Il giornalista di Chicago, P.J. McNeal, riapre un caso di omicidio di dieci anni fa.Il giornalista di Chicago, P.J. McNeal, riapre un caso di omicidio di dieci anni fa.Il giornalista di Chicago, P.J. McNeal, riapre un caso di omicidio di dieci anni fa.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 4 vittorie e 2 candidature totali
- Helen Wiecek
- (as Joanne de Bergh)
- Taxicab Driver
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Warden of Stateville Prison
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Police Photographic Technician
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Jan Gruska
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Narrator
- (voce)
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Secretary
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Filmed in semi-documentary style by director Henry Hathaway, this James Stewart led noir thriller oozes realism from start to finish. It's actually the lack of gloss and glamour that is the film's trump card. Based on the real story of the Joe Majczek case in 1933, it's filmed perfectly on location in Chicago {where the actual events happened}, gloriously mood emphasised by Joe MacDonald's superb black & white cinematography, and scored with tonal adroitness by Alfred Newman. As intrepid Chicago Times reporter McNeal {based on real reporter Jim McGuire who was a Pulitzer Prize winner for his investigative efforts on this case}, James Stewart lays down a marker for the more edgier character roles that would follow for him in the 50s. Here he plays it perfect as McNeal shifts from mere cynical newsman to an outright crusader of justice; and it's riding along with McNeal that this human interest piece lifts itself to great crime thriller heights. Along the way we find problems are encountered and police procedural techniques are scrutinised. All may not be as it first seemed, and this mysterious element ices what was already a delightful docu-drama based cake.
There is not much else to say, it's a film I personally highly recommend, a fascinating story that is given top care and attention from all involved, mean, moody and yes, magnificent. 8/10
Frank Wiecek (Richard Conte) has been convicted of a cop killing and sentenced to 99 years in prison. Convinced of her son's innocence, Frank's mother, an elderly and lowly cleaning lady, takes out an ad in the newspaper for information that will help free her son. McNeal grudgingly looks into the case, but doubts Wiecek's innocence. As the film moves along, McNeal slowly changes his perception of Wiecek.
Some viewers consider this to be a film-noir. To me, it is more of a docudrama, a staging of a real life story. The dialogue seems realistic. And the acting is low-key and credible. The film also highlights the technology of the era, including the use of the printing press, the polygraph, and a miniature camera.
But what impressed me most was the use of the Chicago locations where the real life story took place. Further, the B&W visuals are appropriately drab, dreary, and depressing, which reflects the tone of the actual events. There's very little background music, which also adds authenticity to the film. The only downside is the matter-of-fact procedural style in which the story is told, especially relative to the fatherly VO narration at the film's beginning and end. The film comes across at times as dry, and lacking emotional depth.
Devoid of cinematic hype, and told in a straightforward and plodding manner, "Call Northside 777" will appeal to people who seek realism in films. And, of course, the film's basis in fact, vis-a-vis fiction, adds to its credibility.
On orders from editor Lee J. Cobb, Stewart checks out the source behind a small personal advertisement in the Chicago Sun-Times where he works. The ad is placed by Richard Conte's mother who works as a cleaning woman and saved enough money to offer a reward of $5000.00 for information clearing her son.
Back during the last days of Prohibition, Conte and another man were sent up for killing a Chicago policeman in a grocery store that fronted for a speakeasy. Conte was convicted mainly on the eyewitness testimony of the owner of the establishment Betty Garde.
Stewart gradually comes to believe in Conte's innocence and works tirelessly on his behalf. The best single performance in this film is by Betty Garde. A real portrait in evil that one is.
This has always been a film I've had an identity with. I had a similar situation in my former job with NYS Crime Victims Board. I had a case where a man sustained multiple injuries including the loss of a leg when a car drove up on a sidewalk and hit him. The report was never written up as any kind of crime, just an accident. The driver was given a summons and that was that.
I did a lot of work to prove the police were wrong in their action and it took two years, but I gathered enough evidence and my claimant was declared a crime victim and received the benefits from my former agency. The perpetrator was never charged with anything, but that was not in my mandate. Nevertheless I know exactly what Jimmy Stewart had to prove and how hard it is. The police even more than most of us do not like to admit they are wrong.
Call Northside 777 is a nicely done documentary style feature which is a great lesson in what a man with determination can accomplish.
The based-on-a-true-story worked on me a little in this movie. With the matter of fact narration and the trusted face of Stewart, it becomes quite compelling. Stewart especially is the perfect guy for the role. His early cynicism is a great starting point. This is a compelling rip-from-the-headlines story led by a great actor.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe man administering the polygraph test to convict Richard Conte was the inventor of the polygraph or lie detector machine, Leonarde Keeler. He played himself in the movie.
- BlooperWhen McNeal is interviewing Helen Wiecek Rayska, prior to the arrival home of Mr. Rayska, Helen indicates that she only divorced Frank Wiecek AFTER Mr. Rayska had met and began loving her and her son, Frank Jr. However, when Mr. Rayska and Frank Jr. arrive home after that point in the interview, Mr. Rayska tells McNeal with certainty that he never even met Helen and Frank Jr. until after the divorce was finalized, and that he could provide proof of that.
Frank's ex-wife says that Frank asked her to divorce him for over a year. In the next sentence she says then she met her new husband which can be interpreted as after she finally acted and got the divorce. Her story and her new husband's agree.
- Citazioni
[McNeal is trying to get Zaleska to name his real partner in the crime and get a chance at parole]
P.J. McNeal: What have you got to lose? You're in for life now. C'mon, tell us the truth.
Tomek Zaleska: Sure, I could say I did it. Then maybe have a chance of getting out, like you say. But if I confessed, who would I name as my partner, Joe Doakes? I couldn't make it stick for one minute. That's the trouble with being innocent. You don't know what really happened. I didn't do it. Me and Frank had nothin' to do with it.
- Curiosità sui creditiOpening credits are printed on the pages of a book; it is also stated that this is a true story.
- ConnessioniEdited from L'incendio di Chicago (1938)
- Colonne sonoreChicago (That Toddlin' Town)
(1922) (uncredited)
Music by Fred Fisher
Played during the Prohibition montage
I più visti
- How long is Call Northside 777?Powered by Alexa
- Joanne de Bergh---When did she sign for "Northside"?
- Helen Walker---When was she signed for "Northside"?
- Chicago Opening Happened When?
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Yo creo en ti
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Stateville Correctional Center - 16830 South Broadway Street, Joliet, Illinois, Stati Uniti(Illinois State Penitentiary: panopticon & cells interiors; entrance exteriors)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 52 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.33 : 1