[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario usciteI 250 migliori filmFilm più popolariCerca film per genereI migliori IncassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie filmIndia Film Spotlight
    Cosa c’è in TV e streamingLe 250 migliori serie TVSerie TV più popolariCerca serie TV per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareUltimi trailerOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsPremiazioniFestivalTutti gli eventi
    Nati oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona collaboratoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista dei Preferiti
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Quo Vadis

  • 1951
  • T
  • 2h 51min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,1/10
17.746
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Deborah Kerr, Robert Taylor, Peter Ustinov, and Patricia Laffan in Quo Vadis (1951)
International
Riproduci trailer1: 47
3 video
99+ foto
Sword & SandalDramaRomance

Dopo che il potente comandante romano Marco Vinicio si infatua di una bellissima cristiana prigioniera di nome Lygia, inizia a dubitare del tirannico regno del despotico imperatore Nerone.Dopo che il potente comandante romano Marco Vinicio si infatua di una bellissima cristiana prigioniera di nome Lygia, inizia a dubitare del tirannico regno del despotico imperatore Nerone.Dopo che il potente comandante romano Marco Vinicio si infatua di una bellissima cristiana prigioniera di nome Lygia, inizia a dubitare del tirannico regno del despotico imperatore Nerone.

  • Regia
    • Mervyn LeRoy
    • Anthony Mann
  • Sceneggiatura
    • John Lee Mahin
    • S.N. Behrman
    • Sonya Levien
  • Star
    • Robert Taylor
    • Deborah Kerr
    • Leo Genn
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    7,1/10
    17.746
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Mervyn LeRoy
      • Anthony Mann
    • Sceneggiatura
      • John Lee Mahin
      • S.N. Behrman
      • Sonya Levien
    • Star
      • Robert Taylor
      • Deborah Kerr
      • Leo Genn
    • 155Recensioni degli utenti
    • 53Recensioni della critica
    • 65Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Candidato a 8 Oscar
      • 9 vittorie e 10 candidature totali

    Video3

    Quo Vadis
    Trailer 1:47
    Quo Vadis
    Quo Vadis
    Trailer 1:46
    Quo Vadis
    Quo Vadis
    Trailer 1:46
    Quo Vadis
    Streaming Passport: The Roman Empire
    Clip 4:38
    Streaming Passport: The Roman Empire

    Foto233

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 226
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali99+

    Modifica
    Robert Taylor
    Robert Taylor
    • Marcus Vinicius
    Deborah Kerr
    Deborah Kerr
    • Lygia
    Leo Genn
    Leo Genn
    • Petronius
    Peter Ustinov
    Peter Ustinov
    • Nero
    Patricia Laffan
    Patricia Laffan
    • Poppaea
    Finlay Currie
    Finlay Currie
    • Peter
    Abraham Sofaer
    Abraham Sofaer
    • Paul
    Marina Berti
    Marina Berti
    • Eunice
    Buddy Baer
    Buddy Baer
    • Ursus
    Felix Aylmer
    Felix Aylmer
    • Plautius
    Nora Swinburne
    Nora Swinburne
    • Pomponia
    Ralph Truman
    Ralph Truman
    • Tigellinus
    Norman Wooland
    Norman Wooland
    • Nerva
    Peter Miles
    Peter Miles
    • Nazarius
    Geoffrey Dunn
    • Terpnos
    Nicholas Hannen
    Nicholas Hannen
    • Seneca
    D.A. Clarke-Smith
    D.A. Clarke-Smith
    • Phaon
    • (as D. A. Clarke-Smith)
    Rosalie Crutchley
    Rosalie Crutchley
    • Acte
    • Regia
      • Mervyn LeRoy
      • Anthony Mann
    • Sceneggiatura
      • John Lee Mahin
      • S.N. Behrman
      • Sonya Levien
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti155

    7,117.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    7mts43

    One of the best pre-Cinemascope religious epics

    In his waning days as head of MGM, the tyrannical Louis B Mayer gambled on costly costume dramas to combat the scourge of television competition. Quo Vadis was perhaps the best of those. Robert Taylor was his most convincing in mature Western roles later in his screen career, but he is also believable in this role as a Roman Centurion. The best acting performance in the film is the great Peter Ustinov in the role of Emperor Nero. An interesting supporting character is Buddy Baer as Ursus, which is Latin for "Bear", portraying a "Good Guy". He was the younger brother of former boxing Heavyweight Champion Max Baer and, at 6-7" and 250 lb., even bigger than his older brother . He was also a highly ranked Heavyweight, who twice fought Champion Joe Louis for the Heavyweight Championship. The story itself is pretty standard for the time in which it was made, but less offensive in the religious aspect than Cecil B DeMille ever was.
    gregcouture

    The original novel and this cinema version of it are two very different kettles of fish!

