Amaro destino

"House of Strangers" features three of my all-time favorite actors--Edward G. Robinson, Susan Hayward and Richard Conte--all at the very top of their form, as well as moody, almost noirish direction by the great Joseph L. Mankiewicz, in moody black and white. Those ingredients alone should indicate that a fine work is in store for the viewer, and such, happily, is the case here. The tale is told mainly in flashback, in which we learn how the four sons of Lower East Side banker Edward G. became enemies after their Pop got into some legal trouble. Susan Hayward, never more beautiful, plays a high-class dame who becomes involved with lawyer Conte, despite Conte's engagement to a proper Italian girl from "the old country." The relationship between Hayward and Conte is very adult for the restrictive late '40s. By the film's end, we really come to care about these two and hope that they can survive as a couple. As usual, Edward G. gives a bravura performance, this time as the domineering patriarch of his Italian clan. I believe his performance received a well-deserved award at Cannes that year. Conte and Hayward, both of whose careers are ripe for reevaluation and rediscovery, match him every step of the way. Luther Adler is fine also, in his role as Conte's elder brother, who feels he never got the respect he deserved. Deborah Paget, in one of her earliest parts, looks fine in a decorative role. For me, though, the main lure of this picture is the triumvirate of superb acting by the three leads. What a pleasure it is to watch these three great talents do justice to the well-written script here. I just love this movie, and suspect that a real treat is in store for the first-time viewer. Check it out, by all means!

"House of Strangers" has done me a great service. Richard Conte has always been in my mind as the sadistic husband in "I"ll Cry Tomorrow" - the chap who trips Susan Hayward up so people will think she is drunk, the one who doesn't call her up when he says, so, (he hopes) she will start drinking again. I have seen him in other films but none was able to erase that memory.

So seeing him and Susan Hayward in "House of Strangers" as a fiery but decent couple has softened him in my eyes.

The story is told in flashback as Max (Richard Conte) goes to the bank, after years in prison, to have revenge on his family. Later at the family home he thinks over past events.

Edward G. Robinson plays Gino Monetti a powerful banker whose sons have to do his bidding. Richard Conte plays Max, who is an attorney, instead of following his brothers into the bank. He is also the only son who is treated with respect by the father and the other brothers resent it.

He also begins a tempestuous affair with Susan Hayward while his fiancée (Debra Paget) sits meekly by. The father is bought to trial for "cooking the books" and Max goes to jail for 7 years for trying to bribe a member of the jury. From his cell he is inundated with letters from his father filling him with hatred for his brothers.

The last 15 minutes are a real shock and brings the film up a few notches. Susan Hayward is her typically fiesty self and does a lot more with the character than is written. Edward G. Robinson over-acts as the larger than life Italian banker.

Try and imagine Little Caesar getting out of the rackets and taking his hard stolen loot and setting up a bank. Then Mr. Bandello marries and has four sons.

You've got Gino Monetti who now that he's no longer terrorizing citizens confines his terrors to his own family. He's got four grown sons and he treats them like the hired help. All except Richard Conte who instead of working for him directly at the bank uses the bank's space for his law office.

I think that's the key to this film. The other three sons Luther Adler, Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., and Paul Valentine all do work for him and he can treat them like dirt. Conte on the other hand, does not work for him, he's made his own career. By Robinson's logic, he's earned a certain amount of respect.

So he pits them against each other. Unfortunately Robinson's banking practices which are not exactly legal catch up with him. He's forced to turn the bank over to the three sons in an effort to save the bank.

Conte also tries to bribe a juror to save dear old Dad and gets disbarred and a stretch of seven years in prison for his troubles. Conte's out now and looking to even things up with his siblings.

Robinson who's played all kinds of immigrants of many nationalities has covered the Italian ground before. But he's real good as the scheming, sadistic patriarch who in fact gets a deserved comeuppance from his sons. All four sons are fine in their roles with Richard Conte and Luther Adler deserving particular attention.

Susan Hayward is the girl who waits for Conte. She must be in love with him. A disbarred attorney isn't exactly a dream prospect. She was just entering into the height of her career and this role was a career boost.

