Aquamania

In the early 1960s, Disney discovered a way to make far less expensive cartoons. They used copy machines to copy backgrounds and characters to speed up the animation process. Although fast, it also resulted in rather ugly films compared to their films of the 1950s. The newer cartoons look 'muddier' and less polished. In addition, "Aquamania" also has incredibly simple backgrounds...often splashy and lacking detail. As a result, this Goofy cartoon looks like none before or after.

The story itself, unlike the animation, is excellent. Goofy and his son (who looks little like their later version of Max) are out waterskiing. Goofy skis and his son drives the boat...and they accidentally enter a race...and chaos ensues.

This is a fun cartoon and you will enjoy it. The only reason I scored it 6 is because it just looks cheap...very cheap.

Yeah, Goofy is in a boat race and totally turns the whole thing into a disaster. The problem is that Goofy has covered the same ground before in an episode called HOW TO SWIM which was infinitely funnier. This feels more like a weak re-hash.

It's far too long and relies almost entirely on an anthropomorphic octopus for comic relief. Also, the style of the early 60's with Disney with lots of really rough sketchy edges (like 101 DALMATIONS) does not fit Goofy at all. It feels a lot less fun and a bit sloppy and messy. I think this is his only cartoon from the period and certainly feels incongruous from his better (more hilarious) work from the 40's and 50's. Particularly, stick with HOW TO SWIM.

This cartoon, nominated for an Oscar, is one of the sports-oriented cartons Disney made featuring that graceful soul, Goofy. While this is a good cartoon and is well worth seeking out, there truly isn't anything exceptionally special about this cartoon. It is typical of the series-a narrator talks about the actions, and the consequences rising from those actions, of your "average man" (Goofy) while Goofy goes through sight gag after sight gag. This runs on The Ink and Paint Club periodically. Recommended.

I recently saw this short on the Disney Channel. It features Goofy and his son, who I don't know the name of. In the short, Goofy and his son plan to go boating on a peaceful sunny day in the ocean, but end up getting involved in a crazy boat race and not to mention a run in with an octopus. I thought this cartoon was one of Goofy's greatest hits and possibly the last of his greatest as he would appear on the children's show "Goof Troop", which is just plain boring (although I liked it as a kid). This short will make people of all ages laugh.

Disney Plus's short film section appears to have had a bit of a revamp, so there are some new shorts that have appeared nearer the top. One such film is "Aquamania" a 1961 cartoon starring Goofy as a man involved with some water-based entertainment.

Having indulged in the very familiar American pastime of owning a boat, Mr X (Goofy) (Pinto Colvig) heads to the open water with his son to engage in some water skiing. Goofy Jnr (Kevin Corcoran) though is a little over enthusiastic and enters a race. Having gone underwater, Goofy collects an innocent Octopus who ends up participating in the race with them.

Definite and obvious change in visual style here from the classic era cartoons from twenty years earlier. I'd describe it as being 60's style, rather than having that enduring look. Wikipedia tells me that this is the first Goofy cartoon to use Xerography as a technique, which I think makes the dark black lines stand out a little more. The same technique would be used on "One Hundred and One Dalmatians" that was also released this year.

I often find it tough to review these cartoons, as I can remember when access to these was rare, so they were delightful additions to a TV schedule. It doesn't work like that now though, and I'm looking for things that my forty-year-old brain appreciatse, rather than the six-year-old one. It's not much fun though, despite the wild ride that Goofy ends up going on and certainly once the analogy to alcoholism is done.

Too much quality to dislike it, but not enough going on to really like it.