    A fellow IMDb-er from Poland, defending Henryk Sienkiewicz's monumental, Nobel Prize-winning novel (which I HAVE read, by the way) calls this M-G-M Technicolor spectacle "CRAP"!

    Please! The novel is incredibly dense and detailed; possibly a lot truer to what was known in the early part of the twentieth century of the actual events of the time of its plot; with lots of references to the cruelty and luxury of Nero's Rome; frequent mentions of the pervasive nudity under all kinds of circumstances among the Romans of the time; and, given its length, a perhaps more respectful view of the emergence of Christianity at a time when its converts risked their very lives to admit their beliefs. There is no way that even a multi-part TV mini-(I mean, maxi-)series could come close to approximating the novel's overwhelming complexity.

    But, as a piece of filmed entertainment, this cinema extravaganza is not at all worthy of being consigned to the proverbial garbage heap. The cast, yes, including Robert Taylor and Deborah Kerr, but, especially the supporting actors (Peter Ustinov, of course; plus Leo Genn, in particular, as well as Patricia Laffan, Marina Berti, Finlay Currie, Felix Aylmer, Rosalie Crutchley, et al.) all take full advantage of a script that had many witty as well as dramatic moments and, for its day, a fairly reverent (though not historically accurate) rendering of Christianity's emergence in a hostile Roman world.

    In addition its production values have never been surpassed; in fact, they've never been equalled. One understands how beleaguered those of Polish descent often must feel (I, for one, have never been a fan of so-called "Polish jokes."), but let's not set impossible standards for a translation of one of Poland's most memorable literary achievements! This production is an example of Hollywood marshalling some impressive resources, while avoiding more than a modicum of the cliches that can sabotage such a project. It may not honor its source as some might wish, but it's still a quite grand and opulently eye-filling way to enjoy close to three hours.
    8theowinthrop

    How we missed having the city of "Neropolis"

    Henryk Sienkiewicz was one of Poland's great historical novelists, and one of the first recipients of the Nobel Prize for literature (1905). It has only been in the last decade or so that translations of other novels by him have appeared in English, but his major work, QUO VADIS?, has been known since it appeared over a century ago. It was a study of the early days of the Christians in Rome, and their first persecution by the Emperor Nero (54 - 68 A.D.) It concentrates on the burning of Rome and the persecution of the Christians (including the death by crucifixion of St. Peter). So the background is identical to Cecil B. DeMille's THE SIGN OF THE CROSS. Inevitably comparisons between the two films, their plots, and the performances of the two Neros (Charles Laughton and Peter Ustinov) result.

    But the two stories are not the same. Sienkiewicz threw in far more of the history of the Rome of that period than the author of the play THE SIGN OF THE CROSS did. And because of his deeply felt commitment to his faith, Sienkiewicz showed the destruction of Nero's rotten regime and the first triumph of Christianity. THE SIGN OF THE CROSS does not do that - my comment there was that DeMille never made such a pessimistic and tragic film in his career, with all the good people being destroyed and Nero (at that time) triumphant. This does not happen in QUO VADIS, where the corruption and incompetence of the regime finally loses the support of the people (and ... ironically worse ... the army!).

    There is also the addition of the leading poet-courtier of the day, Petronius Arbiter. A man of wit and taste, Petronius was one of several figures of literary note in Nero's court, and one of several to meet tragedy by being near that egomaniac. The others were led by Nero's original chief minister Seneca, the stoic philosopher and dramatist. Seneca's nephew Lucan was also a leading figure in the court. Both men were eventually turned into foes of the regime, especially as Seneca fell from his ministerial position after the murder of Nero's mother Agrippina. Petronius managed to avoid the political conflict that involved the other two, but the Emperor's irrational jealousy helped link the three. Lucan wrote a savage epic poem against the Imperial family (PHARSALIA) which signaled his rejection of the regime. Lucan joined a conspiracy against Nero led by a Senator named Piso. It was discovered, and Lucan and Seneca implicated. Both were forced to commit suicide (by opening their veins). Tigellinus, Nero's leading adviser, insinuated that Petronius was involved too (he wasn't). Petronius also committed suicide the same way, but wrote a witty and accurate denunciation to Nero which was given to the Emperor after the writer's death.

