although dated 1965, this sci-fi outer space flick has a definite fifties look.

It looks much like a McCarthy era film very basic, with a very basic, standard backdrop, and yet it has a 1965 message of anti McCarthy distrust of authority.

That's fairly fresh, because we get the black and white basic look of the hard nosed authoritarian era, but in this movie, it is the commander of the unit in space who becomes deranged, though it be by a space fungus, still he becomes the unruly one.

The story flows well, and there are some leggy gals strutting their stuff for the young boys.

An interesting combination of two eras, taking the best of both eras. The stark, unassuming sets that let us enjoy the story (fifties style) and the notation that authority figures aren't always perfect (sixties).
  • drystyx
  • 28 ago 2015
  • Permalink
8/10

Surprised by the quality of the acting, characters!

This movie obviously didn't have a lot of budget to work with, but a strong ensemble of actors really helps to humanize its story. Where there's an interesting storyline and believable, likable, three dimensional characters, I can forgive a sci fi movie's weak special effects.
  • dane-92
  • 5 ott 2019
  • Permalink
6/10

MORE SERIOUS THAN MOST...TALKY & PLAYFUL...THEN SUSPENSEFUL & SCI-ENCY

Has More of that 1960's Serious Vibe than its 50's Cousins.

But Echoes Remain with Some of the Models, SFX, and Ridiculous Teen-Age Type Flirting in the 1st Act.

Things Tense-Up Once a Fungus is Discovered and then Spreads Throughout the Space-Station.

The Story is a Familiar One, but the Mutiny Angle is Rare in Space Movies.

The Rocket-Ships are Nifty but the Station, Exteriors, while Cool are Probably Over-Used.

The Creeping Organic Terror Does Most of its Creeping Across the Ship and Not On the Crew and is Sort of, Well, Creepy.

Not a Bad "B" with about a $90,000 Budget.

It Comes Off Like an Episode of a TV Show Mostly, but a Good TV Show.

Some Serious Effort was Done to Make this Better than it Should.

With an Above Average Script and Detailed Set and Model Work that Delivers a Notch Above the Standard Stuff.

In just a Few Years Stanley Kubrick would Shake-Up the Sci-Fi Movie World.

Then Thinking on these Things would Never be the Same Again.

Worth a Watch.
  • LeonLouisRicci
  • 10 ago 2021
  • Permalink
7/10

Better as a TV program?

Very nearly an episode of Star Trek in that the idea is good but it feels episodic. The film stock and sound quality were poor and whilst some acting was good a lot was toe curling.
  • stevelomas-69401
  • 29 feb 2020
  • Permalink
6/10

A well-paced and entertaining sci-fi film hampered by its low budget

Mutiny in Outer Space was filmed in six days at Producers Studio in Hollywood, on a budget of approximately $90,000. Space Station X and Invasion from the Moon were the film's working titles. Although it was filmed in the US, the film is an Italian-American co-production. In the US, Mutiny in Outer Space was theatrically released as the second film of a double feature with The Human Duplicators, another such co-production.

The film is obviously quite cheaply made and it has the feel of being a throw-back to the science fiction films of the previous decade. However, some of the ideas presented are really quite interesting, while others are fairly naive and embarrassing even for the time. Among these are:

In relation to the scene in which the old communications satellite is on a collision course with Space Station X-7, we are reminded of the presence of space junk being an ever growing hazard to satellites and space craft in low orbit in our own time!.

Ice Caves on the moon: Recently we have detected the presence of water ice on the polar regions of the moon and within craters that are permanently in shadow. This also presents us with the possibility of obtaining both water and fuel for future lunar bases and missions to other planets.

Probe Ship Number Five and its "electronic skipper:" So much of space travel in our own era in terms of guidance, navigation, rendezvous and docking procedures is becoming more and more routine and automated.

The fungus and its survival in outer space: The Apollo 12 mission to the moon brought back to earth a camera from a Surveyor craft that was accidentally contaminated prior to launch with a common type of bacterium, Streptococcus mitis. The bacteria had apparently survived dormant in the harsh lunar environment for two and a half years. It begs the question as to what else could survive the extreme conditions of outer space and what kind of potential threat would be posed to life on earth?

Finally, there is the question of the "human element" that General Knowland was so worried about in relation to our presence in outer space. Who is to say what kind of toll an environment for which evolution has not adequately equipped us may have on our physiological and psychological state?
  • christopouloschris-58388
  • 30 apr 2024
  • Permalink
6/10

Not bad for a low-budget space opera

The commander of Space Station X-7 has a nervous breakdown after astronauts returning from the moon accidently infect the station with a deadly lunar fungus. For a low-budget Italian-American space opera, 'Mutiny in Outer Space' is not bad. The film's look and script is much more 'realistic' than is typical for the genre and although the story's ultimate resolution is a bit weak, the parallel narratives (dealing with the fungus and dealing with the deranged commander) are reasonably well played out. The special effects are fairly rudimentary (images of the space station are occasionally reversed) and most of the spaceship footage is recycled from Antonio Margheriti's 'Space-Men' (1960), itself one of the less visually interesting space operas to come out of Italy in the 1960s. Although scenic, neither Dolores Faith nor Pamela Curran add much to the movie and the male leads are pretty much clichés (the only interesting character is Frank Cromwell (Richard Garland), the delirious commander who is suffering from "space raptures"). The film opens with the station being forced to dodge some space debris (also borrowed from 'Space-Men'), making it one of the one of the first sci-fi films to reference what is now a real problem: the accumulation of space 'junk' in orbit around Earth. 'Mutiny in Space' is a po-faced yet moderately entertaining 'realist' space opera - more like one of Ivan Tors' 'hard-science' OSI yarns than its silly but stylish Italian brethren.
  • jamesrupert2014
  • 2 feb 2021
  • Permalink

Altro da questo titolo

Altre pagine da esplorare

Visti di recente

Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
Scarica l'app IMDb
Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
Segui IMDb sui social
Scarica l'app IMDb
Per Android e iOS
Scarica l'app IMDb
  • Aiuto
  • Indice del sito
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
  • Sala stampa
  • Pubblicità
  • Lavoro
  • Condizioni d'uso
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una società Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.