Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA bet on a fixed boxing match leads to death, intrigue, murder and romance in this banter-filled noir B-movie. Then a woman hires O'Brien to pretend to be a woman's husband, but she already ... Leggi tuttoA bet on a fixed boxing match leads to death, intrigue, murder and romance in this banter-filled noir B-movie. Then a woman hires O'Brien to pretend to be a woman's husband, but she already has a husband--her cousin. Bodies keep piling up.A bet on a fixed boxing match leads to death, intrigue, murder and romance in this banter-filled noir B-movie. Then a woman hires O'Brien to pretend to be a woman's husband, but she already has a husband--her cousin. Bodies keep piling up.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Bookie
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Boxing Match Spectator
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Waiter
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Nightclub Patron
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
I wonder if this wasn't supposed to be some kind of TV pilot, because it is divided into two thirty minute tales in which the main character, O'Brien, agrees to do something for money for some shadowy or unknown character, gets double crossed, and then has to solve what happened or take the fall. A police detective, inspector Bruger, who seems to know him always shows up to accuse him of murder. So we have a protagonist who makes bad decisions and a police detective who always draws wrong conclusions. I can see why the networks thought this might not work out in the long term.
Of course, most people know Hugh Beaumont as TV dad Ward Cleaver in Leave It To Beaver, and I have to think that gig worked out better than had he played O'Brien in a TV series knock off of this film. O'Brien's roommate and partner is "the professor" played by an out of place Ed Brophy. Brophy was an assistant director who became, after sound came in, a supporting player portraying various barely literate lugs and thugs. Here he is portraying a somewhat alcoholic intellectual who talks of Shakespeare. If you know him from any of his earlier film roles, it is a sight to be seen.
Finally, let me get to that dialogue. Absolutely do not play a drinking game every time you hear a line of over done noir dialogue that sounds like satire rather than the way actual people - hard boiled or not - would ever talk. You'll be dead in twenty minutes.
Recommended for the fun of it all.
As I said above, the plot seemed incidental. It all begins with Beaumont playing a private detective who will do almost anything for a buck. A crook wants him to place some bets in his name--as a boxing match has been fixed (boxing not on the level--say is ain't so!). But, when the losing boxer WINS, things start spiraling out of control and Beaumont finds himself suspected of the murder. There is LOTS more to it than that and who is responsible and why is dandy....but the road there is full of a bazillion twists and turns. Relax is my advice...and just enjoy the ride. This is a wonderful example of a low-budget noir film that manages to be better than many of the bigger studio efforts! See it.
Actually, with Beaumont there's something ,almost, to like as his charisma occasionally comes through. But, then there's the quirks that apparently the producer and director insert. For one, the "tough guy" dialog is downright laughable akin to the intentional use of such for comedic effect in the Steve Martin flick "Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid". Only it's unintentional here thus really bad without the comic relief. It's a big fail.
Also, because this isn't actually a feature B flick at all things never flow. The producer/director/writers have stitched together two segments that must have been meant for a TV pilot and first episode (that were not good enough even for that). So, it's a fledging wannabe movie. The word "clunky" comes to mind even if it was a money move to meet the demand for the double features of the day. Besides Beaumont there isn't much in the acting department either. It leaves one thinking even if there wasn't a financial loss careers were muddied. Somewhere in this mess something quite a bit better could have been crafted around Beaumont's character. It wasn't and instead this is the lame result. It's basically a waste, a which is a generous way to say it's laughably terrible. Don't bother with this one.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizEdited down to two segments, each re-titled, this was sold to television in the early 1950s as two parts of a syndicated half hour mystery show.
- BlooperO'Brien lays on the couch starting with one hand over the other then he interlaces them. However, on the next immediate cut, O'Brien now has his left hand resting on his right wrist. Then on the next cut after that, he is back to having the hands interlaced.
- Citazioni
Dennis O'Brien: [opening narration] San Francisco's a conservative place; famous for good food, good families, good business. And sometimes even people from Boston move out here. But down on the Waterfront, it's a different story because a bluenose down here is a guy who is either drunk or dead. Along the Embarcadero, the piers come in different sizes, like a chorus line in a cheap nightclub. And they go from south of the Ferry Building clear past the China Docks. Almost out of sight, about the same place you'll find a price tag on a new suit, you'll find Pier 23. From there it's a short trip to Denny O'Brien's Boat Shop. My place. I rent out boats and do anything else that means long odds and short hours. My sideline's trouble. And as long as I get paid, I can't be responsible for the guys that hire me.
- ConnessioniFollowed by Pier 23 (1951)
I più visti
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Sisters in Crime
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 59min
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1