    Petronius' major surviving work, THE SATYRICON, was a wonderful look at the rot at the center of the regime of Nero. It (by the way) was turned into a film by Fellini in the late 1960s.

    Leo Genn brought Petronius and his delicate wit and taste out in the film, and merited the Oscar nomination he got for this - his best remembered role (aside from Dr. "Kick" in THE SNAKE PIT). Ustinov brings a degree of frailty to Nero - an uncertainty as to the acceptance of his public persona. He flails about between seeking the approval of the artists like Petronius and those who manipulate the tyrant in him (Poppeia and Tigellinus). Despite his vicious evil one sympathizes with him - he is a sick man. And his reconstruction program (he burns down old Rome to create "Neropolis") is on par to that of another tyrant of more recent vintage, who planned to build a world capital called "Germania" over Berlin's bones. He too left many bones, but it is hard to consider him at all sympathetic.

    As spectacle and history QUO VADIS? is quite rewarding. It may telescope the events of 64 - 68 A.D. (when Nero committed suicide with assistance), and avoid the three brief Emperors who ruled after Nero within the year (Galba, Otho, and Vitellius) before Vespasian came back from the war in Israel to take the throne for a decade - but it does show how Nero's regime collapsed. DeMille never tackled it. But despite those two omissions the film does do the period pretty well.

    Robert Taylor is more effective as a military commander / hero than Fredric March had been in SIGN OF THE CROSS. Deborah Kerr is more believable as an early Christian convert. And Finley Currie is wonderful as Simon Peter - who realizes that he must die for the Lord that he once denied. His end is based on a legend that Peter was crucified upside down, supposedly at his request that he did not deserve to be crucified in the same way as the Lord he briefly failed. Altogether a superior religious - historic epic.
    Doylenf

    Lives up to your expectations...Leo Genn and Peter Ustinov steal the acting honors...

    Ancient Rome never looked so good--especially in the gorgeous MGM technicolor of 1951. Costumes, sets, photography and music are all of a high order--and all of the performances are competent with two outstanding ones by Leo Genn (Petronius) and Peter Ustinov (Nero). Ustinov reminds me of an overbaked Charles Laughton in some of his mad scenes, but he is a convincing weakling as Nero. Leo Genn has some of the wittiest dialogue and handles his lines with professional ease, his eyes flashing with humor as he pretends to agree with Nero on certain points. Robert Taylor is stalwart in the lead giving his usual dependable performance and Deborah Kerr is lovely (if a bit British in manner) as Lygia.

    All the action and excitement you want from a spectacle--the burning of Rome, Christians in the arena thrown to the lions, the triumphal marches accompanied by Miklos Rozsa's mighty score--and scenes with sentimental and religious overtones (sometimes too extended and talky) --all combine to make the kind of lush spectacle MGM knew would be popular at the box-office. Although discriminating critics found fault with certain factors, it won eight Academy Award nominations with Ustinov and Genn both nominated for supporting roles.

    Grand scale spectacle--but don't expect anything deep.
    7hitchcockthelegend

    You will be worthy of the spectacle - as the spectacle is worthy of you.

    General Marcus Vinicius (Robert Taylor) returns to Rome after battle and falls in love with Lygia (Deborah Kerr), an adopted daughter of a fellow general, but effectively a hostage and considered a no no. When she is presented to him as a gift, things are further compounded by the fact that she is in secret a Christian. Enter Emperor Nero (Peter Ustinov) who orders that all Christians must be thrown to the lions, leaving Marcus with no option but to deny his Pretorian ways and to try and save Lygia and her family. Rome, will never be the same again.

    A big, bold and lavish historical epic out of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer that's directed by Mervyn LeRoy, shot in glorious Technicolor by Robert Surtees & William V. Skall and is scored by Miklós Rózsa. Joining the big hitters in the cast are Leo Genn, Finlay Currie, Felix Aylmer & Abraham Sofaer. While the adaptation of Henryk Sienkiewicz's novel is written by S. N. Behrman, Sonya Levien & John Lee Mahin. There's no denying that Quo Vadis, meaning "where are you going" and appertaining to the encounter between St Peter and Jesus Christ on the Appian Way, is a technical spectacle. It's also tough going for its over talky melodramatics during the first 90 minutes, but you just have to stay with it, once you are in, you are in for the long haul. A whole afternoon in my case!