House of Strangers is far superior to the western setting remake that 20th Century Fox did five years later entitled Broken Lance

This is one of those well-crafted films from Twentieth-Century Fox when that studio employed some extraordinary talents both before and behind the cameras. Although he wasn't a Fox contractee, Edward G. Robinson gives a great performance as a wealthy Italian family's patriarch and he is well-matched by everyone else in the cast, especially Richard Conte, Luther Adler, and Susan Hayward, looking terrifically classy. The script bears some obvious signs of being polished by the director, Joseph L. Mankiewicz, and the technical credits are absolutely top-drawer.

Remade as a Western in CinemaScope and Color by DeLuxe in 1954, entitled "Broken Lance" with Spencer Tracy cast as the domineering father, the direction by Edward Dmytryk was not up to the standard of this earlier film with its then contemporary setting. This one is available on video (and seems to be very rarely exhumed on TV now) and is definitely worth a look.

"House of Strangers" clearly is a film noir drama and crime story. But more than anything else, it's a showcase for the talent of Edward G. Robinson. This is a great performance by a great actor who never got so much as a nomination from any of the major groups in the film world. It always strikes me as a bit strange - maybe even a picture of a hypocritical and belatedly humiliated and humbled Hollywood, when it gives an honorary award for someone "who achieved greatness as a player, a patron of the arts, and a dedicated citizen, etc." But the person was never great enough to even be nominated once? Especially, when there's a list of outstanding films that he or she appeared in, either in a leading role or in a major supporting role.

Well, Mr. Robinson got his honorary Oscar in 1973. The fact that this took place at the March 27 Academy Awards ceremony -- two months and one day after Robinson died, further suggests the idea that the moguls of Hollywood (actors, directors and producers) were a little shame-faced and trying to save face. For posterity, the records would show that they did indeed honor this great actor. The albeit is that it was with a guilty conscience and almost in hindsight after he had died.

Edward G. Robinson has played a crook, a conman, a cop, a comic, and a crime boss. He was the consummate tough guy whether in a gangster movie, a war film, or a caper comedy.. Whatever role he had, Robinson was a fine actor and entertainer.

In this movie, Robinson plays Gino Monetti, an Italian immigrant who has made good. The uneducated tough guy worked hard to get where he is. Now he has a significant financial operation in a tough neighborhood of New York City. Many people rely on Monetti and his bank to help them in crises and their small businesses The trouble is, Gino doesn't know the rules - or the law and the regulations governing banking. So, he operates on the basis of handshakes, oral agreements and hand-scribbled notes. We see him as a kind-hearted guy helping out a widow who needs train fare for a dying relative. And, we see him taking a big cut of a loan to a street merchant who needs to buy a new horse to pull his wagon.

But the main story is about his family,. He has four sons. It's a very dysfunctional family. He treats three of the sons like dirt while favoring one of the younger of the two, Max, who has become a lawyer. The others are lackeys working as window clerks and guards in the bank.

All of this will lead to family disputes and conflicts that tear the family apart. As the matron of the family says, when times were tough and they had a barbershop they were a family and happy. But now they have nothing in the midst of plenty. After Gino dies, she says she no longer has four sons. The plot in which all of this comes about is noir and high grade drama.

Besides Robinson's central role, Richard Conte shares the limelight as Max. And, after he meets Susan Hayward's Irene Bennett, sparks of a sort fly hither and thither. Max and Irene have a running feud of words that are put-downs, insults, jabs and dismissals. So, naturally, they fall in love. Indeed, it isn't natural and it's the hardest subplot of this film to swallow. While such a relationship between two such personalities surely does happen sometimes, it would have to be extremely rare. Their spatting dialog maybe was intended to put some spice and wit into this film, but I think it's mostly a deviation from the Monetti family collapse.

Those who enjoy noir films should go for this one in a big way. Those who don't care for the sub-genre should probably skip it entirely. For other fans, it depends on what else may be appealing or not so - family dysfunction, tyrannical family head, very disrespectful treatment of a woman, etc. My eight stars are for the acting - not only by Robinson, but by most of the rest of the cast as well.

Here are a couple of the better lines in this film.

Joe Monetti, "A man who throws away money is a big worry. A big problem."

Max Monetti, "Vengeance is a rare wine, a joy divine, says the Arab."