    For its time, this was the bigger than than biggest, a studios dream, the cast of thousands, the sets, the costumes and the gazillion speaking parts that make up the story. It's also a point where the historical epic became more than just entertainment and a reason to make money. No doubt about it, Quo Vadis is very pro Christian, it has something to say, even if ultimately it takes a long time to say it and is historically dubious. There's thought and intelligence within, with that, it pays to pay attention and sample the dialogue whilst feasting your eyes on the magnificence that surrounds the characters. Once the worthwhile action kicks in, it's no let down, the fights in the Coliseum, the burning of Rome (we can thank the great Anthony Mann for that one) and the dramatic climax, all make the time spent leading up to them more than worth it. The cast are mostly agreeable, Kerr is gorgeous as ever and Taylor is, ahem, straight as ever, while Ustinov goes full tilt campy loony. Genn steals the movie as Petronius while Patricia Laffan as Poppaea Sabina gives one of the most sensually minx like portrayals given in an historical epic.

    Some may find the religiose aspects over bearing, but the spectacle does win out. Looking as gorgeous as ever now after being remastered, Quo Vadis is a must see for like minded historical epic fans. It's some way down the pecking order of the genre greats, but still a must see movie regardless. 7/10

    Altri elementi simili

    La tunica
    6,7
    La tunica
    Barabba
    6,9
    Barabba
    La caduta dell'impero romano
    6,7
    La caduta dell'impero romano
    El Cid
    7,2
    El Cid
    I gladiatori
    6,6
    I gladiatori
    Giulio Cesare
    7,2
    Giulio Cesare
    Quo vadis
    5,7
    Quo vadis
    Cleopatra
    7,0
    Cleopatra
    Ivanhoe
    6,7
    Ivanhoe
    Il re dei re
    7,0
    Il re dei re
    Spartacus
    7,9
    Spartacus
    Il tormento e l'estasi
    7,2
    Il tormento e l'estasi

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      In his memoirs, "Dear Me" (1981), Sir Peter Ustinov recalled that MGM had sought him for the role of Emperor Nero but dithered for months, refusing to commit. During this time, he received numerous telegrams from the studio, one of which stated that they were concerned that he might be too young to play the notorious Roman Emperor. Ustinov replied that Emperor Nero died when he was thirty, and that if they waited much longer, he'd be too old. The studio cabled back: "Historical research has proved you correct. You have the part." Coincidentally (or not), Ustinov was 30 years old when this movie was released.
    • Blooper
      Marcus Vinicius is angry because the Emperor will not allow him to bring his legion into the city of Rome. Since the early days of the Republic a military commander was forbidden to bring his troops armed into the city of Rome.
    • Citazioni

      Petronius: [in his dying letter to Nero] To Nero, Emperor of Rome, Master of the World, Divine Pontiff. I know that my death will be a disappointment to you, since you wished to render me this service yourself. To be born in your reign is a miscalculation; but to die in it is a joy. I can forgive you for murdering your wife and your mother, for burning our beloved Rome, for befouling our fair country with the stench of your crimes. But one thing I cannot forgive - the boredom of having to listen to your verses, your second-rate songs, your mediocre performances. Adhere to your special gifts, Nero - murder and arson, betrayal and terror. Mutilate your subjects if you must; but with my last breath I beg you - do not mutilate the arts. Fare well, but compose no more music. Brutalize the people, but do not bore them, as you have bored to death your friend, the late Gaius Petronius.

    • Versioni alternative
      The DVD release restores the original overture and exit music, which, up until that point, was only heard in the original roadshow release and in the 1964 roadshow re-release.
    • Connessioni
      Edited into Atlantide continente perduto (1961)

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti18

    • How long is Quo Vadis?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 5 marzo 1953 (Italia)
    • Paese di origine
      • Stati Uniti
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Qvo Vadis
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Roma, Lazio, Italia
    • Azienda produttrice
      • Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 7.623.000 USD (previsto)
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 101.486 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      2 ore 51 minuti
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.37 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    Deborah Kerr, Robert Taylor, Peter Ustinov, and Patricia Laffan in Quo Vadis (1951)
    Divario superiore
    By what name was Quo Vadis (1951) officially released in India in English?
    Rispondi
    • Visualizza altre lacune di informazioni
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.